

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Information from three geological studies: hill et al. (st helens), patro and egbert (cascadia), and becken et al. (safod). The studies discuss various aspects of geology, including contour drawing justification, ambiguous color scales, fluid origins, model assumptions, and fluid conductivity. The studies also touch upon skin effects and correlation to known geology.
Typology: Slides
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Figure 1: Is the extent to which they draw contours to the N justified? Color scales on figures ambiguous Where does the fluid come from? Does the model make sense?
Siletzia appears bigger than thought Depth of peak conductivity is the for most locations − Skin effects? Overall good correlation to known geology