



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The book "Kartilya ng Katipunan" is written by Apolinario Mabini
Typology: Study notes
Uploaded on 09/16/2023
1 document
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
The Kartilya ng Katipunan served as the guidebook for new members of the organization, which laid out the group's rules and principles. The first edition of the Kartilya was written by Andres Bonifacio, Emilio Jacinto will later pen a revised Decalogue. This is a secondary source that made use of the minutes of a supreme assembly dated December 1895 as a primary source and was published in the year 2013. Richardson's and Jacinto's documents were published for the Filipino people; Emilio's kartila primarily wrote the document for the recruits of katipunan. The author is Jim Richardson, an american photographer for National Geographic Magazine and contributing editor to TRAVELER Magazine.
Emilio Jacinto was an eloquent and brave young man that brought him in the position for the "Brain of Katipunan". He wrote a newspaper entitled " Kalyaan" and was the author of "Kartilya ng Katipunan". This is the guide book for new members and current members of katipunan. He was one of the highest ranking officers in the Philippines Revolution and was one of the highest ranking officers of the revolutionary society Kataas - taasang, Kagalang - galangang na Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan or simply and more popularly called Katipunan, being a member of its Supreme Council. He was elected secretary of the State for the Haring Bayang Katagalugan, a revolutionary government established during the outbreak of hostilities. He is popularly known in Philippine History texbooks as the Basis of the Katipunan while some content he should be rightfully recognized as the "Brain of the Revolution" (a title given to Apolinario Mabini). Jacinto was present in the Cry of Pugad Lawin with Andres Bonifacio, the supremo of the katipunan, and others of its member which signated the start of tge Revolution against the spanish colonial government in the island. He's real name is Emilio Jacinto y Dizon and is from Tondo Manila. He is known for his pen name, "pingkian" "Dimasilaw" "ka llyong". He was married to Catalina de Jesus who was pregnant at the time of his death. The fist edition of the Kartilya was written by Andres bonifacio but is a later on revised as Decalogue by Emilio Jacinto.
The Kataas-taasan, kagalanggalangang na katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan (KKK) or Katipunan is arguably the most important organization formed in the Philippine History. The two principal aims of the KKK as gathered from the writings of Bonifacio.
ideological and political foundation constructed by men and women who sacrificed themselves because of their love for the country and for the people. Just like Rizal who pushed Filipinos to think critically with full understanding, this code of conduct was made to inform people of what they deserve to know for making their lives better. Going back to the past, the journey to freedom is long and hard. The price of bravery and principle is high. Back then, they thought that the day of real freedom will forever remain a dream. And through Kartilya ng Katipunan, Filipinos were united to fight for what they own. Kartilya ng Katipunan became an oath the every Katipuneros must follow to show their determination in being a part of the people who wanted a change. And while we have different interpretation with what was intended by Bonifacio, there is one thing that everyone can agree on: Kartilya ng Katipunan was meant to guide us in living our everyday life to the fullest. More importantly, it highlights the importance of having the right attitude towards other people.
This published material of Emilio Jacinto serve as a great contributor of our history back then as well as today. Given that this book covers moral values, certain norms, principle and guide for all the Katipuneros on the time-being of Sapanish Colonial. Jacinto also defined the true diety (kabanalan) as charity, love for one another, deeds and speech guided by judicous reason. For an instance, this contains guides and laws that prominent katipuneros abide, Jacinto point out that katipuneros should be fair and just no matter what race you come from and what gender you have. As well as unfairly treat of woman should not be practiced. On that time, this book be able to help Katipuneros to reflect themselves. This book been able to put a good mark on our history as the katipuneros back then were guided by this Kartilya and left us to understand what was living is. Leaving us the word Katipunero Ideology. Therefore, Primer of the Katipunero served as a great contribution on lur history and to all Filipino as well, leaving a good moral character and shaping ourselves to mold a better world For the Katipunan leadership, such as Emilio Jacinto, the ideas of Right and Light, Katwiran and Kaliwanagan, were of utmost importance. They saw themselves as not only as inheritors of the Age of Enlightenment, but intellectual and moral revolutionaries fighting to create and define a nation and culture that was post-Enlightenment; that was no longer shackled by the ideological and colonial restraints of the West, but a country that adopted and merged the best of Spain, the United States, France, and our own unique culture and society, in support of being Filipino.
The Kartilya was the moral and intellectual foundation used to guide the actions of Katipuneros. Upon joining the Katipunan, members were required to read the Kartilya and adhere to its code of conduct. Changing the way people thought and acted was paramount to the early Katipuñeros; they understand that was the only way to truly change the Philippines for the better. Play-acting as and implicitly referencing the Katipunan without fully understanding their political and moral context and goals essentially degrades the breadth of what they were trying to achieve. Then again, we always forget that the Katipunan, upon inception and in action, was not the mass movement it is commonly mooted as, but one of the middle class, even the upper middle class. In the context of 19th century Philippines, these men were highly educated and socially mobile. They were critically thinking, well read, and (in some cases) well traveled individuals who conceptualized a new Philippines. One founded on egalitarianism, even while recognizing that social differences will exist. Of course the Katipunan was not the only organization working towards independence. They built on the ideological and political foundation constructed by men and women who sacrificed much for their dreams of independence. They were not an organization that sprung fully formed from among the masa, nor were they an organization that operated independently of contemporaries and predecessors. The actual lessons of the Revolution, the hard work of reformism, the need to define politically and ideologically end goals, the paramount urgency of education and inculcating broader values, is ignored in favor of the Adoration of Revolt, the Cult of the Revolutionary, the Primacy of Personality. I would argue that our misunderstanding of the 19th century feeds directly into some of the public factionalism and fracturing we witness today. What is in interesting is when studying the works of Emilio Jacinto, Apolinario Mabini, Marcelo H del Pilar, and (most importantly) Jose Rizal, we discover exhortations towards intellectualism, not just militancy and violence. In many cases, such as with Rizal, he pushes the need to change the way Filipinos critically think and engage with issues before armed revolt. It is a distinction that is either glossed over or outright ignored in many of today’s texts. These men were intellectual giants who espoused a new understanding citizenship and engagement that eludes us still. The shame is they understood that lasting change takes place in the hearts and minds of men first, and what they subsequently build after. Not in spontaneous displays of strength of arms, the might of the sword, and the fleeting nature of purely personality based revolutionary action. We seemingly favor the latter, while forgetting the former.