






Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Prepara tus exámenes con los documentos que comparten otros estudiantes como tú en Docsity
Los mejores documentos en venta realizados por estudiantes que han terminado sus estudios
Estudia con lecciones y exámenes resueltos basados en los programas académicos de las mejores universidades
Responde a preguntas de exámenes reales y pon a prueba tu preparación
Consigue puntos base para descargar
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Comunidad
Pide ayuda a la comunidad y resuelve tus dudas de estudio
Descubre las mejores universidades de tu país según los usuarios de Docsity
Ebooks gratuitos
Descarga nuestras guías gratuitas sobre técnicas de estudio, métodos para controlar la ansiedad y consejos para la tesis preparadas por los tutores de Docsity
Un estudio que busca estimar el déficit de profesionales de salud mental en países de ingresos bajos y medios (lmics). El estudio utiliza datos de la organización mundial de la salud (oms) y una aproximación hipotética de un paquete de atención de salud mental para estimar el número de profesionales de salud mental necesarios para atender a la población total de los países estudiados. Los 58 lmics analizados necesitarían aumentar su fuerza laboral de salud mental en 239.000 profesionales equivalentes a tiempo completo para abordar el déficit actual.
Tipo: Guías, Proyectos, Investigaciones
1 / 12
Esta página no es visible en la vista previa
¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!
The mental health workforce gap in low- and middle-income
countries: a needs-based approach
Tim A Bruckner,^ Richard M Scheffier," Gordon Shen,^ Jangho Yoon,"^ Dan Chishoim,^ Jodi Morris,^ Brent D Fulton,'
Mario R Dai Poz^ & Shekhar Saxena'^
Systems (WHO-AIMS). For a detailed
description of the validity and measure-
ment properties of WHO-AIMS, please
refer to Saxena et al."*
Methods
Current mental health workforce
To as.sess the size of the current workforce
devoted to mental health care in the study
countries, we retrieved data from WHO-
AIMS, an assessment tool designed for
LMICs that provides a comprehensive
summary of each country's mental health
system. WHO-AIMS, described in
detail by Saxena et al.," includes 155
indicators covering six domains: policy
and legislative framework, mental health
services, mental health in primary care,
human resources, public education and
monitoring and research. We retrieved
workforce data from the human resources
domain, where LMICs were asked to
report the "number of staff working in
or for mental health facilities or private
practice".'' Respondents provided a count
of professionals of various types, whom
we grouped into three broad professional
categories: psychiatrists, nurses and psy-
chosocial care providers. Nurses included
general nursing staff providing mental
health services and psychiatric nurses;
psychosocial workers included psycholo-
gists, social workers and occupational
therapists. Our rationale for grouping
these categories together was that in
LMICs these professionals often carry
out the same range of tasks. They have
all received formal training in psychol-
ogy, social work or occupational therapy
from a recognized university or technical
school and are responsible for delivering
psychosocial interventions within the
mental health system.
We included in the analysis 58
WHO Member States and territories,
as well as provinces and states within a
country, that were invited to complete
a WHO-AIMS assessment between
February 2005 and June 2009. They were
chosen based on their ability to collect
the required information and their will-
ingness to participate in the study, so in
essence they represented a convenience
sample. For brevity, we shall refer to all
these entities as countries throughout
the paper, but they are not all countries
strictly speaking. We note, however, that
two assessments that were performed at
the regional level (i.e. Hunan, China, and
Uttarakhand, India) were not extrapo-
lated to the respective countries as a whole
and therefore should not be considered
nationally representative.
Needs-based mental health
workforce targets
In its 2008 report, WHO's Mental health
Gap Action Programme (mhGAP)
specified eight problems that LMICs
should prioritize, since they account for
75% of the global burden ot mental and
neurological conditions and substance
abuse disorders. They are depression,
schizophrenia, psychoses other than
schizophrenia, suicide, epilepsy, demen-
tia, the abuse of alcohol and use of illicit
drugs, and paediatric mental disorders."
To meet the priority definition, the
condition must impose substantial dis-
ability, morbidity or mortality, lead to
high economic expenditure or be associ-
ated with violations of human rights.
The mhGAP report contains the best
available scientific and epidemiological
evidence surrounding mental, neurologi-
cal and substance abuse disorders, and the
ones prioritized by WHO have been
common wherever prevalence has been
measured. Moreover, the disorders that
are prioritized are those that substantially
undermine childrens' learning skills and
adults' ability to function within the fam-
ily and in broader society. Because these
conditions are highly prevalent and cause
impairment, they contribute substantially
to the total burden of disease. We refer
the reader to the mhGAP report for more
information."
We used population-based estimates
of the prevalence of these disorders to
make needs-based estimates ofworkforce
requirements. We then applied to this
target population the recommended
health-care service delivery models and
multiplied appropriate staffing ratios
(both adapted from Chisholm et al.)'' to
the expected volume of inpatient and out-
patient services to yield target counts of
psychiatrists, nurses and psychosocial care
providers. Our focus on these workers
led us to exclude all health professionals
outside the sphere of mental health (e.g.
paediatricians and educational system
support staff) and of workers in "mixed
practice". In addition, we did not include
neurologists in the workforce analysis,
as primary care proiessional« in LMICs
where resources are scarce are increasingly
expected to diagnose and treat epilepsy.'"
Prevalence of priority disorders
Since most LMICs do not routinely
conduct their own population-based
surveys, we used sub-regional prevalence
estimates generated as part of the 2004
WHO Global Burden of Disease (GBD)
Project, whose figures come from com-
prehensive reviews and syntheses of the
available epidemiological evidence.' For
the two priority disorders not included
in the 2004 GBD Project (e.g. illicit
substance abuse and paediatric mental
disorders) we obtained population-based
prevalence rates from the peer-reviewed
epidemiologic literature.-'"'' To calculate
the approximate prevalence of suicidal
ideation, we multiplied the GBD rate
of deaths from suicide by a factor of 20,
which is the estimated number of suicidal
ideations per suicide." '"^
Table 1 shows the mean prevalence
of each of the eight priority mhGAP
conditions in the six WHO regions. We
classified illicit substance abuse disorders
and paediatric mental disorders into sub-
categories having distinct requirements in
terms of care and human resource levels.
We multiplied the estimated prevalence
in all the age groups affected by each
disorder to estimate the actual numbers
implicated in each country. This calcula-
tion yielded the total number of cases
meeting the definition given in the ICD-
¿/«Ww (Table 1)."-"
Treatment coverage targets
Target treatment coverage rates for each
disorder were determined on the basis of
three factors: the severity of the disorder,
the ability to detect cases in the popula-
tion and the probability that identified
cases will seek care. Based on these con-
siderations and consistent with estimates
from the literature,'' we established the
following conservative target coverage
rates: 80% for schizophrenia, suicidal
ideation, epilepsy, and dementia; 50% for
use of opioids and other illicit drugs; 33%
for depression; 25% for alcohol abuse;
and 20% for paediatric mental disorders.
We assigned a high treatment coverage
target to schizophrenia because of the
large disability burden attached to it and
the intensity of the symptoms. In contrast,
we set a treatment coverage target of 20%
for paediatric mental disorders since it is
the coverage level normally attained in the
wealthiest high-income countries."'''''
Tim A Bruci<ner et al.
Research I
Mental health workforce gap in low- and middie-inconne countries
e»
I
o
S
.a
I
S.
o,
•i -S
< m
^
J§
o o CO
o CD CM
o
180
180
o o
Ln
O
O
o
o CD o Ln c)
^ Q o
s
)atien
i/isits
carei
100
100
m
jtpatient
o
to
i
.a E
S f
. - m s
"s P
g S
f
o
5
.t— o ^ ë "
*-^ 7- 5 o
•s s S E
UJ TO g ^
l i s t
&«
.ii ™ CO
Su// _WorldHealffi Organ2Q_ 1 ;89;184-194 I doi:10,2471/BLT10.082784 (^) 187
I Research
I Mental health workforce gap in low- and middle-income countries Tim A Bruckner et al.
o <A
u
S, s
£
S
•s
o
C D t n C N J O O C M
co LO f— ^ f ^ m CD co <D c o ^ C D 1 ^ ^ 1 — CCJ C D in h^ CD N ^ I—
u n CN| CNJ Ö (=> h ^
CD cz> t— un c o CNJ o CNJ CO CM T—
CD r r
co
un co o
co un
un co
o
C N J - r ^ C s j i n ^ C O C M C D
r^ o 1 — i n CM
o
1
un
1
o
1
1
1
unCCJ
CD CD C=> CD T—
en
un o
en
ci
co m
O C O C D T — C D C M C O
C M u n C O T — CD C J
C N J c C S u r i c D C D C O C N l C D u n c O C O - ^ C D
T— O O C O C D C O C D i — E C M C T n Z C D C M
oo oo co co
CO CO u n r ^ ^ f— c o CD CD 1— c7> r ^ CD - ^ CD cNJ - ^ T-:
1
o
1 1
1
5:
un co 1
r-- 1
1
un co
1
1
co co 1
1 1
un
1
1 1
1
un
1
un
1
T— T— 1 — 1 — 1 — T— 1 — 1 — •»— 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — - I — T— CM
o CM ( D c o CD o CD CNJ CD ^ - u n CD >-• - ^ CD CD 1-^ cS CNJ CD CD
T— o CM T— CD CM CD 1— " ^ 1— c o CD CD^ CD^ CM o
C D ^ - N - t ^ C D O i — 1— C D C D C M C O u n ' ^ T — CD CD CM CM c o
j C D ^ t c o CX 3 CD r ^ c o CX5 CX 3 C D C J C D C n c b c D
II
o t--^ CM co^ o^ <D^ co^ CD
< D T — 1— C D C M u n C O C O T— O i — C D c n i — C D C M O O C D O O O O C D
C N j c p c D c p c D C D u n c o u n u n c o - i — c D - ^ c o - ^ c o C D C D - r ^ - ^ C O C N J C N J - r - ' o Ö c b i - ^ C D C O - v - ^ T - ^ C D
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
o o o o o o o
çg ^
LU 2
0 1 (^0) co
u ~
•5 E Ou 0
ce
"o iz o ^-
188 Bull World Health Organ 2011 ;89:184-1941 doi: 10.2471/BLT 10.
I Research
for each disorder, treatment setting (e.g.
hospital outpatient) and World Bank
country income classification.
To estimate the full-time-equivalent
staff required to meet inpatient service
targets, we used estimated bed-days as the
starting input. We assumed that hospitals
operate at 85% capacity and applied this
correction factor to obtain the targeted
number of inpatient beds. To calculate the
number of full-time-equivalent inpatient
staff needed to manage the population
affected by each disorder, we multiplied
staff:bed ratios for LMICs extracted from
the literature''''' '- by the targeted number
of inpatient beds.
Workforce shortage or surplus
We summed the needs-based inpatient
and outpatient full-time-equivalent staff
to arrive at a single targeted total, which
we then subtracted from the current staff-
ing levels given in WHO-AIMS. The
difference reflects the magnitude of the
global mental health workforce shortage
(if a negative value) or surplus (if a posi-
tive value).
Results
Current and target staffing levels for
mental health professionals vary widely
both across and within WHO regions
(Table 3). LMICs in the African Region
and the South-East Asia Region report
fewer psychiatrists than the Region of
the Americas or the European Region.
Large within-region variations are
highlighted by the 20-fold difference in
the number of psychiatrists per 100 000
population between the Sudan and the
Islamic Republic of Iran, two middle-
income countries in the Region of the
Eastern Mediterranean (0.06 in the Su-
dan versus 1.19 in the Islamic Republic
of Iran). For all three categories of mental
health professionals, middle-income
countries routinely report a larger
number of staff per population than do
low-income countries.
Across the 58 LMICs in this study,
the estimated number of mental health
professionals required is 362 000 (20 000
psychiatrists, 195 000 nurses and 147000
psychosocial care providers). This repre-
sents an average of 22.3 mental health
professionals per 100 000 population
in low-income countries and of 26.
professionals per 100000 population in
middle-income countries.
The column labelled "difference " in
Table 3 shows the mental health work-
force shortage (—) or surplus (-I-) for each
country. Of the 58 study countries, 67%
showed a shortage of psychiatrists, 95% a
shortage of nurses and 79% a shortage of
psychosocial care providers. In absolute
figures, these workforce deficits amounted
to a total shortage of approximately
11 000 psychiatrists, 128 000 nurses and
100 000 psychosocial care providers.
Thus, an additional 239 000 full-time-
equivalent staff would be needed globally
to treat the current burden of the eight
mental, neurological and substance abuse
problems that WHO has prioritized.
Fig. 1 maps the shortage (or surplus)
for all LMICs in the analysis. Of the
58 countries included, 51 show a short-
age and 9 require at least 20 additional
mental health professionals per 100000
population to meet the needs-based target
levels of care.
Tim A Bruckner et al.
Research
Mental health workforce gap in low- and middle-income countries j
j2 ^^.^
10-
0 -
-10-
-20-
Year
Discussion
Tim A Bruckner et al.
Research I
Mental health workforce gap in low- and middle-income countries |
épilepsie, démence, troubles liés à l'alcoolisme et aux substances illicites
ef troubles mentaux infantiles.
Résultats Tous les pays à revenu faible et 59% des pays à revenu moyen
de notre échantillon disposaient d'un nombre de professionnels largement
inférieur par rapport à leurs besoins en prestations de santé mentale
essentielles. Les 58 PRFI de l'échantillon devraient créer 239 000 emplois
supplémentaires à temps complet dans le secteur de la santé mentale
afin de parer au manque actuel.
Conclusion Des politiques inhérentes à chaque pays sont nécessaires
pour surmonter le vaste manque de personnel et de services de santé
mentale dans les PRFI.
PE3K)ME
HexBaTKa MeAMi^iiHCKMX Ka^poB B o6«acTM oxpaHbi ncMXMMecKoro 3AopoBbfl B CTpaHax c HM3KHM M
AOXO^OM: noflxofl Ha ocHOBe noTpeÔHOCTeii
OueHMTb fleejjMUMT cneqwanHCTOB B o6;iacTM oxpaHbi
nCMXMHeCKOrO 3flOpOBbH B CTpaHax C HM3KMM M CpeflHMM
MeTOffbl MTOÓbl OqeHMTb, CKOnbKO nCMXMaTpOB, I
c e c T e p M nocTaBiuMKOB n c M x o c o q M a / i b H o i i
HeoÓXOflMMO ßjisi npeflocTaBneHMH MeAmíMHCKoíi noMomM B
oónacTM oxpaHbi ncMXMnecKoro 3flopoBbfl Bceiny HaceneHMK)
oócneflyeMbix CTpaH, MM Mcnonb3OBanM ^aHHbie, i
npM npMMeHeHMM p a 3 p a 6 o T a H H o r o B O 3
oiieHKM CMCTeM ncMXMMecKoro 3ÄopoBbH ( M O C n - B O 3 ) B 58
C H C / Í , CTpaHOByK) wH(})opMaiiMio o ópeMeHM pa3nMHHbix
ncMXMiecKMX paccTpoMCTB M TMnoTeTMHecKMM naKeT ycnyr. Mbi
({)OKycMpoBanMCb Ha cneflyioinMx BocbMM npoóneMax, Koxopbie
B O 3 CHMTaeT npiiopMTeTHbiMM: flenpeccMfl, uiM3O(})peHMii,
nCMX03bl, He OTHOCHmMeCK K UIM30<j)peHMM, C
paCCTpOMCTBa, CBfl3aHHbie C
M H e n e r a n b H i i x HapKOTMKOB M
paccTpoMCTBa fleTeM.
Pe3ynbTaTbi Bbi/io o6Hapy>KeHO, HTO BO Bcex CTpaHax c HM3KMM
floxoflOM M B 59% CI paH co cpeflHMM floxoflOM, BxofljimMx B Haiiiy
BbióopKy, cneiiManMCTOB 3HaHMTenbH0 MeHbuie, HeM TpeóyeTC«,
[ npeflocTaBAHTb KTiioHeBOM naKeT Mep BMemaTenbCTBa B
nCMXMHeCKOrO .3AOpOBbH. B 58 C H C f l , BK/IK)HeHHbIX
B BbióopKy, HeoÓXOflMMO yBeHMHMTb OÓlUyiO HMCneHHOCTb
MeflMijMHCKMX KaflpoB B oónacTM oxpaHbi ncMXMHecKoro
3flopoBbH, Ha 2 3 9 0 0 0 cneuManMCTOB B SKBWBaneHTe nonHOÜ
3aHHTOCTM, HTOÓbl yCTpaHMTb HaÓniOflaiOIUMMOI
Una npeofloneHMfl 3HaHMTenbHoro
MeflMUMHCKMX KaflpoB M ycnyr B oónacTM oxpaHbi ncMXMHecKoro
3flOpOBbil HeOÓXOflMMbl IlO/IMTMHeCKMe M6pbl, pa3paÓ0TaHHbie
c yneTOM ycnoBMM KOHKpeTHoii CTpaHbi.
Resumen
La diferencia en la saiud mental de los trabajadores en
basado en las necesidades
Objetivo Calcular la escasez de profesionales psiquiátricos en los paises
de ingresos medios y bajos (PIMB).
Métodos Para calcular el número de psiquiatras, personal de enfermería y
psicólogos que serían necesarios para proporcionar asistencia psiquiátrica
al total de la población de los países estudiados, utilizamos los datos
del Instrumento de Evaluación de los Sistemas de Salud Mental de la
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS-AIMS) de 58 PIMB, la información
específica de cada país sobre la carga de los distintos trastornos mentales
y la prestación hipotética de servicios básicos. Nos centramos en los
ocho problemas siguientes, a los que la OMS ha otorgado prioridad:
depresión, esquizofrenia y otras psicosis, suicidio, epilepsia, demencia,
los países de ingresos medios y bajos: un abordaje
trastornos asociados al abuso del alcohol y las drogas ilegales, así como
los trastornos mentales pediátricos.
Resultados Todos los paises de ingresos bajos y el 59% de los países
de ingresos medios de la muestra tenían muchos menos protesionales
sanitarios de los que necesitarían para proporcionar un conjunto básico
de intervenciones sanitarias en materia de salud mental. Los 58 PIMB
muestreados deberían aumentar su personal sanitario total del área de
psiquiatría a 239 000 protesionales sanitarios a tiempo completo (o
equivalente) para hacer frente a la escasez actual.
Conclusión Para poder superar la gran escasez de trabajadores y servicios
sanitarios en el área de salud mental en todos los PIMB, se necesitan
políticas específicas para cada país.
References
risk tactors: Giobai Burden ot Disease Study Lancet 1997:349:1436-42.
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07495-8 PMID:
in the Asia Pacitic region. Austraias Psycteííy 2004:12(Suppi):S11-5.
PMID:
tamilies ot patients witb schizophrenia. Can JPsyctefiy 2004:49:625-9.
PMiD:
of individuáis with mentai iiiness. int J Rehabii Res 2003:26:123-30.
doi: 10.1097/00004356-200306000-00007 PMiD: 12799606
Chatterjee S, Patei V, Chatterjee A, Weiss HA. Fvaluation ot a community-
based rehabilitation model tor chronic schizophrenia in rural India. BrJ
Psychiatry 2003,182:57-62. doi:10.1192/bjp.182.1.57 PMiD:
Chishoim D, Lund C, Saxena S. Cost ot scaling up mental healthcare in iow- and middle-income countries. BrJ Psychiatry 2007:191:528-35.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp. 107.038463 PMiD: 18055957
Disease control priorities reiated to mentai, neuroiogicai, deveiopmentai and
substance abuse disorders. Geneva: Worid l-leaith Crganization: 2006.
Patei V, Araya R, Chatterjee S, Chishoim D, Cohen A, De Suva M et ai.
Treatment and prevention ot mentai disorders in iow-income and middie- income countries. Lancet 2007:370:991 -1005. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(07)6t 240-9 PMID:
I Research
I Mental health worktorce gap in low- and middle-income countries Tim A Bruckner et al.
EJ et ai. Use of mental heaith services for anxiety, mood, and substance
disorders in 17 countries in the WHO worid mentai health surveys. Lancet
2007;370:841 -50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61414-7 PMiD: 17826169
care. Bull World Health Organ 2004:82:858-66. PMiD:
et ai. Prevaience, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mentai disorders
in the Worid Heaith Organization Worid Mentai Heaith Surveys. JAMA
2004;291:2581-90. doi:10.1001/jama.291.21.2581 PMiD:
up services for mental disorders: a caii for action. í.aííceí2007;370:1241-
neurological, and substance use disorders. Genem: Worid Heaith
Organization: 2008.
Geneva: World Heaith Organization: 2001.
et ai. Barriers to improvement of mentai heaith services in iow-income and
middie-income countries. í.anceí2007:370:1164-74. doi:1O.1O16/SO14O-
6736(07)61263-X PMiD: 17804061
Organization: 2008.
Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems: collecting essential
information for policy and service deiivery. Psyc/?;afrSefv 2007:58:816-21.
doi:10.1176/appi.ps.58.6.816 PMID:
Health Systems. Geneva: Worid Heaith Organization: 2005.
disorders in non-specialized health settings. Geneva: Worid Health
Organization: 2010.
M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Murray CJL, editors. Comparative quantification of
heaith risks. Global and regional burden of diseases attributabie to seiected
major risk factors Geneva: Worid Health Organization: 2004.
global pubiic-health chaiienge. íanceí2007:369:1302-13. doi:10.1016/
SOI 40-6736(07)60368-7 PMID: 17434406
probiem across the globe. JCMcfPsyc/JO/Psycft/ai/y 2008:49:226-36.
doi:10.1111/j.i 469-7610.2007.01855.x PMiD:
et ai. Attempted suicide in Europe: rates, trends and sociodemographic
characteristics of suicide attempters during the period 1989-1992.
Results of the WHO/EURO Muiticentre Study on Parasuicide. Acta Psychiatr
Scand 1996:93:327-38. doi: 10.1111 /j. 1600-0447.1996.tb10656.x
PMiD:
Heeringen K, editors. The international handbook of suicide and attempted
suicide. London: Wiiey: 2000.
Prevalence of dementia in Latin America, india, and China: a popuiation-
based cross-sectional survey, /.anee/2008:372:464-74. doi:10.1016/
SOI 40-6736(08)61002-8 PMID:
retardation among chiidren in Karachi, Pakistan. Am J Epidemiol
1998:147:281-8. PMiD:
Hoimgren G et al. Community-based study of neurological disorders
in rurai centrai Ethiopia. A/euroep/tíem/o/ogy 1990:9:263-77.
doi: 10.1159/000110783 PMiD:
on inteiiectual disability in 0-6-year-oid children in China. J Inteiiect
Disabil Res 2008:52:1029-38. doi:10.1111/j.i 365-2788.2008.01048.x
PMiD:
disorders in a paediatric primary care clinic, ßr JPsycft/af/y 1994:165:527-
and a validation of the Beck Depression inventory among Nigerian
adoiescents. Eur ChildAdolesc Psychiatry 2007:16:287-92. doi:10.1007/
S00787-006-0557-0 PMiD:
and diagnostic guideiines. Geneva: Worid Heaith Organization: 1992.
U.S. chiidren: variation by ethnicity and insurance status. Am J Psychiatry
2002:159:1548-55. dOÍ:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1548PMiD:
SOI40-6736(10)60943-9 PMiD:
disease controi priorities in developing countries. In: Jamison DT, Breman
JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Ciaeson M, Evans DB. editors. Disease controi
priorities in deveioping countries. Nevi/ York: The Worid Bank & Oxford
University Press: 2006. pp. 605-25.
burden of hazardous aicohoi use: a comparative cost-effectiveness analysis.
J Stud Alcohol 2004:65:782-93. PMID:
globai burden of depression: population-level analysis of intervention cost-
effectiveness in 14worid regions. SrJPsyctefo'2004:184:393-403.
doi:10.1192/bip.184.5.393PMID:
R, Mendis N et ai. Schizophrenia treatment in the developing worid: an
interregional and multinational cost-effectiveness analysis. Bull World Health
Organ 2008:86:542-51. doi:10.2471/BLT07.045377 PMID:
national mental heaith programmes. Geneva: World Heaith Organization:
Eerri C, Chisholm D, Van Ommeren M, Prince M. Resource utiiisation for
neuropsychiatrie disorders in developing countries: a muitinationai Deiphi
consensus study SocPsyc/í/aí/yPsyctefrEp/tíem/o/2004:39:218-27.
doi:10.1007/s00127-004-0729-5 PMiD:
mentai health service needs in South Africa. S/^fr Wed J2000:90:1019-24.
PMID:
Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemioi200eA^ :587-94. doi:10.1007/sOOI 27-006-
0057-zPMID:
plans: promoting an optimal mix of services in deveioping countries. IntJ
Ment Health Syst 2004:33:4-16.
for mentai health. Geneva: Worid Heaith Organization: 2003.
Hassier ER, editors. Mental health services in developing countries. Geneva:
World Heaith Organization: 1975. Avaiiabie from: http:)'/whqlibdoc.who.int/
offset/WHO_OEFSET_22_(pt1-pt3).pdf [accessed 8 November 2010].
without mentai health. íanceí 2007:370:859-77. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(07)61238-0 PMiD:
Strategic and Programmatic Actions. Proceedings of the Regionai Conference
on Reform of Mental Health Services: 15 years after the Caracas Declaration,
Brasiiia, 5-8 November 2005.
evidence. Bull World Health Organ 2002:80:575-80. PMID:
Health Organization: 2003.
Human resources for mental health: workforce shortages in iow and middle
income countries. Human Resources for Health Observera. Geneva: World
Health Organization (in press, Eebruary 2011).
Psychol /Wed 2009:39:1759-62. doi:10.1017/S
PMiD:2G
JJ et ai. Mental health systems in countries: where are we now?
¿a/7Cei2007:370:1061-77. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61241 -
PMID: