






Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
Prepare-se para as provas
Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Prepare-se para as provas com trabalhos de outros alunos como você, aqui na Docsity
Os melhores documentos à venda: Trabalhos de alunos formados
Prepare-se com as videoaulas e exercícios resolvidos criados a partir da grade da sua Universidade
Responda perguntas de provas passadas e avalie sua preparação.
Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
Comunidade
Peça ajuda à comunidade e tire suas dúvidas relacionadas ao estudo
Descubra as melhores universidades em seu país de acordo com os usuários da Docsity
Guias grátis
Baixe gratuitamente nossos guias de estudo, métodos para diminuir a ansiedade, dicas de TCC preparadas pelos professores da Docsity
Guidance on the explosive ordnance disposal (eod) clearance of armoured fighting vehicles (afv) encountered during demining operations in a post-conflict environment. It covers reasons for afv clearance, explosive threats, safety measures, and clearance methodology.
Tipologia: Notas de estudo
1 / 12
Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização
Não perca as partes importantes!
Draft version 1. (Amendment 1, July 2013)
ii
Warning
This document is distributed for use by the mine action community, review and comment. Although in a similar format to the International Mine Action Standards (IMAS) it is not part of the IMAS Series. It is subject to change without notice and may not be referred to as an International Standard.
Recipients of this document are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are aware and to provide supporting documentation. Comments should be sent to mineaction@un.org with a copy to imas@gichd.org.
The contents of this document have been drawn from a range of open source information, and have been technically validated as far as reasonably possible. Users should be aware of this limitation when utilising the information contained within this document. They should always remember that this is an advisory document only; it is not an authoritative directive.
Draft version 1. (Amendment 1, July 2013)
iv
Foreword
Management practices and operational procedures for humanitarian mine action are constantly evolving. Improvements are made, and changes are required, to enhance safety and productivity. Changes may come from the introduction of new technology, in response to a new mine or UXO threat, and from field experience and lessons learned in other mine action projects and programmes. This experience and lessons learned should be shared in a timely manner.
Technical Notes provide a forum to share experience and lessons learned by collecting, collating and publishing technical information on important, topical themes, particularly those relating to safety and productivity. Technical Notes complement the broader issues and principles addressed in International Mine Action Standards (IMAS).
Technical Notes are not formally staffed prior to publication. They draw on practical experience and publicly-available information. Over time, some Technical Notes may be 'promoted' to become full IMAS standards, while others may be withdrawn if no longer relevant or if superseded by more up-to-date information.
Technical Notes are neither legal documents nor IMAS. There is no legal requirement to accept the advice provided in a Technical Note. They are purely advisory and are designed solely to supplement technical knowledge or to provide further guidance on the application of IMAS.
Technical Notes are compiled by the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) at the request of the United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS) in support of the international mine action community. They are published on the IMAS website at www.mineactionstandards.org.
(Amendment 1, July 2013)
v
Introduction
The explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) clearance of armoured fighting vehicles (AFV) can be one of the most technically complex and demanding operations conducted by an EOD technician. It requires the development of render safe procedures (RSP) from first principles combined with a detailed understanding of the design and make-up of ammunition systems.
In post-conflict environments there could be a requirement to ensure that AFVs are safe as part of the humanitarian demining process. This Technical Note has been written, as an advisory document, to ensure that managers, field staff and EOD technicians are aware of all the potential hazards and provides guidance to the development of a safe RSP.
The EOD clearance of AFVs should only be undertaken by appropriately qualified EOD personnel; it is not a task for basic deminers or other field staff.
Draft version 1. (Amendment 1, July 2013)
There are a number of explosive-related threats that require elimination during the AFV clearance operation:
Any remaining ERA may well be in an unstable condition after being subjected to the effects of anti- tank weapons, submunitions or mines.
The use of DU munitions could have produced a radio-active or toxic hazard (Refer to Technical Note 02/2001 for the threat posed by DU and the principles for the clearance of DU ammunition or contaminated areas).
The threat of access denial devices laid by the warring factions prior to abandonment of the AFV should be considered.
The threat posed by UXO in the surrounding area of the AFV should always be considered. In particular be aware of the dangers posed by ammunition “kicked out” of the AFV during its destruction. This may well look “unfired” or safe, but the fuzing system may have been subjected to the centrifugal, set back and set forward forces required to arm many fuze types.
The ammunition will also have been subjected to diurnal cycling, which may have a negative effect on the stability and consistency of the explosive fill. Degradation of the explosive will affect the sensitivity of the explosive, whilst heat can change the explosive consistency allowing explosive migration into the fuze cavity and threads.
Artillery or air delivered submunitions could well have been used to destroy the AFV. Failure rates of such munitions can be as high as 30%; there could be failed sub-munitions on the surface of, and around, the AFV.
In addition to the hazards posed by the possible presence of DU contamination, additional health hazards could be present because of human remains still in the vehicle; the remains are classified as UN Class 6.2 dangerous goods. Due to the contagious nature of naturally occurring bodily fluids and diseases in human remains, and the need to maintain the appropriate respect for the dead, the handling of human remains during clearance operations must be carried out with great care. The detailed hazard will be dependant on factors such as time of death, cause of death, any diurnal cycling the remains have been subjected to etc. The EOD technician should, wherever possible, obtain medical advice prior to AFV entry and disturbance of the remains. (Further information is given Clause 08.10).
AFV will also present other industrial health hazards. These will include:
a) leakage of battery acids;
b) leakage of hydraulic fluids;
Draft version 1. (Amendment 1, July 2013)
c) fuel; and
d) radiac sources, such as tritium, for weapons systems and optical systems.
7.1. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)^1
The following PPE shall be used by the EOD technician until the presence of DU can be positively discounted:
a) inner cotton gloves;
b) outer heavy PVC gloves;
c) respirator^2 ; and
d) protective trousers and overboots. (Optional to protect clothing).
The EOD technician should wear a TLD during AFV clearance operations. Personal dosimetry and health checks should be co-ordinated with a local appropriately qualified medical facility.
Visually search the surrounding area for UXO. Disposal of any UXO found is a matter of judgement for the EOD technician. If there is any risk of mines, then demining assets should be deployed to clear a safe working area.
Conduct an external search of the AFV to identify any UXO (submunitions) present on the external surface of the AFV. Mark any found.
Some nation’s ERA has been subjected to trials to ensure that hot-cutting techniques, if used with care, can be used to remove damaged plates. This is not necessarily the case for all ERA, therefore hot cutting techniques should not be used.
During the external search of the AFV the EOD technician should assess the likely munition that has caused the damage or destruction. The threat from DU can then be ascertained. Remember that DU munitions may well be part of the turret stocks of the AFV, and therefore a DU threat can not be discounted at this stage.
A Portable Contamination Meter (PCM) - Type Mini-Monitor fitted with a B-6-H GM Tube can be used to identify DU contaminated areas.
(^1) This PPE is in addition to the blast and fragmentation PPE requirements discussed in IMAS 10.30.
(^2) Industrial Filtering Face Mask, Type 3M 8825 or 4255 may be used if it is positively confirmed that DU not
present but human remains are still in the AFV.
Draft version 1. (Amendment 1, July 2013)
The EOD technician should conduct a detailed search in order to identify any access denial devices deployed within the crew compartment of the vehicle.
The EOD technician may now enter the vehicle.
It may be necessary to remove human remains in order to gain access to assess the condition of turret stocks 3
. International advice from an appropriate international organisation, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), should be obtained to ensure that all necessary war graves registration processes are carried out.
The EOD technician should now proceed to clear turret stocks of ammunition in accordance with the principles of ammunition design, inspection and surveillance. Further RSPs may be necessary for ammunition that is considered too dangerous to be removed for bulk destruction.
It is the responsibility of the National Mine Action Authority to ensure that the managers of all local demining teams, NGOs or commercial companies are aware of the existence of this Technical Note, especially if AFVs may have been used during international or internal conflicts in the nation concerned.
It is the responsibility of the management of local demining teams, NGOs or commercial companies to pay attention to this Technical Note, and incorporate the recommendations into SOPs where appropriate. Where no National Mine Action Authority exists, it is the their responsibility to ensure that all demining teams are aware of the recommendations in this Technical Note.
It is the responsibility of all field staff, whether deminers or EOD, to carry out the recommendations in this Technical Note to the best of their ability, and to inform their management if compliance with the recommendations cannot be achieved.
(^3) Industrial Filtering Face Mask, Type 3M 8825 or 4255 may be used if it is positively confirmed that DU not
present but human remains are still in the AFV. The EOD technician should also wear protective overalls and gloves to prevent contamination of normal clothing. These should be burnt on completion of the task.
Draft version 1. (Amendment 1, July 2013)
The following documents, when referred to in the text of this Technical Guide, form part of the provisions of this guide.
a) IMAS 04.10. Glossary of demining terms; and
b) Technical Note 02/2001. Clearance of Depleted Uranium (DU) hazards.
The latest version/edition of these references should be used. GICHD hold copies of all references used in this Technical Note. A register of the latest version/edition of the IMAS standards, guides and references is maintained by GICHD, and can be found on the IMAS website (www.mineactionstandards.org). National mine action authorities, employers and other interested bodies and organisations should obtain copies before commencing mine action programmes.
The latest version/edition of the Technical Notes can be accessed via the GICHD website: (www.gichd.org).