Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

People vs Concepcion, Assignments of Law

This is a case digest of People vs Concepcion which deals with topics on credit transactions.

Typology: Assignments

2022/2023

Uploaded on 03/11/2024

jik-koy
jik-koy 🇵🇭

1 document

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1. People vs. Concepcion – 44 Phil 126 (1922)
Facts
Venancio Concepcion, President of the PNB, authorized an extension of credit in favor of "Puno
y Concepcion, S. en C." in the amount of P300,000, a partnership wherein his wife owns one-
half of the capital.
As President of the PNB and as member of the board of directors of this bank, he was charged
in the Court of First Instance of Cagayan with a violation of section 35 of Act No. 2747. He was
found guilty and was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months.
Basis for conviction is Section 35 of Act No. 2747: "The National Bank shall not, directly or
indirectly, grant loans to any of the members of the board of directors of the bank nor to agents
of the branch banks." Section 49 of the same Act provides: "Any person who shall violate any of
the provisions of this Act shall be punished by a fine not to exceed ten thousand pesos, or by
imprisonment not to exceed five years, or by both such fine and imprisonment." These two
sections were in effect in 1919 when the alleged unlawful acts took place, but were repealed by
Act No. 2938, approved on January 30, 1921.
Issue/Ruling
I. Was the granting of a credit of P300,000 to the copartnership "Puno y Concepcion,
S. en C." by Venancio Concepcion, President of the Philippine National Bank, a
"loan" within the meaning of section 35 of Act No. 2747?
Argument: Counsel argue that the documents of record do not prove that authority to make a
loan was given, but only show the concession of a credit.
Ruling: In this statement of fact, counsel is correct, for the exhibits in question speak of a
"credito" (credit) and not of a " prestamo" (loan).The " credit" of an individual means his ability to
borrow money by virtue of the confidence or trust reposed by a lender that he will pay what he
may promise. (Donnell vs. Jones [1848], 13 Ala., 490; Bouvier's Law Dictionary.) A "loan"
means the delivery by one party and the receipt by the other party of a given sum of money,
upon an agreement, express or implied, to repay the sum loaned, with or without interest.
(Payne vs. Gardiner [1864], 29 N. Y., 146, 167.) The concession of a "credit" necessarily
involves the granting of "loans" up to the limit of the amount fixed in the "credit,"
II. Was the granting of a credit of P300,000 to the copartnership "Puno y Concepcion,
S. en C.," by Venancio Concepcion, President of the Philippine National Bank, a
"loan" or a "discount"?
Argument: Counsel argue that while section 35 of Act No. 2747 prohibits the granting of a
"loan," it does not prohibit what is commonly known as a "discount."
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download People vs Concepcion and more Assignments Law in PDF only on Docsity!

1. People vs. Concepcion – 44 Phil 126 (1922) Facts Venancio Concepcion, President of the PNB, authorized an extension of credit in favor of "Puno y Concepcion, S. en C." in the amount of P300,000, a partnership wherein his wife owns one- half of the capital. As President of the PNB and as member of the board of directors of this bank, he was charged in the Court of First Instance of Cagayan with a violation of section 35 of Act No. 2747. He was found guilty and was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months. Basis for conviction is Section 35 of Act No. 2747: "The National Bank shall not, directly or indirectly, grant loans to any of the members of the board of directors of the bank nor to agents of the branch banks." Section 49 of the same Act provides: "Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this Act shall be punished by a fine not to exceed ten thousand pesos, or by imprisonment not to exceed five years, or by both such fine and imprisonment." These two sections were in effect in 1919 when the alleged unlawful acts took place, but were repealed by Act No. 2938, approved on January 30, 1921. Issue/Ruling I. Was the granting of a credit of P300,000 to the copartnership "Puno y Concepcion, S. en C." by Venancio Concepcion, President of the Philippine National Bank, a "loan" within the meaning of section 35 of Act No. 2747? Argument: Counsel argue that the documents of record do not prove that authority to make a loan was given, but only show the concession of a credit. Ruling: In this statement of fact, counsel is correct, for the exhibits in question speak of a "credito" (credit) and not of a " prestamo" (loan).The " credit " of an individual means his ability to borrow money by virtue of the confidence or trust reposed by a lender that he will pay what he may promise. (Donnell vs. Jones [1848], 13 Ala., 490; Bouvier's Law Dictionary.) A " loan " means the delivery by one party and the receipt by the other party of a given sum of money, upon an agreement, express or implied, to repay the sum loaned, with or without interest. (Payne vs. Gardiner [1864], 29 N. Y., 146, 167.) The concession of a "credit" necessarily involves the granting of "loans" up to the limit of the amount fixed in the "credit," II. Was the granting of a credit of P300,000 to the copartnership "Puno y Concepcion, S. en C.," by Venancio Concepcion, President of the Philippine National Bank, a "loan" or a "discount"? Argument: Counsel argue that while section 35 of Act No. 2747 prohibits the granting of a "loan," it does not prohibit what is commonly known as a "discount."

Ruling: They were loans, not discounts. Discounts are favored by bankers because of their liquid nature, growing, as they do, out of an actual, live, transaction. But in its last analysis, to discount a paper is only a mode of loaning money, with, however, these distinctions: (1) In a discount, interest is deducted in advance, while in a loan, interest is taken at the expiration of a credit; (2) a discount is always on double-name paper; a loan is generally on single-name paper. Conceding, without deciding, that, as ruled by the Insular Auditor, the law covers loans and not discounts, yet the conclusion is inevitable that the demand notes signed by the firm "Puno y Concepcion, S. en C." were not discount paper but were mere evidences of indebtedness, because (1) interest was not deducted from the face of the notes, but was paid when the notes fell due; and (2) they were single-name and not double-name paper. III. Was the granting of a credit of P300,000 to the copartnership, "Puno y Concepcion, S. en C." by Venancio Concepcion, President of the Philippine National Bank, an "indirect loan" within the meaning of section 35 of Act No. 2747? Argument: Counsel argue that a loan to the partnership "Puno y Concepcion, S. en C." was not an "indirect loan." In this connection, it should be recalled that the wife of the defendant held one-half of the capital of this partnership. Ruling: It was an indirect loan. Various provisions of the Civil serve to establish the familiar relationship called a conjugal partnership. (Articles 1315, 1393, 1401, 1407, 1408, and 1412 can be specially noted.) A loan, therefore, to a partnership of which the wife of a director of a bank is a member, is an indirect loan to such director. That it was the intention of the Legislature to prohibit exactly such an occurrence is shown by the acknowledged fact that in this instance the defendant was tempted to mingle his personal and family affairs with his official duties, and to permit the loan P300,000 to a partnership of no established reputation and without asking for collateral security. Notes: Credit of an individual: his ability to borrow money by virtue of the confidence or trust reposed by a lender that he will pay what he may promise. Loan: delivery by one party and the receipt by the other party of a given sum of money, upon an agreement, express or implied, to repay the sum of money, upon an agreement, express or implied, to repay the sum loaned, with or without interest. Discount: Interest is deducted in advance; always on double-name paper. Loan: Interest is taken at the expiration of a credit; generally on single-name paper.