Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Keyword paper about themes learned in the books that were read in the first half of CWL242, Summaries of Literature

CWL 242 Professor John Barnard Spring 2023

Typology: Summaries

2021/2022

Uploaded on 05/15/2025

shashank-bhagavatula
shashank-bhagavatula 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Keyword Paper #1: Money/Wealth
by: Shashank Bhagavatula
The idea of money and wealth is something that has been deeply explored throughout the course
of 18th and 19th century world literature. Several authors of the Enlightenment and Romantic
periods have satirized the theme of wealth in their works, which revolve around the superficial
status boost that excess wealth provides and then later closely examine the flaws of wealthy
people. In particular, the works of Candide by Voltaire, The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx,
and An Enemy of the People by Henrik Ibsen are works in these eras that truly showcase the
exaggerated nature of wealth and status.
Candide is a story written by French author Voltaire that depicts the journey of Candide through
the struggles of life in a romantic lens. Candide, eventually in the story, acquires a fortune in El
Dorado – the city of gold – and hopes to use it in a way to find Cunégonde. While there, he and
his friend Cacambo marvel at the immense amount of gold and wealth that people possessed.
Education is focused on the sciences and philosophy. Kids in the playground are playing with
diamonds and gold, which they treat like “pebbles and dirt.” Through these majestic images,
Voltaire has essentially made El Dorado a utopia where nothing seems to go wrong; the
education system is magnificent, the dining is extravagant, and the poverty rate is nonexistent.
However, by creating a “perfect world,” he also expresses his dissatisfaction with the idea of
excessive wealth. Because El Dorado is such a grandiose place, the city residents are to the point
where they believe to be “sheltered from the rapaciousness of European nations” because of the
value of their so-called pebbles and dirt. Even when Candide gets his desirable handfuls of
“pebbles” from El Dorado to take with him to the real world, the wealth gives more
disadvantages for him than benefits. He later becomes the prime target for the Suriname officers
– who leave him with just two sheep – and Vanderdendur, who takes Candide’s remaining
wealth with him on his boat in an elaborate swindling effort. After all these successful attempts
to take Candide’s wealth away from him, he reaches a mental low point; “the villainy of
mankind presented itself to his mind in all its deformity, and his mind dwelt only on gloomy
thoughts.” Overall, Voltaire shows through Candide’s time in El Dorado that as much as living
in poverty and powerlessness is terrible, acquiring money to solve that problem creates more
problems without solving the main problem.
In a more historical lens, Karl Marx, in his work The Communist Manifesto, vividly describes the
class antagonism that he experienced between the bourgeoisie (the wealthy) and the proletariat
(the working class). At the time this work was written, the rise of the Industrial Revolution in
Russia created more mechanized modes of manufacturing, which rewrote the social structure
into the industrial leaders (bourgeoisie) and the workers (proletariat). Marx states that “the place
of manufacture was taken by . . . industrial millionaires, the leaders of the whole industrial
armies,” suggesting that there was an opportunity for the wealthy and working class to share this
responsibility, but the wealthy seized it all due to their greed for excess wealth. This want for
more money has also, according to Marx, caused the wealthy to center all human interaction
around exchange of money. In the capitalist system that Russia was running in, the most
important thought of any face-to-face conversation was to find a way to gain money, leaving “no
other nexus between man and man, . . . than callous ‘cash payment’”. Marx emphasizes through
this detrimental interchange between two men that no one in society really cares about how one
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Keyword paper about themes learned in the books that were read in the first half of CWL242 and more Summaries Literature in PDF only on Docsity!

Keyword Paper #1: Money/Wealth by: Shashank Bhagavatula The idea of money and wealth is something that has been deeply explored throughout the course of 18th^ and 19th^ century world literature. Several authors of the Enlightenment and Romantic periods have satirized the theme of wealth in their works, which revolve around the superficial status boost that excess wealth provides and then later closely examine the flaws of wealthy people. In particular, the works of Candide by Voltaire, The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx, and An Enemy of the People by Henrik Ibsen are works in these eras that truly showcase the exaggerated nature of wealth and status. Candide is a story written by French author Voltaire that depicts the journey of Candide through the struggles of life in a romantic lens. Candide, eventually in the story, acquires a fortune in El Dorado – the city of gold – and hopes to use it in a way to find Cunégonde. While there, he and his friend Cacambo marvel at the immense amount of gold and wealth that people possessed. Education is focused on the sciences and philosophy. Kids in the playground are playing with diamonds and gold, which they treat like “pebbles and dirt.” Through these majestic images, Voltaire has essentially made El Dorado a utopia where nothing seems to go wrong; the education system is magnificent, the dining is extravagant, and the poverty rate is nonexistent. However, by creating a “perfect world,” he also expresses his dissatisfaction with the idea of excessive wealth. Because El Dorado is such a grandiose place, the city residents are to the point where they believe to be “sheltered from the rapaciousness of European nations” because of the value of their so-called pebbles and dirt. Even when Candide gets his desirable handfuls of “pebbles” from El Dorado to take with him to the real world, the wealth gives more disadvantages for him than benefits. He later becomes the prime target for the Suriname officers

  • who leave him with just two sheep – and Vanderdendur, who takes Candide’s remaining wealth with him on his boat in an elaborate swindling effort. After all these successful attempts to take Candide’s wealth away from him, he reaches a mental low point; “the villainy of mankind presented itself to his mind in all its deformity, and his mind dwelt only on gloomy thoughts.” Overall, Voltaire shows through Candide’s time in El Dorado that as much as living in poverty and powerlessness is terrible, acquiring money to solve that problem creates more problems without solving the main problem. In a more historical lens, Karl Marx, in his work The Communist Manifesto, vividly describes the class antagonism that he experienced between the bourgeoisie (the wealthy) and the proletariat (the working class). At the time this work was written, the rise of the Industrial Revolution in Russia created more mechanized modes of manufacturing, which rewrote the social structure into the industrial leaders (bourgeoisie) and the workers (proletariat). Marx states that “the place of manufacture was taken by... industrial millionaires, the leaders of the whole industrial armies,” suggesting that there was an opportunity for the wealthy and working class to share this responsibility, but the wealthy seized it all due to their greed for excess wealth. This want for more money has also, according to Marx, caused the wealthy to center all human interaction around exchange of money. In the capitalist system that Russia was running in, the most important thought of any face-to-face conversation was to find a way to gain money, leaving “no other nexus between man and man,... than callous ‘cash payment’”. Marx emphasizes through this detrimental interchange between two men that no one in society really cares about how one

can make society better and more accomplished; rather, they care about others’ wealth and possessions. As a suggestion to solve these problems, instead of concentrating the wealth on the upper tier of people, Marx suggests that the proletariat “use its political supremacy... to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the state.” The key difference that sets apart the existing capitalist government with the proposed “communist” government is that the wealth be distributed equally among the people. To sum, Marx’s proposal to fix the issue of concentrated wealth highlights the problems with the higher class and shows how the class divide unfairly discriminates theoretically equal people. Combining all these ideas into a real-world issue, An Enemy of the People addresses the upper class and show that they can’t better the society around them for the fear of losing money. In the story, Dr. Stockmann proposes an idea to fix the pollution in the Baths to the media so that his idea can be publicized. Before publishing these findings, Stockmann takes a very optimistic view of the press and the mayor’s character and demeanor when it comes to addressing problems. However, when Peter Stockmann - the mayor of the town and subsequently the wealthiest - interferes with the press and bribes them to not publish the article, the public opinion flips on the Doctor. The Doctor even confronts Aslaksen, a member of the press, to address this issue of the press being controlled, arguing that “[he is] the editor; and an editor controls his paper, I suppose!” To this, Aslaksen responds that “it is the subscribers”. Both Peter and Aslaksen are exploiting their rule over the townspeople to keep them happy while furthering their respective agendas. The Doctor even states that “my brother Peter is every bit as plebeian as anyone that walks in two shoes…,” showcasing his discontent with the handling of his research and his appalled reaction to the contrast between his thoughts and reality. Later, in his intense monologue about the wealthy, he compares them to “cur-men” that were born from an “ill-bred strain of animals,” subtly including the idea that they can rise from any rank and status and yet still favor the unintelligent public. All in all, while the Doctor envisions his research of the Baths to fix the class system that existed in the town, the introduction of his idea opened his eyes to the corruption of the wealthy and their effort to conserve as much money as possible while pushing their agenda. Through these three works, the idea of wealth and status is examined to be something that takes over human beings in a negative way. While it provides a perceived notion of being higher up in the socioeconomic ladder, the reality is that the people are consumed by the greed of wanting more and, in turn, start to make irrational decisions. The exploration of such idea in the time period of the 18th^ and 19th^ centuries gave way to new forms of government and rule, as the idea of sharing the wealth versus concentrating the wealth created a strong political divide amongst the people. In the end, without any of these revolutionary works, society as a whole would not have as developed of an understanding of money as they do now.