Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

ME458 Lab 7: Investigating Damping Materials for Noise Control in ME Systems, Study notes of Noise Control

In this laboratory experiment, students will measure the loss factor and damping ratio of three cantilevered beams with different damping treatments using an impact hammer and various analysis methods. The objective is to determine the effectiveness of free layer and constrained layer damping in minimizing noise radiation in thin sheet metal structures. Students will document their test procedure, instrumentation, calculations, results, and conclusions in a professional report.

Typology: Study notes

2012/2013

Uploaded on 10/02/2013

kali
kali 🇮🇳

4.5

(37)

109 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ME458 Lab 7 8/17/2000 page 1
ME 458 Noise Control
Laboratory #7
Layered Damping Materials
Objectives:
1. Perform basic vibration measurements,
2. Investigate layered damping materials,
3. Determine loss factor using free vibration decay
4. Determine damping loss factor using an impact hammer and FFT analysis
5. Predict natural frequency of a simple beam
Background: Thin sheet metal structures are notorious for radiating lots of noise.
Engine valve covers and oil pans are good examples. An effective technique for
minimizing noise radiation (under certain conditions) is to add an elastomeric damping
layer to the structure. In this experiment, we will measure the loss factor of three
cantilevered beams with different damping treatments. Damping of the beams is
achieved via two different methods: free layer damping and constrained layer
damping.
Equipment: Each beam is equipped with a piezoelectric accelerometer mounted near
the tip of the beam to measure its vibration. The accelerometer output is measured with
an oscilloscope and/or a frequency analyzer.
Procedure:
1) Determine the resonance frequency of the three beams (undamped, free layer
damping, and constrained layer damping) using the impact hammer. Plot the
frequency response of the beams. Calculate the natural frequency of the beam from
its dimensions (using the NASA tables).
2) Determine the damping ratio and loss factor using the Q factor method (width of the
peak between half power points). Look up the appropriate formulas in your ME54
textbook.
3) Determine the critical damping ratio and the loss factor using the log decrement
method for each beam. Look up the appropriate formulas in your ME54 textbook.
Comment on the effectiveness of the damping methods. Compare the measured
vibration values to the expected attenuation at resonance (change in sound or vibration
level due to addition of damping), calculated by:
b
L
η
η
log20=
where: η = loss factor after treatment ηb = loss factor before treatment
L = change in level (Insertion Loss) (dB)
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download ME458 Lab 7: Investigating Damping Materials for Noise Control in ME Systems and more Study notes Noise Control in PDF only on Docsity!

ME458 Lab 7 8/17/2000 page 1

ME 458 Noise Control

Laboratory

Layered Damping Materials

Objectives:

  1. Perform basic vibration measurements,
  2. Investigate layered damping materials,
  3. Determine loss factor using free vibration decay
  4. Determine damping loss factor using an impact hammer and FFT analysis
  5. Predict natural frequency of a simple beam

Background: Thin sheet metal structures are notorious for radiating lots of noise. Engine valve covers and oil pans are good examples. An effective technique for minimizing noise radiation (under certain conditions) is to add an elastomeric damping layer to the structure. In this experiment, we will measure the loss factor of three cantilevered beams with different damping treatments. Damping of the beams is achieved via two different methods: free layer damping and constrained layer damping.

Equipment: Each beam is equipped with a piezoelectric accelerometer mounted near the tip of the beam to measure its vibration. The accelerometer output is measured with an oscilloscope and/or a frequency analyzer.

Procedure:

  1. Determine the resonance frequency of the three beams (undamped, free layer damping, and constrained layer damping) using the impact hammer. Plot the frequency response of the beams. Calculate the natural frequency of the beam from its dimensions (using the NASA tables).
  2. Determine the damping ratio and loss factor using the Q factor method (width of the peak between half power points). Look up the appropriate formulas in your ME textbook.
  3. Determine the critical damping ratio and the loss factor using the log decrement method for each beam. Look up the appropriate formulas in your ME54 textbook.

Comment on the effectiveness of the damping methods. Compare the measured vibration values to the expected attenuation at resonance (change in sound or vibration level due to addition of damping), calculated by:

b

L

∆ = 20 log

where: η = loss factor after treatment ηb = loss factor before treatment ∆L = change in level (Insertion Loss) (dB)

ME458 Lab 7 8/17/2000 page 2

System Diagram (block diagram showing all electrical connections) :

Reporting Requirements: Thoroughly document your test procedure, instrumentation, calculations, results, observations and conclusions in a full-length, professional quality report. Under what conditions is a damping layer effective and justified? What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of constrained layer versus free layer damping?