Download Biosensors with S-Layer Proteins: Reconstitution of Membrane Proteins and Peptides and more Papers Physics in PDF only on Docsity!
biosensors
Article
S-Layer Protein-Based Biosensors
Bernhard Schuster Institute for Synthetic Bioarchitectures, Department of NanoBiotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Muthgasse 11, 1190 Vienna, Austria; bernhard.schuster@boku.ac.at; Tel.: +43-1-47654-
Received: 9 March 2018; Accepted: 9 April 2018; Published: 11 April 2018
Abstract: The present paper highlights the application of bacterial surface (S-) layer proteins as versatile components for the fabrication of biosensors. One technologically relevant feature of S-layer proteins is their ability to self-assemble on many surfaces and interfaces to form a crystalline two-dimensional (2D) protein lattice. The S-layer lattice on the surface of a biosensor becomes part of the interface architecture linking the bioreceptor to the transducer interface, which may cause signal amplification. The S-layer lattice as ultrathin, highly porous structure with functional groups in a well-defined special distribution and orientation and an overall anti-fouling characteristics can significantly raise the limit in terms of variety and the ease of bioreceptor immobilization, compactness of bioreceptor molecule arrangement, sensitivity, specificity, and detection limit for many types of biosensors. The present paper discusses and summarizes examples for the successful implementation of S-layer lattices on biosensor surfaces in order to give a comprehensive overview on the application potential of these bioinspired S-layer protein-based biosensors.
Keywords: biosensor; S-layer protein; crystalline 2D protein lattice; lipid membrane platform; linking matrix; bioreceptor; biomimetics
1. Introduction Biosensor-related research has made tremendous progress over the past four decades, because the advance in electronics, nanolithography, nanobiotechnology, biomimetics, and synthetic biology led to successful routes for combining biological systems with silicon technology. Biosensors are per definition devices, which use a biological recognition element that is retained in direct spatial contact with the transduction system [ 1 ] or, in simplified terms, a device that converts a physical or biological event into a measurable, mostly electrical signal [2]. In general, biosensors comprise of (Figure 1):
(A) a biosensing element or bioreceptor, to which the analyte has a highly specific binding affinity; (B) an interface architecture, which provides an environment for the proper functioning of the biosensing element and where the specific biological event, which gives rise to a certain physical phenomenon takes place; (C) a transducer converting the physical phenomenon or chemical response resulting from the analyte’s interaction with the biological element (e.g., physicochemical, optical, piezoelectric, electrochemical, etc.) into electrical signals. The latter can be reproducibly measured, quantified and processed [3]; and, (D) an associated electronics comprising of signal amplifier, signal processor and an interface, like a display, which finally allows a user-friendly visualization and evaluation of the data [4].
Biosensors 2018 , 8 , 40; doi:10.3390/bios8020040 www.mdpi.com/journal/biosensors
Figure 1. Elements and selected components of an S-layer protein-based quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) biosensor. (A) A biosensing element or bioreceptor comprising of accessible functions like, e.g., an antibody to which the analyte binds with highly specific affinity. (B) An interface architecture comprising of a QCM-D sensor surface covered by a recrystallized S-layer lattice, which provides an environment for the proper functioning of the biosensing element. Here, the specific biological event takes place, which gives rise to a certain physical phenomenon. (C) A transducer converting the physical phenomenon (piezoelectricity) resulting from the analyte’s interaction with the biological element into an electrical signals. (D) Associated electronics comprising of signal amplifier, signal processor and a display allowing for a user-friendly visualization and evaluation of the data.
The biosensing element or bioreceptor is frequently a biologically derived or biomimetic material, like living cell, tissue, enzyme, membrane protein (e.g., ion channel, receptor, pore-forming protein), membrane-active peptide (e.g., ionophore), antibody, nucleic acid, and biological sensitive elements that are created by genetic engineering. The analyte, which binds in a highly specific manner to the bioreceptor may be amongst others ions, nucleic acids, and other organic molecules from cell cultures, human (blood, urine, saliva, tears, sperm, various secretions, etc.) and food samples, and pollutants from environmental samples (e.g., air, water, soil, vegetation). One of the most challenging tasks is to converge biological or biomimetic systems with silicon technology in order to generate the functional interface architecture [ 5 ]. Biological molecules may aggregate or even denature on the surface of electrodes, sensors, or other mostly inorganic solid supports, and hence, loose their function. In order to prevent the loss of function, very frequently an intermediate layer is generated between the biosensing element and the inorganic surface of (ion-sensitive) field-effect transistors, (interdigitated) microarray electrodes, metal-, polymer-, or graphene-coated sensor chips, etc. This intermediate layer comprises either of polymers (e.g., polyethylene glycol, chitosan, agarose, hydrogel, or polyelectrolyte) [ 6 , 7 ], self-assembled monolayers (SAMs; e.g., alkanethiol, dialkylsulfides, silanes, phosphonates) [ 8 – 11 ], or a monomolecular array of self-assembled protein subunits forming surface layers (S-layers) [ 12 – 16 ]. If a lipid membrane is desired as part of the biosensing element, then an incomplete layer of so-called tether molecules replace the rigid SAM [ 17 – 19 ]. Incomplete in the sense that one wants to have only few tether molecules, which anchor the membrane to the surface. This arrangement, where the tether molecules are mixed with so-called spacer molecules ensures a certain retained fluidity of the lipid membrane [ 18 ]. The latter is very important if one wants to reconstitute integral membrane proteins and/or membrane-active peptides functionally in a tethered membrane. In general, a tether molecule is
inherently (zwitterionic) neutral charge of the outer surface of SbpA. Moreover, S-layers are highly porous protein lattices (30% to 70% porosity) with pores that are uniform in size and morphology in the dimension of 2 nm to 8 nm [ 57 – 59 ]. Interestingly, many S-layers possess two or even more distinct classes of pores [42,54,55,60,61].
Figure 2. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of a freeze-etched and metal shadowed preparation of ( a ) an archaeal cell (from Methanocorpusuculum sinense), and ( b ) a bacterial cell (from Desulfotomaculum nigrificans). Bars, 200 nm. Adopted from [ 15 ], copyright (2014) with permission from John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Little is known about the specific biological functions of S-layers, but it is now evident that they can function as protective coats against, e.g., bdellovibrios, bacteriophages, and phagocytosis; can act as molecular sieve, molecule, and ion traps; promoters for cell adhesion; immune-modulators; surface recognition; antifouling coatings; and, virulence factors in pathogenic organisms [ 15 , 58 , 62 , 63 ]. Moreover, the S-layer lattice is important for the determination of cell shape and as a structure that is aiding in the cell division process in archaea [ 64 , 65 ]. Interestingly, microbial S-layer protein arrays from Deinococcus radiodurans show ion-gating properties [ 66 ]. Ion transport appears to be mainly due to an electrical gradient inside the pores, which most probably originate from negatively charged amino acid side chains. The evaluation of the gating characteristics toward various ion species suggests that these S-layer protein arrays constitute a biological ion gate with calcium selectivity [66]. One very important feature of S-layer proteins is the capability of isolated native or recombinantly produced subunits to self-assemble into crystalline arrays on surfaces or interfaces. These surfaces include mica, silicon nitride, silicon oxide, glass, noble metals, like platinum, gold, titanium, stainless steel, but also many polymers, like cellulose, polyester, polystyrene, and technically relevant materials, including graphene, indium tin oxide, and highly oriented pyrolytic graphite [ 56 , 67 ]. TEM [ 68 – 70 ] and AFM [ 71 – 73 ] are the most appropriate techniques to elucidate the recrystallization process of S-layer proteins. Crystal growth at interfaces (e.g., solid supports, air-water interface, or lipid membranes) starts simultaneously at many randomly distributed nucleation points. Subsequently, it proceeds in plane until the crystalline domains meet, thus leading to a closed, coherent mosaic of individual, several micrometer large S-layer patches [ 71 , 74 – 76 ]. A low monomer concentration, which corresponds to a low number of nucleation sites, favors the growth of extended S-layer patches. The monocrystalline, individual patches are separated by grain boundaries [71]. The formation of a coherent crystalline lattice depends on the used S-layer protein species, the environmental conditions of the subphase (i.e., ionic content and strength, pH-value), and on the
surface properties of the interface. Interestingly, S-layer lattice can exhibit against cells in tissue cultures either cell adhesive (cytophilic) or cell repulsive (cytophobic) surface properties, depending whether the inner or outer side, respectively, faces the aqueous environment. Adjusting the recrystallization protocol from a basic condition (pH 9; resulting in an exposed outer, smooth cytophobic side) to an acidic condition (pH 4; resulting in an exposed inner rough, cytophilic surface pattern) results in the different orientation, and thus, function of the S-layer protein lattice [77]. While the reassembly of S-layer proteins at the air-water interface and at planar lipid films is well defined [ 69 , 70 , 78 – 80 ], the deliberate modification of the surface properties of a solid support allows for specifically controlling the reassembly process [ 71 , 75 , 81 – 83 ]. For example, the S-layer protein SbpA, which is one of the most extensively studied S-layer proteins for functionalizing solid supports, forms monolayers with a height of 9 nm on the hydrophobic surface. In contrast, SbpA forms on hydrophilic silicon supports a double layer with an interdigitated-toothed rack-like structure with a height of 15 nm [ 71 ]. Furthermore, in comparison to hydrophilic surfaces, the layer formation is much faster on hydrophobic supports because it starts from many different nucleation sites, and thus, leads to a mosaic of small crystalline domains [47]. In general, the S-layer is, on the one hand side, utilized as very precise immobilization matrix to present various biomolecules, including bioreceptors, in a unique manner [ 15 , 84 , 85 ]. On the other hand side, this protein-based intermediate layer constitutes also a versatile base plate for the generation of supported lipid membranes, which provide the essential environment for the reconstitution of functional membrane proteins and membrane-active peptides [41,86,87]. Great potential as patterning elements and nanoscale building blocks is evident for native S-layer proteins. However, genetic approaches open up the possibility of modifying and tuning the natural properties of S-layer proteins [ 88 , 89 ]. Nevertheless, one has to take care that the S-layer proteins comprising inserted or fused foreign functions or protein domains retrain their capability to self-assemble into geometrically well-defined layers. The most relevant advantages of genetically engineered S-layers over less nanostructured approaches are the periodicity of functional domains in the nanometer range. To date, the generation of S-layer fusion proteins occurs through the homologous expression and the secretion by cells or inside a host organism, which is, in most cases, Escherichia coli [89,90]. Both of the strategies result in bio-inspired materials with designed functional properties. Moreover, the possibility to fuse single or multifunctional domains of other proteins to S-layer proteins opens up a broad spectrum of applications ranging from biosorption of heavy metals, formation of nanoparticle arrays, vaccine development, over immobilized biocatalysts, fluorescent biomarkers, and diagnostic tools to sensor development [ 15 , 50 , 91 , 92 ]. In this context, it is interesting to note that S-layer fusion proteins presenting domains for the covalent binding of lipid molecules constitute a very promising strategy to enhance the stability of the so-called S-layer supported lipid membrane (SsLM) [ 93 – 97 ]. Finally, co-recrystallization of different S-layer fusion proteins will lead to a high flexibility for the variation of functional groups within a single S-layer array.
3. Modified S-Layers as Components in Biosensors S-layers represent one of the few examples in nature, where proteins reveal the intrinsic capability to self-assemble into monomolecular lattices. In general, the S-layers represent an ideal patterning element for nanobiotechnological and biomimetic applications [ 41 , 50 , 52 , 98 – 100 ]. Particularly, the repetitive physicochemical properties and isoporosity of this proteinaceous lattice structure down to the sub-nanometer scale make them to unique matrices and building blocks. The prime attractiveness of such ‘bottom-up’ strategies is not only their capability to assemble into uniform nanostructures, but also the possibility to exploit these structures at the meso- and macroscopic scale. Moreover, the cloning and characterization of genes encoding S-layer proteins opens new areas for applied S-layer research as the incorporation of single or multifunctional domains is now feasible without the loss of their self-assembly capability [ 88 ]. However, as S-layers significantly differ in their inner and outer surface with regard to their topography and physicochemical properties, it is essential
composite system consisting of the metal/enzyme/two-dimensional (2D)-protein layer arrangement can successfully serve as highly efficient biosensors. The accurate on-line detection of glucose in blood is a challenging task because many blood components disturb the measurement. As S-layer lattices constitute ultrathin and highly hydrated materials [ 121 ], Picher et al. designed a lab-on-a-chip comprising of embedded amperometric sensors in four S-layer-coated micro-reactors, which can be addressed individually [ 56 ]. The S-layer had the function to provide an efficient antifouling coating, a highly-oriented immobilization matrix for the GOx, and an effective molecular sieve. Moreover, the S-layer protein SbpA readily formed monomolecular lattice structures on the surface of various microchips (e.g., gold, glass, polydimethylsiloxane, platinum) within 60 min. The microfluidic device operated in a feedback loop mechanism in order to assess the natural variations in blood glucose levels during hemodialysis, and thus, to allow for the individual adjustment of glucose. To ensure reliable and accurate detection of glucose in blood the lab-on-a-chip performed simultaneously blood glucose measurements, mediator-interferences detection, background subtractions, and auto-calibration routines. The highly isoporous SbpA-coating eliminated unspecific adsorption events in the presence of freshly drawn blood samples, human serum albumin, and plasma. Most important, the undisturbed diffusion of the mediator to the electrode surface enabled electrochemical measurements of glucose in the range from 0.5 mM to 50 mM [56]. Hence, this combination of biologically derived nanostructured surfaces with microchip technology constitutes a powerful tool for the multiplexed analysis of complex samples. The bioreceptor in cholesterol biosensors is very commonly the cholesterol oxidase (ChOx). A simple and reliable method to prepare reproducible and stable ChOx monolayers was to spread the ChOx at the water–air interface. Mixed films comprising of ChOx and S-layer proteins showed a long-term stability at the air-water interphase [ 122 ]. In a further study, the mixed film was transferred onto the surface of screen-printed carbon electrodes by the Langmuir-Blodgett technique [ 123 ]. Characterization of the modified electrode surface occurred with AFM and cyclic voltammetry (CV). AFM indicated the presence of deposited layers, which also resulted in a reduction of the surface roughness of the electrodes. As demonstrated by CV, the presence of S-layer proteins in the ChOx Langmuir-Blodgett film increased the oxidation peak intensity and reduced the oxidation potential. Therefore, these results showed the feasibility of producing a cholesterol biosensor that was based on the immobilization of a mixed film comprising of ChOx and S-layer proteins on screen-printed carbon electrodes [123]. For the development of oxygen sensors, an oxygen sensitive Pt(II) porphyrin dye was covalently bound to the S-layer matrix [ 124 ]. Setups comprising of low cost optoelectronic components, like light emitting diodes and silicon photodiodes, measured the oxygen concentration by phase modulation fluorimetry. Variations in the oxygen concentrations resulted in distinct and reproducible changes in the luminescence lifetime and intensity for planar and fiber optic sensor setups. The luminescence quenching efficiency of these sensors was found to be 1.5–1.9 (expressed as the ratio of signal under nitrogen and air), which compares well to other sensor systems using luminophores that are embedded in polymer matrices. These results demonstrated the application potential of S-layers as immobilization matrices in the development of biosensors [ 124 ]. Hence, the general principle for the construction of optical sensors by immobilization of various dyes, fluorophores and/or receptors on ultrathin S-layer protein coatings led already to methods for the sensing of manifold analytes. In a recent study, a monomolecular S-layer lattice comprising of the S-layer protein SbpA that was conjugated with folate was recrystallized on a gold surface [ 39 ]. This biorecognition layer ensured the specific capture of human breast adenocarcinoma cells (MCF-7) via the recognition of folate receptors, which are expressed on the surface of MCF-7. The fabricated acoustic and electrochemical sensors were able to distinguish between MCF-7 and human liver hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells as the latter do not express folate receptors. This biosensor offers several advantages, including the small thickness of the SbpA lattice, which increases cells’ capturing efficiency. Moreover, there is no requirement to block the surface due to the antifouling properties of the S-layer lattice and no awareness
of antibody immobilization as folate can be used as an alternative to the antibody for capturing target cells. Several techniques provided evidence for the efficiency of this biosensor. QCM-D measurements tracked the formation of SbpA-folate modified sensor and the capturing of cancer cells efficiently in real-time and under controlled conditions. Although the QCM-D technique shows a limited detection range, it allows for tracking the cell viability [ 39 ]. Hence, the cellular response to chemotherapeutic agents is worth to be investigated in further QCM-D studies. Indeed, electrochemical measurements confirm the selectivity and the specificity of the developed biosensor and provide a simple, rapid, cost-effective, and disposable analysis of cancer detection. Moreover, the development of efficient biosensors for accurate diagnosis helps to increase the cure and the survival rates of patients with cancer and provides great promise for an effective analysis with high selectivity and sensitivity. In another study, chemical crosslinkers linked a thrombin-binding aptamer and an ofloxacin-binding aptamer to different to S-layer proteins isolated from L. sphaericus JG-A12 and L. sphaericus JG-B53. [ 125 ]. S-layer protein monomers were not able to crystallize after aptamer modification and showed no thrombin binding during random surface attachment. In contrast, aptamers that were linked to an intact S-layer in suspension or an S-layer coating were still functional. Laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy, resonant mirror sensory, and QCM-D verified the functionality of both aptamers through target binding after S-layer immobilization on solid supports [125]. The S-layer protein from L. sphaericus JG-A12 was bound on a gold surface in order to fabricate a uranyl (UO 2 2+) biosensor. Immobilization occurred either by the binding of the cysteine of the S-layer protein to a SAM, which presented maleimide groups or to a mixed SAM presenting biotin, which bound neutravidin and the latter subsequently to the biotinylated S-layer protein [ 126 ]. The biosensor responded to picomolar levels of aqueous uranyl ions within minutes and showed higher stability and longer electrode life span in comparison to traditional SAM-based biosensors. The biosensors detected specifically UO 2 2+-ions with a detection limit of 10−^12 M. Chemical modification of the phosphate and carboxyl groups of the S-layer protein prevented UO 2 2+ binding, indicating that both of the moieties are involved in the recognition to UO 2 2+^ [ 126 ]. The same S-layer protein, was adsorbed on gold nanoparticles. The functionalized gold nanoparticles aggregated in the presence of arsenic species and resulted in a color change from burgundy-red for widely dispersed nanoparticles to blue for aggregated nanoparticles. By this means, a concentration of the anionic arsenic (V) complex lower than 24 ppb was detectable [ 127 ]. In future, it might be possible that S-layer protein isolates from bacteria surviving in other metal polluted sites may provide the sensing components for the fabrication of further biosensors for the detection of other metal ions.
4. Genetically Engineered S-Layers as Components in Biosensors Their intrinsic self-assembly properties as well as their periodicity make S-layers ideal building blocks for all kinds of detection systems, like DNA-, aptamer-, protein-, allergy-, or antibody-chips, as well as label-free detection systems (for review see [15,52]). The construction of S-layer-streptavidin fusion proteins carrying core-streptavidin either at the N-terminus or C-terminus allowed for the generation of universal affinity matrices for the specific binding of biotinylated molecules like, e.g., proteins, allergens, antibodies, oligonucleotides, or nanoparticles [ 89 , 128 ]. Another application potential is in the development of label-free detection systems. The specific binding of functional molecules to the sensor chip functionalized with an oriented chimaeric S-layer can be measured directly by determining the change in mass on the chip. In addition, there is no need for any labeling if the applied transducer relies upon surface-sensitive techniques, like QCM-D, SPR, or SAW. Proof-of-principle for label-free detection systems based on S-layer proteins was performed with the S-layer fusion protein incorporating the sequence of a variable domain of a heavy chain camel antibody directed against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) [ 129 , 130 ]. A monomolecular lattice comprising of S-layer fusion protein recrystallized on gold chips constituted the sensing layer
these organisms to be able to dwell under extreme environmental conditions, such as temperatures up to 120 ◦C, pH down to 0, high hydrostatic pressure, or high salt concentrations [ 42 , 137 , 138 ]. Hence, S-layer lattices may therefore be very important to provide basic functions, like mechanical and osmotic cell stabilization [ 139 , 140 ]. So far, S-layer proteins from Gram-positive bacteria are used in the generation of SsLMs because suitable methods for the disintegration of archaeal S-layer protein lattices and their reassembly into monomolecular arrays are not available [ 41 , 93 , 95 , 97 , 98 , 141 ]. In addition, a second S-layer as a protective molecular sieve, stabilizing scaffold, and antifouling layer can be self-assembled on the top of the SsLM (Figure 3E,F). These features make S-layer lattices unique supporting architectures, resulting in lipid membranes with nanopatterned fluidity and considerably extended longevity [41,93–95,97,98,142–144].
Figure 3. Scheme of natural and surface layer (S-layer) supported lipid membranes. Supramolecular structure of an archaeal cell envelope comprising of a cytoplasma membrane, archaeal S-layer proteins incorporated in the lipidic matrix and integral membrane proteins ( A ). Schematic illustrations of various S-layer-supported lipid membranes. ( B ) Lipid monolayer films at the air/water interphase with a recrystallized S-layer lattice underneath. (1) Tetraether lipid monolayer in the upright conformation. (2) Tetraether lipid monolayer in the U-shaped (bent) conformation. (3) Phospholipid monolayer. ( C ) A tetraether lipid monolayer membrane is generated across an orifice of a patch clamp pipette by the tip–dip method. Subsequently a closely attached S-layer lattice is formed by bacterial S-layer proteins on one side of the lipid membrane. In ( D ), a folded or painted bilayer phospholipid membrane spanning a Teflon aperture is shown. A closed bacterial S-layer lattice can be self-assembled on either one or both (not shown) sides of the lipid membrane. ( E ) Schematic drawing of a solid support where a closed bacterial S-layer lattice has been assembled. On this biomimetic structure, a tetraether lipid membrane was generated by the modified Langmuir-Blodgett method. Optionally as shown on the left side, a bacterial S-layer lattice can be attached on the external side of the solid supported lipid membrane. ( F ) Scheme of a bilayer lipid membrane generated on an S-layer ultrafiltration membrane. Optionally as shown on the left side, a bacterial S-layer lattice can be attached on the external side of the S-layer ultrafiltration membrane (SUM)-supported lipid membrane. In B to F, the head groups of the lipid molecules interacting with the S-layer protein are marked in dark. As indicated in C to F, all S-layer-supported model lipid membranes can be functionalized by biomolecules like membrane-active peptides and integral membrane proteins. Modified after [ 63 ], copyright (2004) with permission from Wiley-VCH.
The interaction of the S-layer proteins SbpA and SbsB with lipid molecules has been investigated in detail [ 78 – 80 , 145 ]. It turned out that most probably negatively charged moieties on the S-layer protein interact via electrostatic interaction with the head groups of zwitterionic and/or positively charged lipids (Table 1). As natural, wild-type S-layer proteins frequently possess a so-called S-layer homologous domain, which interacts with the secondary cell wall polymer, the latter can be coupled to the head group of a lipid and the lipid can be immobilized via a lectin-type like binding on the S-layer protein [ 18 ]. The recrystallized S-layer protein can also be chemically modified in order to bind lipids with head groups comprising of a primary amine group [ 146 , 147 ], thiol group [ 148 ], or maleimide group (Table 1). Moreover, a linker, like, e.g., streptavidin, can be coupled to the S-layer protein, which allows for a strong ligation of biotinylated lipids [ 149 , 150 ]. Finally, genetically engineered S-layer proteins may expose either a thiol group from an introduced cysteine, multiple histidine residues (His-tag), streptavidin, or a strept-tag (Table 1). These modifications allow for the coupling of lipids carrying a maleimide group [ 151 – 153 ], nickel(II)-nitrilotriacetic acid anchor [ 154 ], or biotin at their head group region [73,155,156], respectively. In general, S-layer proteins can be recrystallized on either a lipid monolayer generated at the air-water interface (Figure 3B), a preformed lipid membrane like a planar, freestanding lipid bilayer (Figure 3C,D), or a spherical liposome or emulsome (Figure 4). Moreover, the lipid membrane can be generated on an already existing recrystallized S-layer lattice (Figure 3E,F). The latter approach is the method of choice to generate functional lipid membrane platforms, which are, beside other applications, a straightforward approach in the development of biosensors [41,144]. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching measurements determined the fluidity of SsLMs prepared by the Langmuir-Blodgett/Langmuir-Schaefer technique, silane-supported, and dextran-supported phospholipid bilayer [ 157 ]. The highest nanopatterned fluidity of the lipids showed the SsLMs as compared to the other supported bilayers. This is most probably due to the repetitive local interaction of the S-layer lattice with the lipid head groups. In another study, it was feasible to generate phospholipid bilayers and tetraether lipid monolayers on S-layer covered gold electrodes. A very exciting result was that the tetraether lipid monolayer with an S-layer lattice on both sides (Figure 3E) revealed an exceptional long-term robustness of approximately one week [41,93,96–98]. The generation of lipid membranes on porous supports combines the advantage of easy manual handling, individual excess to both membrane surfaces, and possessing an essentially unlimited ionic reservoir on each side of the bilayer lipid membrane (BLM; Figure 3F). However, the ultrastructure of the porous support, like roughness or strong heterogeneity in the size of the pore diameters, has a significant impact on the stability of the attached BLM [ 158 ]. Hence, a straightforward approach is the utilization of SUMs with the S-layer acting as a stabilizing and anchoring structure and as a smoothening layer, which reduces the roughness of the porous support [159–161]. S-layer fragments deposited as a coherent layer on microfiltration membranes are forming the SUM [ 109 , 111 , 162 ]. The mechanical and chemical stability of the SUM is subsequently introduced by chemical inter- and intramolecular cross-linking [ 109 , 110 , 162 – 164 ]. The S-layer lattice with its uniformity of functional groups on the surface and within the pore area permits the very accurate chemical modifications in the sub-nanometer range. These modifications enable the tuning of the molecular sieving as well as antifouling characteristics of SUMs [ 162 , 163 , 165 ]. Moreover, SUMs can be prepared with different net charges and hydrophobic or hydrophilic surface properties. These features make SUMs very attractive as stabilizing and supporting structures for the functional lipid membranes [15,41,94,97,144]. SUM-supported phospholipid bilayers were highly isolating structures with a lifetime of up to 17 h [ 159 – 161 ], whereas BLMs on plain microfiltration membranes revealed a life-time of only approximately 3 h. The lifetime increased significantly to about 24 h by the attachment of an S-layer lattice on both sides of the lipid membrane (Figure 3F) [ 159 , 160 ]. The crosslinking of those lipid head groups, which are direct in contact with domains on the S-layer protein may result in a further increase of the longevity of this composite membrane architecture, and is thus a promising strategy for generating stable and fluid lipid membranes [86].
Table 2. Membrane-active peptides. Summary of membrane-active peptides incorporated in S-layer supported lipid membranes (modified after [41]).
Membrane-Active Peptide Source Remarks References gramicidin A(gA) Bacillus brevis linear pentadeca peptide [161] alamethicin(Ala) Trichoderma viride linear, 20 amino acids [159] valinomycin (Val) (^) S. tsusimaensisseveral^ Streptomyces and S. fulvissimus^ strains, e.g.,^ cyclic dodecadepsi peptide,12 amino acids and esters [141,159] peptidyl-glycine-leucine- carboxyamide (PGLa) analogue synthesized via protein chemistry^
20 amino acid; negatively charged analogue of PGLa [168]
Finally, SsLMs provided also a proper matrix for the functional incorporation of alamethicin (Table 2). The addition of amiloride, which is an inhibitor for alamethicin, resulted in a specific blocking of the alamethicin channels as increasing amounts of amiloride gave rise to a significant increase in membrane resistance [ 159 ]. Thus, this result provided proof-of-concept for the applicability of these composite S-layer/lipid structures for biosensing purposes. In future, the ability to reconstitute membrane-active peptides like antimicrobial ones in defined structures on, e.g., sensor surfaces is of high importance for the design and fabrication of biomimetic sensing devices [41,171–173]. The reconstitution of integral membrane proteins in SsLMs was also successful (Table 3). For example, α-hemolysin (αHL), which is a pore-forming heptameric protein formed functional pores in SUM-supported phospholipid bilayers but no pore formation was achieved for BLMs that were generated on plain microfiltration membranes. Interestingly, with SUM-supported lipid membranes, even single αHL pore recordings are feasible [160].
Table 3. Transmembrane proteins. Summary of transmembrane proteins reconstituted in S-layer supported lipid membranes (modified after [41]).
Transmembrane Protein Source Remarks References α-hemolysin (αHL) exotoxin from Staphylococcus aureus pore-forming; homo-heptamer [144,160] ryanodine receptor 1 (RyR1) skeletal muscle cells^
Ca2+-release channel; homotetramer [174] nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR)
plasma membranes of neurons; on postsynaptic side of the neuromuscular junction
ligand gated ion channel; 5 subunits [154] voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC)
located on the outer mitochondrial membrane; also produced by cell-free expression
porin, voltage gated; ion channel monomeric but can cluster [175]
The reconstitution of the integral ryanodine receptor, RyR1 (Table 3), which was isolated from rabbit muscle cells was also successful in SsLMs [ 174 ]. For formation of SsLMs by the newly developed β-diketone ligand europium-triggered vesicle fusion technique [ 147 ], resulted in isolating lipid membranes. Depending on the type of measurement, the SsLM formation occurred either on glass surfaces (for fluorescence experiments) or on gold sensors (for QCM-D measurements). Preliminary measurements clearly indicated that incorporation of RyR1 took place. This was verified by control experiments to exclude misinterpretation due to unspecific adsorption of RyR1 to the bilayer or the S-layer lattice [ 174 ]. Nevertheless, further experiments, like, e.g., combined QCM-D with EIS studies on SsLMs or patch clamp measurements on a chip, will help to implement SsLMs as a versatile and stabilizing scaffold for detailed studies on the impact of different drugs on reconstituted RyR1 in high-throughput screening-like devices. The addition of the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC; Table 3) to a preformed SsLM caused a significant decrease in membrane resistance, whereas the membrane capacitance did not change significantly [ 147 ]. Moreover, an increasing VDAC concentration led to a decrease of the membrane resistance, indicating an increasing number of spontaneously reconstituted VDAC channels in the SsLM [ 175 ]. VDAC is a voltage-gated channel, which is at high membrane potentials in the closed state and switches to an open state at low membrane potentials (less than10 mV) [ 176 – 178 ]. Indeed, VDAC channels that are reconstituted in SsLMs clearly showed the above described behaviour. Furthermore, the membrane
resistance decreased again after reducing the voltage from 10 mV back to zero, but the resistance remained higher when compared to the first measurement. The reason for this may be the re-opening of some channels while others remain closed. In addition, it is conceivable that keeping the channels in the closed state for a long period during the measurements may reduce the rate of re-opening of VDAC and cause some structural rearrangements in order to achieve a more stable closed conformation [ 177 , 179 ]. Moreover, the presence of the nucleotides nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydride (NADH) or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate hydrogen induce channel closure, leading to a significantly reduced conductance of the VDAC channels [ 180 – 183 ]. Indeed, the addition of NADH to the VDAC channel reconstituted in SsLM caused a significant increase in the membrane resistance, which strongly evidenced the blocking of VDAC channels by NADH molecules [175]. All the before mentioned examples for the functional reconstitution of membrane-active peptides and membrane proteins in SsLMs are currently proof-of-principle studies. There is, however, a strong desire to use SsLMs, particularly for probing the function of membrane proteins, e.g., in drug screening applications. The fact that membrane proteins currently comprise more than 50% of all drug targets and many of these membrane proteins are directly involved in various transfer processes across the membrane demonstrate the importance of performing detailed studies on the structure and function of membrane proteins [ 184 , 185 ]. A direct electrical readout of membrane functions, e.g., of ionic currents generated by ion channels, provides the advantage of a signal amplification. There is no need for any labelling, as it is mandatory for many current state-of-the-art techniques that are used for membrane protein screening. Vesicular lipid structures, like unilamellar liposomes, comprising of a closed, spherical lipid mono- or bilayer with an aqueous inner space and emulsomes, comprising of a solid fat core that is surrounded by lipid layers are mainly used as drug targeting and drug delivery systems [ 186 , 187 ]. However, these lipid nanoparticles can also be used as biosensors for diagnosis purposes if the drug is replaced or is supplemented by a radiotracer, contrast agent, or a fluorescent dye. The use of molecular imaging to non-invasively measure the in vivo distribution of nanomedicines becomes increasingly important [ 188 ]. Labeling the nanoparticle gives also an indication of delivery to the target tissue. In this context, it is worth mentioning that liposomes and emulsomes can be covered by an S-layer lattice (Figure 4A,B) [ 150 , 189 – 192 ]. In addition, the S-layer lattice may be functionalized with, e.g., antibodies in order to detect cancer cells (Figure 4C). Moreover, S-layer-coated and with labelling agents loaded liposomes or emulsomes may be used for molecular imaging to detect, e.g., inflammations in a body.
Figure 4. S-layer-coated liposomes and emulsomes. TEM images of emulsomes coated with the S-layer protein SbsB from Geobacillus stearothermophilus PV72/p2 ( A ) wildtype SbsB and ( B ) recombinant SbsB. The bars correspond to 100 nm. Adopted from [ 191 ], copyright (2013) with permission from Wiley-VCH. ( C ) Schematic drawing of (1) an S-layer coated emulsomes (left) and Iiposome (right) with entrapped functional molecules and (2) functionalized by reconstituted integral proteins. Note, S-layer coated emulsomes can only transport hydrophobic molecules but with a much higher transport capacity. S-layer coated emulsomes and liposomes can be used as immobilization matrix for functional molecules (e.g., human IgG) either by direct binding (3) or by immobilization via the Fc-specific ligand protein A (4), or biotinylated ligands can be bound to the S-layer coated liposome or emulsomes via the biotin—avidin system (5). Alternatively, emulsomes or liposomes can be coated with genetically modified S-layer subunits incorporating functional domains (6). Modified after [61], copyright (2002) with permission from Wiley-VCH.
Miniaturization of membrane platforms in a chip format reduces the volume of needed biological material and allows for very sensitive recording of single membrane protein activities. Miniaturized membrane platforms are very promising in the field of drug discovery due to the possibility to directly record membrane protein functionality when they are exposed, e.g., to lead compounds and drug candidates. At present, the research on biosensor is not only driving the ever-accelerating race to construct devices that are more efficient, smaller, and cheaper, but may also ultimately result in the successful integration of electronic and biological systems, and hence, in novel electronic sensing technologies.
Acknowledgments: The financial support provided by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project P 29399-B22 is gratefully acknowledged. Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations 2D two-dimensional αHL α-hemolysin AFM atomic force microscopy BLM bilayer lipid membrane CD133 tumor marker ChOx cholesterol oxidase CV cyclovoltammetry EBV Epstein-Barr virus EIS electrochemical impedance spectroscopy GOx glucose oxidase HepG2 human liver carcinoma cells IgG immunoglobulin G MCF-7 human breast adenocarcinoma cell nAChR nicotinic acetylcholine receptor NADH nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydride PGLa(-) negatively charged analogue of peptidyl-glycylleucine-carboxyamide PSA prostate-specific antigen QCM-D quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring RyR1 ryanodine receptor/Ca2+^ release channel rSbpA/Lac recombinant fusion protein comprising of SbpA and laccase rSbpA/ZZ recombinant fusion protein comprising of SbpA and two copies of the Fc-binding Z-domain (a synthetic analogue of the IgG-binding domain of protein A from Staphylococcus aureus) SAM self-assembled monolayer SAW surface acoustic waves SbpA S-layer protein of Lysinibacillus sphaericus CCM 2177 SbsB S-layer protein of Geobacillus stearothermophilus PV72/p S-layer two dimensional arrays of proteinaceous subunits forming surface layers on prokaryotic cells SPR surface plasmon resonance SsLM S-layer supported lipid membrane SUM S-layer ultrafiltration membrane TEM transmission electron microscopy TIRFM total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy VDAC voltage-dependent anion channel
References
- Thévenot, D.R.; Toth, K.; Durst, R.A.; Wilson, G.S. Electrochemical biosensors: Recommended definitions and classification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2001 , 16 , 121–131. [CrossRef]
- Dugas, V.; Elaissari, A.; Chevalier, Y. Surface sensitization techniques and recognition receptors immobilization on biosensors and microarrays. In Recognition Receptors in Biosensors; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 47–134.
- Turner, A.P.F. Biosensors: Fundamentals and applications—Historic book now open access. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015 , 65. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cavalcanti, A.; Shirinzadeh, B.; Zhang, M.; Kretly, L.C. Nanorobot hardware architecture for medical defense. Sensors 2008 , 8 , 2932–2958. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmidt, J.J.; Montemagno, C.D. Bionanomechanical systems. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2004 , 34 , 315–337. [CrossRef]
- Sackmann, E. Supported membranes: Scientific and practical applications. Science 1996 , 271 , 43–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rädler, J.; Sackmann, E. Functionalization of solids by ultrathin soft polymer films and polymer/lipid film composites: Modeling of cell surfaces and cell recognition processes. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 1997 , 2 , 330–336. [CrossRef]
- Dubey, M.; Weidner, T.; Gamble, L.J.; Castner, D.G. Structure and order of phosphonic acid-based self-assembled monolayers on Si(100). Langmuir 2010 , 26 , 14747–14754. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lessel, M.; Bäumchen, O.; Klos, M.; Hähl, H.; Fetzer, R.; Paulus, M.; Seemann, R.; Jacobs, K. Self-assembled silane monolayers: An efficient step-by-step recipe for high-quality, low energy surfaces. Surf. Interface Anal. 2015 , 47 , 557–564. [CrossRef]
- Lvov, Y.; Decher, G.; Möhwald, H. Assembly, structural characterization, and thermal behavior of layer-by-layer deposited ultrathin films of poly(vinyl sulfate) and poly(allylamine). Langmuir 1993 , 9 , 481–486. [CrossRef]
- Vericat, C.; Vela, M.E.; Benitez, G.; Carro, P.; Salvarezza, R.C. Self-assembled monolayers of thiols and dithiols on gold: New challenges for a well-known system. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010 , 39 , 1805–1834. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sleytr, U.B.; Bayley, H.; Sara, M.; Breitwieser, A.; Küpcü, S.; Mader, C.; Weigert, S.; Unger, F.M.; Messner, P.; Jahn-Schmid, B.; et al. VI. Applications of S-layers. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1997 , 20 , 151–175. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sleytr, U.B.; Egelseer, E.M.; Ilk, N.; Messner, P.; Schäffer, C.; Pum, D.; Schuster, B. Prokaryotic cell wall components: Structure and biochemistry nanobiotechnological applications of S-layers. In Prokaryotic Cell Wall Compounds: Structure and Biochemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 459–481.
- Sleytr, U.B.; Egelseer, E.M.; Ilk, N.; Pum, D.; Schuster, B. S-Layers as a basic building block in a molecular construction kit. FEBS J. 2007 , 274 , 323–334. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sleytr, U.B.; Schuster, B.; Egelseer, E.M.; Pum, D. S-layers: Principles and applications. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014 , 38 , 823–864. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sleytr, U.B.; Schuster, B.; Egelseer, E.M.; Pum, D.; Horejs, C.M.; Tscheliessnig, R.; Ilk, N. Nanobiotechnology with S-layer proteins as building blocks. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2011 , 103 , 277–352. [PubMed]
- Heibel, C.; Ruehe, J.; Knoll, W. Tethered Membranes on Solid Supports; American Chemical Society, Polymer Preprints, Division of Polymer Chemistry: Blackburg, VA, USA, 1997; pp. 956–957.
- Knoll, W.; Naumann, R.; Friedrich, M.; Robertson, J.W.F.; Lösche, M.; Heinrich, F.; McGillivray, D.J.; Schuster, B.; Gufler, P.C.; Pum, D.; et al. Solid supported lipid membranes: New concepts for the biomimetic functionalization of solid surfaces. Biointerphases 2008 , 3 , FA125–FA135. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sinner, E.K.; Ritz, S.; Naumann, R.; Schiller, S.; Knoll, W. Self-assembled tethered bimolecular lipid membranes. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2009 , 49 , 159–179. [PubMed]
- Knoll, W.; Köper, I.; Naumann, R.; Sinner, E.K. Tethered bimolecular lipid membranes-A novel model membrane platform. Electrochim. Acta 2008 , 53 , 6680–6689. [CrossRef]
- Sinner, E.K.; Knoll, W. Functional tethered membranes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001 , 5 , 705–711. [CrossRef]
- Jackman, J.A.; Knoll, W.; Cho, N.J. Biotechnology applications of tethered lipid bilayer membranes. Materials 2012 , 5 , 2637–2657. [CrossRef]
- Messner, P.; Schäffer, C.; Egelseer, E.M.; Sleytr, U.B. Occurrence, Structure, Chemistry, Genetics, Morphogenesis, and Function of S-Layers. In Prokaryotic Cell Wall Compounds—Structure and Biochemistry; König, H., Claus, H., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 53–109.
- Whitman, W.B.; Coleman, D.C.; Wiebe, W.J. Prokaryotes: The unseen majority. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998 , 95 , 6578–6583. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sleytr, U.B. Heterologous reattachment of regular arrays of glycoproteins on bacterial surfaces. Nature 1975 , 257 , 400–402. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sleytr, U.B.; Huber, C.; Ilk, N.; Pum, D.; Schuster, B.; Egelseer, E.M. S-Layers as a tool kit for nanobiotechnological applications. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007 , 267 , 131–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sleytr, U.B. Regular arrays of macromolecules on bacterial cell walls: Structure, chemistry, assembly, and function. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1978 , 53 , 1–64. [PubMed]
- Liew, P.W.Y.; Jong, B.C.; Najimudin, N. Hypothetical protein Avin_16040 as the S-layer protein of Azotobacter vinelandii and its involvement in plant root surface attachment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015 , 81 , 7484–7495. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sleytr, U.B.; Messner, P. Self-assembly of crystalline bacterial cell surface layers (S-layers). In Electron Microscopy of Subcellular Dynamics; Plattner, H., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1989; pp. 13–31.
- De Yoreo, J.J.; Chung, S.; Friddle, R.W. In situ atomic force microscopy as a tool for investigating interactions and assembly dynamics in biomolecular and biomineral systems. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013 , 23 , 2525–2538. [CrossRef]
- Sleytr, U.B. Curiosity and Passion for Science and Art; World Scientific: Singapore, 2016.
- Pavkov-Keller, T.; Howorka, S.; Keller, W. The structure of bacterial S-layer proteins. In Molecular Assembly in Natural and Engineered Systems; Howorka, S., Ed.; Elsevier Academic Press Inc.: Burlington, NJ, USA, 2011; Volume 103, pp. 73–130.
- Sleytr, U.B.; Beveridge, T.J. Bacterial S-layers. Trends Microbiol. 1999 , 7 , 253–260. [CrossRef]
- Picher, M.M.; Küpcü, S.; Huang, C.J.; Dostalek, J.; Pum, D.; Sleytr, U.B.; Ertl, P. Nanobiotechnology advanced antifouling surfaces for the continuous electrochemical monitoring of glucose in whole blood using a lab-on-a-chip. Lab Chip 2013 , 13 , 1780–1789. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sára, M.; Pum, D.; Sleytr, U.B. Permeability and charge-dependent adsorption properties of the S-layer lattice from Bacillus coagulans E38-66. J. Bacteriol. 1992 , 174 , 3487–3493. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sára, M.; Sleytr, U.B. S-Layer Proteins. J. Bacteriol. 2000 , 182 , 859–868. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sleytr, U.B.; Messner, P. Crystalline bacterial cell surface layers (S-layers). In Encyclopedia of Microbiology, 3rd ed.; Schaechter, M., Ed.; Academic Press/Elsevier Science: San Diego, CA, USA, 2009; Volume 1, pp. 89–98.
- Sleytr, U.B.; Messner, P.; Pum, D.; Sára, M. Crystalline bacterial cell surface layers (S-layers): From supramolecular cell structure to biomimetics and nanotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999 , 38 , 1034–1054. [CrossRef]
- Sleytr, U.B.; Sára, M.; Pum, D.; Schuster, B.; Messner, P.; Schäffer, C. Self-assembly protein systems: Microbial S-layers. In Biopolymers. Polyamides and Complex Proteinaceous Materials I; Steinbüchel, A., Fahnestock, S.R., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002; pp. 285–338.
- Fagan, R.P.; Fairweather, N.F. Biogenesis and functions of bacterial S-layers. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014 , 12 , 211–222. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sleytr, U.B.; Egelseer, E.M.; Pum, D.; Schuster, B. S-Layers. In NanoBiotechnology: Concepts, Methods and Perspectives; Niemeyer, C.M., Mirkin, C.A., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004; pp. 77–92.
- Pum, D.; Messner, P.; Sleytr, U.B. Role of the S layer in morphogenesis and cell division of the archaebacterium Methanocorpusculum sinense. J. Bacteriol. 1991 , 173 , 6865–6873. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Engelhardt, H.; Peters, J. Structural Research on Surface Layers: A Focus on Stability, Surface Layer Homology Domains, and Surface Layer–Cell Wall Interactions. J. Struct. Biol. 1998 , 124 , 276–302. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sotiropoulou, S.; Mark, S.S.; Angert, E.R.; Batt, C.A. Nanoporous S-layer protein lattices. A biological ion gate with calcium selectivity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007 , 111 , 13232–13237. [CrossRef]
- Sleytr, U.B.; Györvary, E.; Pum, D. Crystallization of S-layer protein lattices on surfaces and interfaces. Prog. Organ. Coat. 2003 , 47 , 279–287. [CrossRef]
- Pum, D.; Sára, M.; Sleytr, U.B. Structure, surface charge, and self-assembly of the S-layer lattice from Bacillus coagulans E38-66. J. Bacteriol. 1989 , 171 , 5296–5303. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pum, D.; Sleytr, U.B. Large-scale reconstruction of crystalline bacterial surface layer proteins at the air-water interface and on lipids. Thin Solid Films 1994 , 244 , 882–886. [CrossRef]
- Pum, D.; Weinhandl, M.; Hödl, C.; Sleytr, U.B. Large-scale recrystallization of the S-layer of Bacillus coagulans E38-66 at the air/water interface and on lipid films. J. Bacteriol. 1993 , 175 , 2762–2766. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Györvary, E.S.; Stein, O.; Pum, D.; Sleytr, U.B. Self-assembly and recrystallization of bacterial S-layer proteins at silicon supports imaged in real time by atomic force microscopy. J. Microsc. 2003 , 212 Pt 3, 300–306. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, J.; Ebner, A.; Ilk, N.; Lichtblau, H.; Huber, C.; Zhu, R.; Pum, D.; Leitner, M.; Pastushenko, V.; Gruber, H.J.; et al. High-affinity tags fused to S-layer proteins probed by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 2008 , 24 , 1324–1329. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, J.; Ebner, A.; Badelt-Lichtblau, H.; Völlenkle, C.; Rankl, C.; Kraxberger, B.; Leitner, M.; Wildling, L.; Gruber, H.J.; Sleytr, U.B.; et al. Recognition imaging and highly ordered molecular templating of bacterial S-layer nanoarrays containing affinity-tags. Nano Lett. 2008 , 8 , 4312–4319. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pum, D.; Sleytr, U.B. Anisotropic crystal growth of the S-layer of Bacillus sphaericus CCM 2177 at the air/water interface. Colloid Surf. A 1995 , 102 , 99–104. [CrossRef]
- Pum, D.; Sleytr, U.B. Monomolecular reassembly of a crystalline bacterial cell surface layer (S-layer) on untreated and modified silicon surfaces. Supramol. Sci. 1995 , 2 , 193–197. [CrossRef]
- Sleytr, U.B.; Sára, M.; Pum, D.; Schuster, B. Crystalline bacterial cell surface layers (S-layers): A versatile self-assembly system. In Supramolecular Polymers, 2nd ed.; Ciferri, A., Ed.; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; pp. 583–612.
- Rothbauer, M.; Küpcü, S.; Sticker, D.; Sleytr, U.B.; Ertl, P. Exploitation of S-layer anisotropy: PH-dependent nanolayer orientation for cellular micropatterning. ACS Nano 2013 , 7 , 8020–8030. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weygand, M.; Kjaer, K.; Howes, P.B.; Wetzer, B.; Pum, D.; Sleytr, U.B.; Lösche, M. Structural reorganization of phospholipid headgroups upon recrystallization of an S-layer lattice. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002 , 106 , 5793–5799. [CrossRef]
- Weygand, M.; Schalke, M.; Howes, P.B.; Kjaer, K.; Friedmann, J.; Wetzer, B.; Pum, D.; Sleytr, U.B.; Lösche, M. Coupling of protein sheet crystals (S-layers) to phospholipid monolayers. J. Mater. Chem. 2000 , 10 , 141–148. [CrossRef]
- Weygand, M.; Wetzer, B.; Pum, D.; Sleytr, U.B.; Cuvillier, N.; Kjaer, K.; Howes, P.B.; Lösche, M. Bacterial S-layer protein coupling to lipids: X-ray reflectivity and grazing incidence diffraction studies. Biophys. J. 1999 , 76 , 458–468. [CrossRef]
- Comolli, L.R. Conformational Transitions Driving Lattice Growth at an S-Layer Boundary Resolved by cryo-TEM. Biophys. J. 2013 , 104 , 353A–353A. [CrossRef]
- Comolli, L.R.; Siegerist, C.E.; Shin, S.H.; Bertozzi, C.; Regan, W.; Zettl, A.; De Yoreo, J. Conformational Transitions at an S-Layer Growing Boundary Resolved by Cryo-TEM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013 , 52 , 4829–4832. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sleytr, U.B.; Messner, P.; Pum, D.; Sára, M. Kristalline Zelloberflächen-Schichten prokaryotischer Organismen (S Schichten): Von der supramolekularen Zellstruktur zur Biomimetik und Nanotechnologie. Angew. Chem. 1999 , 111 , 1098–1120. [CrossRef]
- Schuster, B.; Sleytr, U.B. Nanotechnology with S-layer proteins. In Methods in Molecular Biology; Gerrard, J.A., Gerrard, J.A., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2013; Volume 996, pp. 153–175.
- Györvary, E.S.; O’Riordan, A.; Quinn, A.J.; Redmond, G.; Pum, D.; Sleytr, U.B. Biomimetic nanostructure fabrication: Nonlithographic lateral patterning and self-assembly of functional bacterial S-layers at silicon supports. Nano Lett. 2003 , 3 , 315–319. [CrossRef]
- Schuster, B.; Sleytr, U.B. The effect of hydrostatic pressure on S layer-supported lipid membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002 , 1563 , 29–34. [CrossRef]
- Schuster, B.; Sleytr, U.B. Biomimetic S-layer supported lipid membranes. Curr. Nanosci. 2006 , 2 , 143–152. [CrossRef]
- Ilk, N.; Egelseer, E.M.; Sleytr, U.B. S-layer fusion proteins-construction principles and applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011 , 22 , 824–831. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moll, D.; Huber, C.; Schlegel, B.; Pum, D.; Sleytr, U.B.; Sára, M. S-layer-streptavidin fusion proteins as template for nanopatterned molecular arrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002 , 99 , 14646–14651. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
