Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Literature Review: A Comprehensive Guide for Students, Lecture notes of Accounting

A comprehensive guide to writing a literature review, covering its purpose, components, and step-by-step process. It includes examples and annotations to illustrate key concepts and best practices. Particularly useful for students in academic disciplines where research and scholarly writing are essential.

Typology: Lecture notes

2023/2024

Uploaded on 04/02/2025

student_girl
student_girl 🇵🇭

5 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Literature Review
What is a literature review?
A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources that provides an overview of a particular
topic. Literature reviews are a collection of the most relevant and significant publications
regarding that topic in order to provide a comprehensive look at what has been said on the
topic and by whom. The basic components of a literature review include
a description of the publication;
a reference to the author’s credentials;
a summary of the publication’s main points;
an evaluation of the publication’s contribution to the topic.
What is the difference between a literature review and an annotated bibliography?
An annotated bibliography is a list of your references with a summary of the content and the
publication’s relationship to your research question. A literature review is an overview of the
topic, an explanation of how publications differ from one another, and an examination of how
each publication contributes to the discussion and understanding of the topic.
What is the purpose of a literature review?
The purpose of a literature review is to provide a review of writings on the given topic in order
to establish the reviewer’s own position in the existing field of scholarship on that topic. A
literature review provides a reader with a comprehensive look at previous discussions prior to
the one the reviewer will be making in his/her own research paper, thesis, or dissertation. In
short, a literature review shows readers where the reviewer is entering the academic
conversation on a particular topic in the context of existing scholarship.
How do I create a literature review?
The length and depth of your literature review depends on the length of your project. If you
are writing a 10-page argument paper, you may have room to include 5-6 sources to review,
because you will also be establishing your argument as well, but there’s no hard equation for
how many/how much. Use your judgment or consult your instructor.
Here is a step-by-step approach to drafting your literature review:
1. Define Your Goal. If you are writing an argument paper, create a thesis statement with
a clear position. If you are evaluating scientific theories, develop a hypothesis to
examine. If you are providing a self-contained review of writings on a topic, state your
project’s purpose. At the beginning of any paper, define your paper’s purpose so that
the literature review will be anchored to a specific point of view.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Literature Review: A Comprehensive Guide for Students and more Lecture notes Accounting in PDF only on Docsity!

Literature Review

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources that provides an overview of a particular topic. Literature reviews are a collection of the most relevant and significant publications regarding that topic in order to provide a comprehensive look at what has been said on the topic and by whom. The basic components of a literature review include

  • a description of the publication;
  • a reference to the author’s credentials;
  • a summary of the publication’s main points;
  • an evaluation of the publication’s contribution to the topic. What is the difference between a literature review and an annotated bibliography? An annotated bibliography is a list of your references with a summary of the content and the publication’s relationship to your research question. A literature review is an overview of the topic, an explanation of how publications differ from one another, and an examination of how each publication contributes to the discussion and understanding of the topic. What is the purpose of a literature review? The purpose of a literature review is to provide a review of writings on the given topic in order to establish the reviewer’s own position in the existing field of scholarship on that topic. A literature review provides a reader with a comprehensive look at previous discussions prior to the one the reviewer will be making in his/her own research paper, thesis, or dissertation. In short, a literature review shows readers where the reviewer is entering the academic conversation on a particular topic in the context of existing scholarship. How do I create a literature review? The length and depth of your literature review depends on the length of your project. If you are writing a 10-page argument paper, you may have room to include 5-6 sources to review, because you will also be establishing your argument as well, but there’s no hard equation for how many/how much. Use your judgment or consult your instructor. Here is a step-by-step approach to drafting your literature review:
  1. Define Your Goal. If you are writing an argument paper, create a thesis statement with a clear position. If you are evaluating scientific theories, develop a hypothesis to examine. If you are providing a self-contained review of writings on a topic, state your project’s purpose. At the beginning of any paper, define your paper’s purpose so that the literature review will be anchored to a specific point of view.
  1. Do Your Research. Review a number of texts that most closely pertain to your topic and position and are written by relevant scholars. Understand who the top voices are in your topic’s academic field, and be sure to include the most pertinent publications by those scholars.
  2. Ground Summary in Relevance. As you summarize each publication, provide the context for that publication’s importance by tying its main points to your thesis, hypothesis, or project statement. How does it relate? Establish its relevance to the discussion.
  3. Develop Review Logically. Think of your literature review as a development of an argument—what were the earliest ideas on the topic and how did they grow and evolve in the academic conversation of these publications? First things first.
  4. Include References/Works Cited List. As you are writing the literature review you will mention the author names and the publication years in your text, but you will still need to compile comprehensive citations for each entry at the end of your review. Follow APA or MLA guidelines, as your course requires.

A sample Literature Review section with Annotations follows on the next page.

through 6 years old when studying EA (Aouad & Nasr, 2005). When EA was first described by Eckenhoff in 1961, it was speculated that patients undergoing head and neck procedures may have a sense of suffocation during emergence from anesthesia, thus increasing the chance of EA. Surgical procedures that have been found to increase the risk of developing EA are otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology, and neck procedures, all of which may produce a sense of suffocation (Aouad & Nasr, 2005; Vlajkovic & Sindjelic, 2007; Voepel-Lewis, Malviya, & Tait, 2003). The length of surgery in at least one study was found to be a factor associated with increased incidence of EA (Voepel-Lewis, Malviya, & Tait, 2003). In most studies, patients have been excluded if they were above ASA classes I and II, which is one limitation of the current literature (Baum, Yemen, & Baum, 1997). Exclusion criteria also included children with psychological or emotional disorders, developmental delay, and patients who needed sedative medication before induction (Abu- Shahwan, 2008). Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia Propofol TIVA techniques have also demonstrated a reduction in EA in children. In the study by Cohen et al (2003) of sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia versus a propofol TIVA technique, there were significantly higher rates of EA in the sevoflurane group compared with the propofol group (23.1% versus 3.7%). In the study by Picard et al (2000) of the quality of recovery in children, a sevoflurane inhalational anesthetic and propofol TIVA techniques were compared, with a reduction in EA rates observed in the propofol TIVA group (46% versus 9%, respectively). A reduction in EA from 42% to 11% was seen in children 2 to 5 years of age with propofol TIVA compared with sevoflurane inhalational general anesthesia (Nakayama, Furukawa, & Yanai, 2007). In a small study of children presenting for eye surgery (n = 16),

Each literature reviewsubtopic has its own thesis statement that isthen “proven” through research publications.the review of existing

[

[ ]

]

reference the first^ It is important to instance of researchon your topic.

propofol TIVA technique had an EA incidence of 0%, in contrast to a cohort managed with sevoflurane inhalational general anesthetic, which produced an EA incidence of 38% (Uezono et al, 2000). The studies summarized in Table 3 compare EA rates in sevoflurane alone, propofol TIVA alone compared with sevoflurane alone, and propofol adjunct together with sevoflurane compared with sevoflurane alone. The study findings demonstrate that either using propofol adjunctively or using propofol TIVA results in lower rates of EA compared with either sevoflurane alone or sevoflurane with adjunctive propofol. According to the literature evidence base, there is an advantage to either propofol TIVA or adjunctive propofol with sevoflurane (compared with sevoflurane alone). We conclude, based on the current evidence, that the use of propofol is associated with a reduction in the incidence of emergence agitation.

References Abu-Shahwan, I. (2008). Effect of propofol on emergence behavior in children after sevoflurane general anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth, 18(1), 55–59. Aono, J., Mamiya, K., & Manabe, M. (1999). Preoperative anxiety is associated with a high incidence of problematic behavior on emergence after halothane anesthesia in boys. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 43(5), 542–544. Aouad, M. T. & Nasr, V. G. (2005). Emergence agitation in children: an update. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 18(6), 614–619. Cohen, I. T., Finkel, J. C., Hannallah, R. S., Hummer, K. A., & Patel, K. M. (2003). Rapid emergence does not explain agitation following sevoflurane anaesthesia in infants and

Athe paper will include entries References list at the end of for each publication discussedin the literature review.

A literature reviewarticulates the purpose of your newproject, which is to current research or toeither fill a gap in provide the next stepin researching the topic.

[

]