Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The Role of Dependency Theory in Analyzing Contemporary Capitalism (final paper), Summaries of International Relations

Dependency theory is a valuable framework for understanding the dynamics of contemporary capitalism.

Typology: Summaries

2021/2022

Uploaded on 05/09/2023

eda7eda
eda7eda 🇹🇷

6 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
- The Role of Dependency Theory in Analyzing Contemporary Capitalism -
Contemporary capitalism is a complex and dynamic economic system characterized by increasing levels
of globalization, rapid technological change, and growing income inequality. Scientists have developed
a range of theoretical frameworks and analytical tools to understand the workings of this system and
the various forces that shape it. One such framework is dependency theory, which emerged in the
1960s and 1970s as a critique of traditional development theories. One of the most influential to shed
light on this theory is Marxism, a social, political and economic theory developed by the German
philosopher and economist Karl Marx. At the same time, Andre Gunder is one of the most important
representatives of the addiction theory and shed light on many details. So what exactly is dependecy
theory?
Dependency theory emerged in the 1960s and 1970s as a critique of traditional development theories.
The theory suggests that the underdevelopment of "developing" countries is not a natural or inevitable
consequence of economic progress, but rather a result of their unequal relations with stronger
"developed" countries. The global economic system is characterized by a structural inequality that
subordinates and exploits the weakest, while maintaining the dominance of the strongest. This
structural inequality is sustained through a variety of mechanisms, including unequal trade relations,
foreign investment and debt. In addition, Wallerstein's world systems theory, which proposes that the
world economy is divided into core, periphery and semiperiphery regions, is an important component
of dependency theory. Core countries are the most developed and powerful, while peripheral countries
are the least developed and most exploited. Semi-peripheral countries are somewhere in between,
with some degree of both exploitation and power.
At its core, dependency theory claims that developed countries use their economic, political and
military power to extract resources and wealth from developing countries, leaving them in a state of
dependency and underdevelopment. This relationship is maintained through international institutions
and policies that support developed countries and the imposition of neoliberal economic policies that
put the interests of multinational corporations before the interests of local communities. One of the
key insights of dependency theory is that the global economy is not a level playing field, but rather an
unequal distribution of power and resources. This unequal distribution of power is a product of
historical and ongoing relations between countries, in which developed countries can use their power
to shape the rules of the global economic system in their favor.
While dependency theory has been subject to critique and debate over the years, it continues to offer
valuable insights into the functioning of contemporary capitalism and the distribution of power within
the global economy. By highlighting the ways in which developed countries have benefited from the
underdevelopment of developing countries, dependency theory provides a lens through which to
understand some of the most pressing challenges facing international relations today. For example, the
theory sheds light on the ongoing struggles over resources and power, as developing countries seek to
assert greater control over their own economic development and challenge the dominance of
developed countries. It also underscores the importance of examining the historical and ongoing
relationships between countries in order to understand contemporary global economic patterns and
inequalities. Overall, the application of dependency theory to international relations offers a rich and
nuanced framework for understanding the complex dynamics of power and resources that shape the
global economy. By engaging with this theory and its insights, scholars and policymakers can develop
more sophisticated and equitable approaches to addressing the challenges of contemporary capitalism.
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download The Role of Dependency Theory in Analyzing Contemporary Capitalism (final paper) and more Summaries International Relations in PDF only on Docsity!

  • The Role of Dependency Theory in Analyzing Contemporary Capitalism - Contemporary capitalism is a complex and dynamic economic system characterized by increasing levels of globalization, rapid technological change, and growing income inequality. Scientists have developed a range of theoretical frameworks and analytical tools to understand the workings of this system and the various forces that shape it. One such framework is dependency theory, which emerged in the 1960s and 1970s as a critique of traditional development theories. One of the most influential to shed light on this theory is Marxism, a social, political and economic theory developed by the German philosopher and economist Karl Marx. At the same time, Andre Gunder is one of the most important representatives of the addiction theory and shed light on many details. So what exactly is dependecy theory? Dependency theory emerged in the 1960s and 1970s as a critique of traditional development theories. The theory suggests that the underdevelopment of "developing" countries is not a natural or inevitable consequence of economic progress, but rather a result of their unequal relations with stronger "developed" countries. The global economic system is characterized by a structural inequality that subordinates and exploits the weakest, while maintaining the dominance of the strongest. This structural inequality is sustained through a variety of mechanisms, including unequal trade relations, foreign investment and debt. In addition, Wallerstein's world systems theory, which proposes that the world economy is divided into core, periphery and semiperiphery regions, is an important component of dependency theory. Core countries are the most developed and powerful, while peripheral countries are the least developed and most exploited. Semi-peripheral countries are somewhere in between, with some degree of both exploitation and power. At its core, dependency theory claims that developed countries use their economic, political and military power to extract resources and wealth from developing countries, leaving them in a state of dependency and underdevelopment. This relationship is maintained through international institutions and policies that support developed countries and the imposition of neoliberal economic policies that put the interests of multinational corporations before the interests of local communities. One of the key insights of dependency theory is that the global economy is not a level playing field, but rather an unequal distribution of power and resources. This unequal distribution of power is a product of historical and ongoing relations between countries, in which developed countries can use their power to shape the rules of the global economic system in their favor. While dependency theory has been subject to critique and debate over the years, it continues to offer valuable insights into the functioning of contemporary capitalism and the distribution of power within the global economy. By highlighting the ways in which developed countries have benefited from the underdevelopment of developing countries, dependency theory provides a lens through which to understand some of the most pressing challenges facing international relations today. For example, the theory sheds light on the ongoing struggles over resources and power, as developing countries seek to assert greater control over their own economic development and challenge the dominance of developed countries. It also underscores the importance of examining the historical and ongoing relationships between countries in order to understand contemporary global economic patterns and inequalities. Overall, the application of dependency theory to international relations offers a rich and nuanced framework for understanding the complex dynamics of power and resources that shape the global economy. By engaging with this theory and its insights, scholars and policymakers can develop more sophisticated and equitable approaches to addressing the challenges of contemporary capitalism.

In addition to these explanations, the dependency theory, which argues that the underdevelopment of developing countries is the result of their unequal relations with stronger developed countries, has been extensively applied to analyze the economic relationship between Latin America and the USA. According to dependency theorists, Latin America's economic underdevelopment can be attributed to the region's long-standing domination by the United States; The relationship between the United States and Latin America dates back to the early 19th century, when the United States became a rising power. The United States began to see Latin America as a natural sphere of influence and gradually expanded its economic and political dominance in the region. This domination took many forms, including military intervention, economic exploitation, and political intervention. Dependency theorists argue that this dominance led to the formation of a dependent relationship between the United States and Latin America. In this relationship, Latin America has to rely on the United States for investment, technology, and access to international markets, while the United States dominates and controls Latin America's natural resources and markets. This has resulted in the exploitation of Latin America, with many of its resources and labor being exported to the United States at low prices. To complete the above information on the other hand, from a Marxist point of view, dependency theory can be seen as an extension of Marx's analysis of the relationship between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat to the global level. Just as the bourgeoisie exploits the proletariat to extract surplus value and maintain its power, the developed countries exploit the developing countries for resources, labor and profit. The relationship between developed and developing countries, then, has drawn attention to the understandable perception of the bourgeoisie of developed countries as a form of class struggle in which it tries to maintain its dominance over the proletariat of the developing countries. In order to prevent class struggle and colonialism, Escobar's Encountering Development is a seminal work that criticizes the development paradigm imposed on developing countries by developed countries and international organizations such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. The development paradigm assumes that economic growth is the solution to all problems and leads to the exploitation and marginalization of many developing countries. In this case, Dependency theory also guides by presenting an alternative perspective that challenges the development paradigm by emphasizing the ways in which developed countries have historically exploited developing countries. Besides, we can feel the effects of dependency theory on contemporary capitalism especially in David Harvey's writings. David Harvey's book Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism conveys Harvey's thoughts by providing a comprehensive analysis of contemporary capitalism and its inner contradictions. Harvey argues that capitalism is fundamentally unstable and prone to crises, and these crises are exacerbated by the unequal distribution of power and resources. He also criticizes the concept of the "free market", arguing that markets are always shaped by power relations and political interventions. It creates information by explaining the context of their return to the theory of addiction. On the one hand, Giovanni Arrighi offers a historical analysis of the rise of capitalism and its impact on the world economy. Arrighi argues that capitalism is a cyclical system characterized by alternating periods of growth and decline. It also highlights that the rise of capitalism in Europe is dependent on the exploitation of other regions, particularly Asia. Taken together, these resources provide a rich and nuanced perspective on the role of dependency theory in analyzing contemporary capitalism. They highlight how the global economic system is structured around the concentration of power and resources in developed countries, and how this concentration perpetuates the backwardness of developing countries. They also offer insights into the inherent contradictions of capitalism and the cyclical nature of the system.