




Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A detailed explanation of the different modes of extinguishing obligations in philippine law, focusing on payment or performance, loss of the thing due, condonation or remission of debt, confusion or merger of rights, compensation, and novation. It also explores the concept of substantial performance in good faith and the role of third-party payments. The document uses examples and illustrations to clarify the legal concepts and principles.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 8
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Article 1231: EXPLAINES DIFFERENT MODES OF EXTINGUISHMENTS
Example: Si Pogi kay bound to pay Ganda 100 pesos tapos ang gihatag ni Pogi is 50 ra. Pede morefuse si Ganda sa kwarta na gihatag ni Pogi kay ang fulfillment wa man nahuman kay integrity of the prestation man siya, in which kinahanglan fully paid jud. Although naa ni siyay exemptions. b. Identity of the prestation kung unsa inyong gi isturyahan na prestation or obligation mao jud dapat to ang ihatag or buhaton (if performance). Example: The obligation is to give a car, dili ma extinguish ang obligation if balay imong ihatag. Burden (Dapat) of proving payment or ang dapat mo show og proof of payment. At first si creditor nay burden of showing na nay valid obligation na nag exist, si debtor ang nay burden of proof na nabayran na niya or nabuhat na niya ang obligation. Siya ang nay legal certainty to show proof na nabuhat na ang obligation or na discharge na niya ang obligation. Pede ra if magbayad sa utang then mangayo ug resibo for the proof of payment Article 1234: If the obligation has been substantially performed in good faith, the obligor may recover as though there had been a strict and complete fulfillness, less damage suffered by the oblige. Also known as The Substatial Performance in Good Faith Rule. Usa ni siyas exception sa dapat ang payment kompleto or buo ang bayad para maextinguish ang obligation. Naa ni duha ka requisites in which are: Substantial Performance ug dapat in Good Faith. Dili siya pede na substantial ra dapat in good faith ug substantial jud siya. Example: Pogi obliged himself to sell 100 bags of cement to Ganda for a certain price dayun despite the diligent effort sa part ni Pogi, dili madeliver ni Pogi ang 100 bags of cement kay Ganda nya ang kaya ra madeliver ni Pogi ato na time is 95 bags of cement ra kay tungod nay “valid rason” si Pogi kay naay shortage sa cement. Pero si Pogi diri ganahan jud niya ma comply ang obligation ang pag deliver pero di niya mabuhat kay beyond his control kuwang or nagkashortage ang cement in which he acted in good faith kay di baya niya macontrol ang cemento lisod pug mag kawt siyag wala didto. Maka recover pa sa pag deliver niya Pogi kay naa may complete delivery pero ma kwaan ang price na bayrunon ni Ganda since 95 raman ka semento ang na deliver ni Pogi. So since Pogi acted in good faith naningkamot jud siya mo oblige sa obligation pero lagi nagkaproblema na wala niya naexpect or di niya control, mabayran gihapon siya ni Ganda pero much lesser lang kibali ang bayran ni Ganda is ang 95 lang.
pede si Stranger na way labot sa kontrata or way interest sa kontrata na pede siya mobayad, in which pede modawat si creditor gikan niya. End of Article 1236 Paragraph one Whoever pays for another may demand from the debtor what he has paid, except that if he paid without the knowledge or against the will of the debtor, he can recover only insofar as the payment has been beneficial to the debtor. Unsay epekto sa payment sa us aka third person or stranger nya wa siyay labot or interest sa kontrata pero ganahan siya magbayad so unsay epek ani? So ibahin nato ni siyag 2 ka concept
Sample Problem: a. answer: X cannot foreclose mortgaged property kay wala man siyay consent, wala siyay legal subrogation, ang kaya ra unta niyang buhaton is mangayo ug reimbursement pero insolvent naman si D kay insolvent man siya so wala na. b. answer: Diri pede na ma foreclose ni X ang mortgage ni D kay kahibaw man si D ug nisugot man si D na mobayad si X sa utang ni D tapos na insolvent man siya nya kay naa may subrogation pede ma foreclose ni X ang mortgage ni D. Article 1237: Whoever pays on behalf of the debtor without the knowledge or against the will of the latter, cannot compel the creditor to subrogate him in his rights, such as those arising from a mortgage, guaranty, or penalty. Recourse – pede lain ang gamiton or pangayuon sa fulfillment or pede kwaon niya imong mortgage as a substitute or kwarta jud. ^ SUBROGATION PLUS PEDE NIYA ILISAN ANG OBLIGATION PEDE SIYA MANGAYO FOR ^ MORTGAGING ASIDE FROM PAG PANGAYO SA AMOUNT SA UTANG ANG UTANG RAJUD IYANG MAPANGAYO