Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Public Economics about edge worth box, Exercises of Introduction to Public Administration

Public Economics. this box illustrates Edge-worth box clearly

Typology: Exercises

2015/2016

Uploaded on 12/12/2016

feysal1991
feysal1991 🇹🇷

1 document

1 / 11

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
General vs. Partial Equilibrium The Edgeworth Box The Contract Curve The Core
General Equilibrium (without Production)
or
Exchange
(Chapter 31)
General vs. Partial Equilibrium The Edgeworth Box The Contract Curve The Core
General Equilibrium
Events in one market have eects on other markets (spillovers)
Demand for xdepends upon prices of complements,
substitutes; income
Supply of xdepends upon factor prices
Previously, we’ve taken these as given– doing partial
equilibrium analysis
But its important to understand interdependence of markets–
general equilibrium analysis
Partial equilibrium analysis says that competitive markets yield
efficient outcomes—is this still true in general equilibrium?
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Public Economics about edge worth box and more Exercises Introduction to Public Administration in PDF only on Docsity!

General Equilibrium (without Production)

or

Exchange

(Chapter 31)

General vs. Partial Equilibrium The Edgeworth Box The Contract Curve The Core

General Equilibrium

  • Events in one market have e↵ects on other markets (spillovers)
  • (^) Demand for x depends upon prices of complements, substitutes; income
  • Supply of x depends upon factor prices
  • (^) Previously, we’ve taken these as given– doing partial equilibrium analysis
  • But its important to understand interdependence of markets– general equilibrium analysis Partial equilibrium analysis says that competitive markets yield ecient outcomes—is this still true in general equilibrium?

General Equilibrium

Our approach:

  • (^) Simple environment—the entire economy
    • 2 kinds of goods
    • (^) 2 people
  • Focus on exchange
    • Abstract away from production of new goods
    • (^) Give people endowments
    • Specify preferences
    • (^) Allow them to trade
  • Make predictions about behavior of utility-maximizers
  • (^) Evaluate welfare General vs. Partial Equilibrium The Edgeworth Box The Contract Curve The Core

Endowment Economy

  • (^) Consumers A and B; goods 1 and 2
  • Endowments: !A^ = (! 1 A ,! 2 A ) and !B^ = (!B 1 , !B 2 )
  • (^) Example: !A^ = (6, 4) and !B^ = (2, 2)
  • (^) This means total endowment of good 1 is !A 1 + !B 1 = 6 + 2 = 8 and of good 2 is! 2 A + !B 2 = 4 + 2 = 6

Edgeworth Box

Edgeworth Box Feasible Reallocations

OA

OB

Z (^) 1 Z 1

A B

x

A

Z

Z

A
B



x

A

x

B

x

B

General vs. Partial Equilibrium The Edgeworth Box The Contract Curve The Core

How do we think about equilibrium?

  • In partial equilibrium analysis:
    • Treat each good separately
    • (^) Find p and q that equate supply and demand
  • (^) But this is general equilibrium analysis: where do supply and demand come from?
  • (^) A and B can trade with each other
  • (^) For everything to be balanced, the amount that A gives up has to equal amount that B receives (for each good, and vice versa)
  • (^) In other words Supply = Demand for each good
  • This will determine prices for each good
  • (^) How do we find supply and demand curves?
  • (^) Go back to utility maximization problem
  • (^) Need to specify preferences to do this

Utility maximization

  • Preferences are given
  • Given prices for each good, endowment bundle serves as income
  • (^) Can write down budget constraint p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2  p 1! 1 + p 2! 2
  • (^) Solve utility maximization problem
  • (^) Gives you optimal allocation, as a function of price ratio
  • x 1 ⇤ ! 1 > 0 means person demands more of good 1
  • (^) x 1 ⇤ ! 1 < 0 means person is willing to supply good 1
  • (^) Key question: what prices will make it so that A demand exactly as much of each good as B supplies? General vs. Partial Equilibrium The Edgeworth Box The Contract Curve The Core

Consumer A’s Preferences

Preferences of A

Adding Preferences to the Box

Z 2

A

Z 1

A

x

A

x

A

M

o

re

p

re

fe

rr

e

d

For consumer A.

OA

Putting Them Both Together

Putting both of them together Edgeworth’s Box Z (^) 2

A

Z 1

A

x

A

x

A

OA

Z (^) 2

B

Z 1

B

x

B

x

B

OB

General vs. Partial Equilibrium The Edgeworth Box The Contract Curve The Core

Pareto-improving allocations

  • (^) Given a particular allocation, a Pareto-improving allocation improves the welfare of at least one consumer without reducing the welfare of another.
  • How do we depict Pareto-improving allocations in the Edgeworth box?

Pareto-Improving Allocations

Putting both of them together Edgeworth’s Box Z (^) 2

A

Z 1

A

x

A

x

A

OA

Z (^) 2

B

Z 1

B

x

B

x

B

OB

General vs. Partial Equilibrium The Edgeworth Box The Contract Curve The Core

Pareto-Improving Allocations

Pareto-improving allocations Pareto-Improvements Z (^) 2

A

Z 1

A

x

A

x

A

OA

Z (^) 2

B

Z 1

B

x

B

x

B

OB

The set of Pareto-

improving allocations

The Set of Pareto-Optimal Allocations

Pareto-Optimal Allocations Pareto-Optimality Z (^) 2

A

Z 1

A

x

A

x

A

OA

Z (^) 2

B

Z 1

B

x

B

x

B

OB

All the allocations marked by

a are Pareto-optimal.

The contract curve

General vs. Partial Equilibrium The Edgeworth Box The Contract Curve The Core

Pareto-optimal Allocations

  • From the figures, we can see that an allocation at which the indi↵erence curves of the two consumers are tangent must be Pareto-optimal
  • Tangency implies they have the same slope
  • (^) What is the slope of an indi↵erence curve? The Marginal rate of substitution (MRS)!
  • Condition for Pareto-optimality: MRS A = @uA(x 1 A ,x 2 A ) @x 1 A @uA(x 1 A ,x 2 A ) @x 2 A

@uB^ (x 1 B ,x 2 B ) @x 1 B @uB^ (x 1 B ,x 2 B ) @x 2 B

= MRS

B

  • (^) We also require feasibility: x A 1 +^ x B 1 =^! A 1 +^! B 1 and^ x A 2 +^ x B 2 =^! A 2 +^! B 2

Example

Identifying Pareto-optimal allocations

  • (^) Recall total endoments:! 1 A +! 1 B = 6 + 2 = 8 and !A 2 + !B 2 = 4 + 2 = 6
  • (^) Let uA(x 1 A , x 2 A ) = ln(x 1 A ) + 2 ln(x 2 A ) and u B (x B 1 ,^ x B 2 ) = ln(x B 1 ) + 2 ln(x B 2 ).
  • (^) MRS of consumer A: MRS A = 1 x 1 A 2 x 2 A

x 2 A 2 x A 1

  • (^) Similarly, MRS B = 1 x 1 B 2 x 2 B

x 2 B 2 x 1 B

  • So a Pareto-optimum is a feasible allocation for which x A 2 2 x 1 A

x B 2 2 x 1 B General vs. Partial Equilibrium The Edgeworth Box The Contract Curve The Core

Example

Finding all Pareto-optimal allocations (deriving the contract curve)

  • We can simplify tangency condition to: x A 2 x 1 A

x B 2 x 1 B

  • (^) Recall endowment/feasibility requirement: x A 1 +^ x B 1 = 8^ and^ x A 2 +^ x B 2 = 6
  • Re-write tangency condition, substituting x 1 B = 8 x 1 A and x B 2 = 6^ ^ x A 2 : x 2 A x 1 A

6 x 2 A 8 x 1 A or x A 2 =^

x A 1

  • (^) This is the equation of the contract curve.
  • (^) In this case, it’s just the diagonal of the rectangle