Docsity
Docsity

Prepare-se para as provas
Prepare-se para as provas

Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity


Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos para baixar

Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium


Guias e Dicas
Guias e Dicas

drugs and brain writing, Exercícios de Serviço Social

homework for the drugs and brain course at grorge mason university

Tipologia: Exercícios

2024

Compartilhado em 12/10/2024

neno-eno
neno-eno 🇧🇷

1 documento

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização

Não perca as partes importantes!

bg1
Writing Assignment 1
1) When I was in undergrad, the drink of choice for pre-gaming was the original Four Loko which
was 12% malt liquor mixed with the caffeine of multiple cups of coffee. This combination of
caffeine and alcohol was dangerous as the caffeine masked the effects of alcohol causing an
increased risk of blackouts and alcohol poisoning. The FDA banned the drinks.
Read the following: http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170723105406/https://www.fda.gov/
Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/FoodAdditivesIngredients/ucm233726.htm
Why did the FDA ban these beverages?
The FDA banned caffeinated alcoholic drinks because mixing alcohol with caffeine can be
dangerous. Caffeine can hide the effects of alcohol, making people feel less drunk than they
actually are. This often leads to riskier behavior, like drinking more than they should or putting
themselves in dangerous situations, with a higher chance of alcohol poisoning or other serious
outcomes.
Did the FDA ban coffee flavored liquors with incidental caffeine?
No, the FDA didn’t ban coffee-flavored liquors that naturally contain caffeine from ingredients
like coffee. The ban was aimed specifically at malt beverages where caffeine was added
separately as an ingredient.
Do you agree with the FDAs decision?
The FDA's decision to ban caffeinated alcoholic beverages makes sense from a public health
standpoint. These drinks have been associated with serious risks because caffeine can hide some
of the signs of intoxication, which might lead people to drink more than they realize. Given the
insufficient scientific data proving these products are safe, banning them likely helped prevent
harm.
At a bar, you can still order a red-bull vodka and you can still pre-game with jaeger-bombs, does
this change your opinion?
The FDA banned pre-packaged caffeinated alcoholic beverages and drinks like Red Bull vodka
and Jäger bombs can still be found in bars. These combinations present similar risks, as caffeine
can also mask signs of intoxication. The ban targeted products that were widely marketed, but it
leaves a gap since energy drinks can still be mixed with alcohol in social settings. This could
undermine the goal of reducing risks associated with caffeine and alcohol together. Still, the
dangers posed by mass-marketed options, especially for inexperienced drinkers, make the FDA’s
original decision a necessary precaution.
2) The current DEA statues arrange drugs into schedules 1-5. Re-write your own drug schedule
below. How many classes should there be? Should they still be numbered, or would you prefer a
more fun system?
There should still be five classes, arranged from high risk to low risk, to make them easier to
understand and memorize. In some cases, we can still use numbers for reference. However,
instead of sticking to just numbers, we can create a more fun system, a more relatable and
engaging format by using creative names and definitions that clearly represent each level of
risk and medical use.
pf3

Pré-visualização parcial do texto

Baixe drugs and brain writing e outras Exercícios em PDF para Serviço Social, somente na Docsity!

  1. When I was in undergrad, the drink of choice for pre-gaming was the original Four Loko which was 12% malt liquor mixed with the caffeine of multiple cups of coffee. This combination of caffeine and alcohol was dangerous as the caffeine masked the effects of alcohol causing an increased risk of blackouts and alcohol poisoning. The FDA banned the drinks. Read the following: http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170723105406/https://www.fda.gov/ Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/FoodAdditivesIngredients/ucm233726.htm  Why did the FDA ban these beverages? The FDA banned caffeinated alcoholic drinks because mixing alcohol with caffeine can be dangerous. Caffeine can hide the effects of alcohol, making people feel less drunk than they actually are. This often leads to riskier behavior, like drinking more than they should or putting themselves in dangerous situations, with a higher chance of alcohol poisoning or other serious outcomes.  Did the FDA ban coffee flavored liquors with incidental caffeine? No, the FDA didn’t ban coffee-flavored liquors that naturally contain caffeine from ingredients like coffee. The ban was aimed specifically at malt beverages where caffeine was added separately as an ingredient.  Do you agree with the FDAs decision? The FDA's decision to ban caffeinated alcoholic beverages makes sense from a public health standpoint. These drinks have been associated with serious risks because caffeine can hide some of the signs of intoxication, which might lead people to drink more than they realize. Given the insufficient scientific data proving these products are safe, banning them likely helped prevent harm.  At a bar, you can still order a red-bull vodka and you can still pre-game with jaeger-bombs, does this change your opinion? The FDA banned pre-packaged caffeinated alcoholic beverages and drinks like Red Bull vodka and Jäger bombs can still be found in bars. These combinations present similar risks, as caffeine can also mask signs of intoxication. The ban targeted products that were widely marketed, but it leaves a gap since energy drinks can still be mixed with alcohol in social settings. This could undermine the goal of reducing risks associated with caffeine and alcohol together. Still, the dangers posed by mass-marketed options, especially for inexperienced drinkers, make the FDA’s original decision a necessary precaution.
  2. The current DEA statues arrange drugs into schedules 1-5. Re-write your own drug schedule below. How many classes should there be? Should they still be numbered, or would you prefer a more fun system? There should still be five classes, arranged from high risk to low risk, to make them easier to understand and memorize. In some cases, we can still use numbers for reference. However, instead of sticking to just numbers, we can create a more fun system, a more relatable and engaging format by using creative names and definitions that clearly represent each level of risk and medical use.

V.I.B.E.S.

1. V: Void Zone (Class A) Definition: Super dangerous, and totally illegal. These substances are all risk and have no medical use. Examples: Heroin, LSD, MDMA. 2. I: "Intense Risk" (Class B) Definition: High-risk drugs, but they have legit medical purposes under strict control. Don’t mess with it unless prescribed. Examples: Oxycodone, Fentanyl, Meth. 3. B: Be Cautious (Class C) Definition: Kinda dangerous if abused, but helpful when used right. They serve a purpose. Examples: Benzos, Codeine, Ketamine. 4. E: Everyday Use (Class D) Definition: These are your go-to meds for everyday stuff but still need some caution. Used for common medical purposes. Examples: ADHD meds, Xanax. 5. S: Safe Zone (Class E) Definition: The safest of the bunch. You might even find some of these over-the-counter. They’re the least risky, but even then, moderation is key. Examples: Over-the-counter stuff like cough syrup with low-key codeine or ibuprofen.

  1. Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CccfnRpPtM  What is your opinion on this scandal? The Theranos scandal is a clear example of corporate fraud, where the company deceived investors, regulators, and the public. Elizabeth Holmes and her team made a lot of promises without the science to support them, leading to huge financial losses and, more importantly, putting patients’ lives at risk. This scandal serves as a reminder of the importance of trusting and funding individuals who are genuinely educated and capable of creating real change, rather than charismatic salespeople who can sell ideas without the substance to back them up. In the rush for innovation, especially in places like Silicon Valley, companies can sometimes prioritize hype over results.  Should tech companies have different rules when also exploring medical science?  Yes, tech companies working in medical science should be held to higher standards and stricter regulations than typical tech companies. Unlike a phone malfunction or a software bug, failures in medical technology can directly affect people’s health and safety. These companies also have a responsibility to be transparent and accurate in their claims, making sure there are regular checks in place to prevent misleading the public or investors.