

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The investigation of the uppermost devonian to carboniferous sedimentary strata in the eagle plain basin of northern yukon. The authors identify a second-order transgressive-regressive cycle, characterized by uppermost devonian sandy incised channel-fills and lower carboniferous shaly deposits. They also discuss the exploration significance of the erosion unconformity and its relationship to local faults and hydrocarbon migration. Detailed seismic studies have documented this regionally extensive erosion unconformity and its impact on the regional paleo-tectonic regimes and new source areas.
What you will learn
Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Gillian Q. Chi* University of Calgary, Calgary (Open Students), 2500 University Drive N.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N qchi@ucalgary.ca Larry Lane Geological Survey of Canada, Calgary
Summary Investigation of the Uppermost Devonian to Carboniferous sedimentary strata in the Eagle Plain basin of Northern Yukon shows that this highly cyclic rock succession is composed of a second-order transgressive
Based on two different seismic expressions, the Tuttle Formation in Eagle Plain basin can be identified as Upper Tuttle Formation and Lower Tuttle Formation. The Upper Tuttle Formation is composed of sandy incised channel-fills in the base of this transgressive – regressive cycle with a makeable of regional unconformity; and the Lower Tuttle Formation consists of wedge-shaped turbidite deposits between this erosion surface and the underlying Upper Devonian Imperial Formation. Detailed regional seismic stratigraphic studies have documented this regionally extensive erosion unconformity truncated with Sub- Mesozoic unconformity in the northern edge of the Lower Tuttle Formation in the middle part of the basin and extended to south, a distance of 120 km around. An origin by the tectonics in the north or northeast may contributed to this remarkable erosion unconformity and tectonic uplift in the study area during the Uppermost Devonian and Early Carboniferous changed paleo-tectonic regimes and new sourcelands generated in the north, which resulted in the clastic wedges of the northeastern progradation of the Middle and Upper Devonian Imperial Formation and Lower Tuttle Formation overlaid by the north-sourced depositions. It was possible assumed that tectonically uplifting in this period may caused the north- northwest trending Richard Trough to raise up to the surface and sequent folded as the Richardson Mountain anticlinorium.
The exploration significance of this erosion unconformity is as follows:
The northeastern prograding turbidite clastic wedges between the Middle and Upper Devonian Imperial Formation and Lower Tuttle Formation were regionally truncated by this erosion unconformity. Hydrocarbon from these turbidite deposits have been discovered in the eastern Peer Plain and Plateau areas. The stratigraphic contact patterns of this erosion surface with the underlying turbidite deposits controls on the hydrocarbon systems in turbidite play.
Channels in the Upper Tuttle Formation deeply cut into this unconformity with sandy-fills, and followed by the covering of the maximum thick up to 679 m shaly transgressive deposits. The resulting geometry may keep many types of channel sand bodies in the large areas from the middle to southern basin with a good potential for stratigraphic trapping although the prediction of the sand bodies is difficult.
Acknowledgements This study is the result of collaboration between the co-authors that conducted in Geological Survey of Canada as part of the Geo-Mapping for Energy and Minerals (GEM) Program from February to July 2010. We would like to thank John Harper, Director of Geological Survey of Canada (Calgary), for his insights