


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The topics that are enclosed in the reviewer are the following: - FREEDOM OF THE HUMAN PERSON - Circumstantial Freedom - Metaphysical Freedom - THE SELF AND THE OTHER - Intersubjectivity - THE HUMAN PERSON AND THE SOCIETY - DEATH
What you will learn
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Freedom – requires a degree of control from the person who exercises it If there is a need to control, then are we really free? “I can do whatever I want. This is a free country.”
Circumstantial Freedom – “I am free, if and only if, my circumstance allows me to be free.” Metaphysical Freedom – “I have the power to decide what will happen to me in the future.” Originating cause of a decision Leads us to free actions????? In which we can be held responsible Fatalism – philosophical doctrine emphasizing the subjugation of all events/actions to fate/destiny Libertarianism – view that defines a free act as one that is exclusively controlled by the person’s will as long as he/she respects the equal rights of others Determinism – our actions are controlled by factors such as biology, genes, the way we are brought up by our families and society Determinists believe that we are passive to our existence and we have no free will Does not give room for choices, everything is predetermined Can you blame me kung nakatadhana? Hard-Determinism – all things are determined by purely external factors of which we have no control
Freedom vs. Determinism Are we really free? John Locke: you do not know that the room is locked from the outside, then are you really not to go outside? He thinks he is free pero illusion lang? his illusion to leave is not really a choice or an option When we try to reconcile freedom and determinism, we encounter the idea of God and how God affects our freedom If everything is predetermined, is there someone who determines? Divine Foreknowledge – “God knows about every little thing about you.” God is all-knowing God knows all your desires God knows why and the effect of your choice Knows every little thing about you Divine Providence – nothing happens outside of the Divine Will God provides????? God orders and controls all that occurs If God can see into the future, can see someone’s action before they have been done, then are we really free? Does God’s omniscience eliminate free will? How do we reconcile divine foreknowledge, determinism, and the human freedom? Pwede bang naniniwala ako sa Diyos pero naniniwala akong malaya ako? If you believe in God, then do you have the power to be free????? He just knows about our choices We can still choose????? Binigyan niya tayo ng choice Absolute Freedom and Responsibility
Intersubjectivity – the interaction between the self and the other The shared awareness and understanding among persons The ability of humans to agree and cooperate The existence of shared or common knowledge and consensus, as well as emotions like grief, joy, and love We are aware that there are persons unique from us Self-consciousness: characteristic that sets apart an interaction between people????? There are people who act intentionally to deceive others “No man is an island.” “Walang sino man ang nabubuhay para sa sarili lamang.” The self always exists with the other We have an undeniable connection????? With others When both truly acknowledge each other’s presence A much deeper level of interaction through dialogue We fall into a dialogue Much deeper connection through dialogue A dialogue is made possible when we realize that the other is a genuine and unique individual and we take interest in that When two individuals begin to view each other as selves when both truly acknowledge each other’s presence, that’s the beginning of authentic relationship and dialogue Martin Buber’s I and Thou (Two Kinds of Relationships) (I is the self or the subject and Thou is you or the other)
Philosophers Edmund Husserl – … where people are able to put themselves into someone else’s shoes and thereby assume what the other person thinks and feels Karol Wojtyla – … one has to treat the other person not as a faceless entity, but as a person
Death – medical and biological perspective: the end of a biological organism Medical: brain dead Aging, disease, fatal injury (causes of death) Death is not merely confined to a physical death Social sciences: consider it as an experience which involves other people in the society (affect the society) Are we afraid of death or are we afraid of the things associated with death? Cultures: have varied ideas, values regarding death and these are reflected in our traditions, in funerary practices Inevitable phenomenon Philosophers: people often treat it with dread Death in the Philippine Context – religious observances, death anniversaries????? Para ma-feel ng deceased person that he or she is remembered Religiously influenced Religious Definition of Death – immortal soul Transition/cycle Faith Heaven, hell, purgatory Afterlife Core of the human person There is something in us which is immortal: soul spirit life Not every religion subscribe in the belief of the soul and its immortality Usually defined as a transition or cycle The soul will be placed directly to a place that is proportionate to its status in the earthly life Others believe that after death, the soul undergoes reincarnation: rebirth of the soul: a bad moral standing, leads to a lower form of birth and vice versa
All of these operates in the realm of faith
Existentialist Definition – to be or not to be Possibilities Dealing with anxiety Face it or run away from it? Anxiety from defining who we really are Be redirected to being Run away from the present Our existence is always a question of to be or not to be in the future Either you are a being or a non-being Determination of all the possibilities we have as humans will simply cease to exist These possibilities may pertain to the simplest of things The afterlife is not a concern for existentialist because the existence of the afterlife is not concrete and is based on faith We cannot validate the existence of heaven and hell????? Anxiety comes from our non-existence or non-
being????? Na baka hindi tayo umiral????? Death is a possibility as well, walang pinagkaiba sa ibang posibilidad The real source of anxiety that we get from death does not come from dying, but other things The fear concerning the manner on how we die The fear of leaving responsibilities Facing the possibility of our death, non-existence should redirect us to being If we accept death as a possibility, we should inevitably be led back to what is actual, concrete, present Kung takot ka sa kamatayan, it should boost you to live a more perfect life, a moral life Address the anxiety that concerns the human person in the light of death We only face anxiety in two levels: (1) we become anxious over the idea of our non-existence (kabaligtaran sa religious definition) and (2) anxiety may come from the realization that we are free to define who we are (given the responsibility to define who we are–to bear this responsibility because of freedom) How do we now face these anxieties given to us by the concept of death? Either we face it or we run away from it (most existentialists agree that people????? hide or run away from it) (makes us prone to living unauthentic life) Death is a part of our life How do you make sense of people running away from something that is part of them? Madaling tanggapin yung pananaw ng mga existentialist kung ang pinag-uusapan pa natin yung kalayaan