













Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A lab report for a physics course, specifically focusing on the simple pendulum. The report includes the procedure, data, analysis, and conclusions of an experiment conducted to investigate the oscillation period of a simple pendulum independent of oscillation amplitude, oscillating mass, and pendulum length. The report includes graphs and tables to visualize the data and results.
Typology: Cheat Sheet
1 / 21
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
- PHYS - Lab
Introduction:
In this lab we will be looking at the simple pendulum, specifically the oscillation period
independent of the oscillation amplitude, oscillation period independent of the oscillating mass.
These oscillations are given by the equation, 𝑇 = 2 𝜋%
!
"
. This equation is how we determine the
oscillation period of a simple pendulum under these conditions. We can also use the parameters
of the experiment to determine this as well.
Procedure:
The procedure set up required a textbook/ weight, tooth floss, binder clip, protractor,
multiple of the same type of coin and a timing device. To set up the experiment I attached the
tooth floss to the binder clip and inserted coins into the binder clip. I then inserted the tooth floss
into the pages of a textbook to hold the binder clip over the edge of a desk. With this set up I
would take the binder clip and move it to the side, with tension on the tooth floss, to a certain
angle using the protractor then would release it and start timing after the first oscillation. For the
first part of the experiment the same number of coins (weight) were used at different oscillation
angles each time, the second part was changing the amount of coins but keeping the same
oscillation angle, and the third part was changing the pendulum length while keeping the amount
of coins and oscillation angle the same. The setup is shown in Fig 1, Fig 2 and Fig 3.
Fig 3. Set up of the experiment, using the protractor.
Data:
Oscillation Angle
q (°)
Time for 10 Oscillations
t (sec)
Period
T ± (s)
Pendulum length L = (0.059 ± 0.001) m
Pendulum mass m = (0.018 ± 0.004) kg
Fig 4. Data of the period vs. oscillation amplitude trial.
Pendulum mass
(kg)
Time for 10 Oscillations
t (sec)
Period
T ± (s)
8.80e- 3 15.4 2 1.5 4 ± 0.0 2
1.32e- 2 15. 1.5 3 ± 0.0 2
1.76e- 2 15. 1.5 5 ± 0.0 2
2.20e- 2 15. 1.5 6 ± 0.0 2
2.64e- 2 15. 1.5 7 ± 0.0 4
3.08e- 2 15. 1.5 8 ± 0.0 4
Pendulum length L = (0.059 ± 0.01) m
Oscillation angle q = 45°
Fig 6. Data table representing the period vs. pendulum mass.
Pendulum length
(m)
Time for 10 Oscillations
t (sec)
Period
T ± (s)
4.9e- 1 13.
5.1e- 1 14.
5.3e- 1 15. 08
5.5e- 1 1 4.
5.7e- 1 15. 30
5.9e- 1 15. 78
6.1e- 1 15. 1.59 ± 0.
6.3e- 1 15. 1.58 ± 0.
6.5e- 1 16. 1.63 ± 0.
6.7e- 1 16. 1.66 ± 0.
Pendulum mass m = (0.018± 0.004) kg
Oscillation angle q = 45°
Fig 7. Data table representing the pendulum length vs. period.
Fig 9. Graph of pendulum length vs. period with a curved fit graphical representation.
Analysis / Discussion:
For the analysis of Statement 1: The oscillation period of a simple pendulum is
independent of the oscillation amplitude is proven and is not violated. As seen in both Fig 4 and
Fig 5 the periods range from 1.51 s-1.54 s, excluding the first and last points. Therefore, we can
argue that the data from the trial ( Fig 4 and Fig 5 ) do not violate statement one for the oscillation
angles of 5°- 25 °, and the proposed theory has survived the test.
Statement 2: The oscillation period of a simple pendulum is independent of the oscillating
mass, is proven and not violated. Although the period seems to increase as weight is added, the
increase excluding the first and last data points is from 1.53 s – 1.57 s, which ultimately comes
down to human error as that fraction of time is so small. This is represented in Fig 6, showing
that statement 2 is not violated for the masses of 8.80g - 30.8g, and the proposed theory has
survived the test. All quarters used were from 2000 – present. See Sample Calculations for the
calculation of weights.
Statement 3: The oscillation period of the simple pendulum is given by the equation:
!
"
. This statement is not violated as the oscillation period increases with the length of
the pendulum. This is seen in the data table Fig 7. This can also be seen through the equation
given:
If we use the length of 5.3e-2 and 6.1e-2 from Fig 7 we can plug them into the equation and
further prove the statements validity,
#$
%
And,
#$
%
This shows that theoretically the period should increase as the length of the pendulum increases
and it is seen in the experiment as well, further proving the validity of the statement. In this case
the linear fit represents the data better as it is easier to dissect as well as the slope is directly
Questions:
To find the period T:
Then plug T in to find L:
%
The length of the pendulum in that video is 0.52m or 52cm.
use the gravitational force od the moon in the equation above:
%
The period of oscillation on the moon is 3.56 seconds.
Sample Calculations:
Determining period from the time of 10 oscillations (data point 1 from Fig 4 ):
The period is 1.58 ± 0.04 s.
Calculating the weight of the coins from Fig 6 data point 1:
&'()
'+,
'+,
'+,
Determining period in statement 3 (data point 3 in Fig 7 ):
#%
%
#%
%