Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Mathematical Induction assignment, Assignments of Discrete Mathematics

2 whole questions on mathematical induction

Typology: Assignments

2022/2023

Uploaded on 12/04/2023

cheta-okonkwo
cheta-okonkwo 🇨🇦

1 document

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
OKONKWO CHETACHUKWU MTH 221 200503194
Assignment 3
Question 1
Check the case when n = 5. The conjecture states:
(
2n
n
)
<22n2
Show that:
(
10
5
)
<28
Calculating the values:
(
10
5
)
=10 !
5(105)!=10 !
5!5!=10 ×9×8×7×6
5×4×3×2×1=252
Hence n = 5 checks out because
(
10
5
)
=25 228=256 ,252<256
Assuming the conjecture holds for some positive integer k ≥ 5, i.e.,
(
2k
k
)
<22k2
Prove that the conjecture also holds for k+1, i.e.,
(
2(k+1)
k+1
)
<22(k+1)−2
Calculating the binomial coefficient on the left side:
(
2(k+1)
k+1
)
=(2k+2)!
(k+1)!(2k+2
(
k+1
)
)!=(2k+2)!
(k+1)!
(
k+1
)
!
Using the inductive assumption:
(
2k
k
)
<22k2
This means that:
Rewriting the expression for
(
2(k+1)
k+1
)
using this information:
(
2(k+1)
k+1
)
=(2k+2)!
(k+1)!
(
k+1
)
!
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Mathematical Induction assignment and more Assignments Discrete Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Assignment 3

Question 1

Check the case when n = 5. The conjecture states:

2 n

n

2 n − 2

Show that:

8

Calculating the values:

10 × 9 × 8 × 7 × 6

5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1

Hence n = 5 checks out because

8

Assuming the conjecture holds for some positive integer k ≥ 5, i.e.,

2 k

k

2 k − 2

Prove that the conjecture also holds for k+1, i.e.,

2 ( k + 1 )

k + 1

2 ( k + 1 )− 2

Calculating the binomial coefficient on the left side:

2 ( k + 1 )

k + 1

( 2 k + 2 )!

( k + 1 )! ( 2 k + 2 −

k + 1

( 2 k + 2 )!

( k + 1 )!

k + 1

Using the inductive assumption:

2 k

k

2 k − 2

This means that:

( 2 k )!

k! k!

2 k − 2

Rewriting the expression for

2 ( k + 1 )

k + 1

using this information:

2 ( k + 1 )

k + 1

( 2 k + 2 )!

( k + 1 )!

k + 1

2 ( k + 1 )

k + 1

( 2 k + 2 )( 2 k + 1 )( 2 k )!

( k + 1 )!

k + 1

Divide both sides by

2 k

k

2 ( k + 1 )

k + 1

2 k

k

( 2 k + 2 )( 2 k + 1 )( 2 k )!

( k + 1 )! ( k + 1 )!

( 2 k )!

k !k!

Simplify:

2 ( k + 1 )

k + 1

2 k

k

( 2 k + 2 )( 2 k + 1 )

( k + 1 )( k + 1 )

Using the inductive assumption:

( 2 k + 2 )( 2 k + 1 )

( k + 1 )( k + 1 )

2 k − 2

( 2 k + 2 )( 2 k + 1 )

( k + 1 ) ( k + 1 )

( 2 k + 2 )( 2 k + 1 )

( k + 1 )

k + 1

2 k − 2

( 2 k + 2 )

RHS of the inequality for k+1:

2 ( k + 1 )− 2

2 k

2

2 k

See that, 4 2

2 k

2 k − 2

( 2 k + 2 ) since 4 > 2k + 2, and therefore:

2 k

2 k − 2

( 2 k + 2 )

Combining both inequalities:

( 2 k + 2 )( 2 k + 1 )

( k + 1 )

k + 1

2 ( k + 1 )− 2

By mathematical induction, the conjecture is proven for all natural numbers n ≥ 5.

Question 2

Check the case when n = 2. The conjecture states:

n <

n

∙n