

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Homework assignment 1 Macroeconomic II
Typology: Assignments
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Prof. X. Lei Department of Economics and Finance University of Guelph
Problem Set 1
labor market movement (even if capital does not fully depreciates). One way to generate more movement in labor input is by differentiating the extensive margin (work or not) and the intenstive margin (hours). To see this, consider an economy populated with a continuum of infinitely-lived representative households whose preference is given by
u(ct, lt) = ln(ct) + b ln(1 ā lt) (1)
where ct, lt represent consumption and labor input respectively. Suppose that lt can only take the value of 0 < ĀÆl < 1 with probability pt or 0 with probability (1 ā pt). Intuitively, you can think that that labor is indivisible: you either donāt have a job, or you have a job and work 8 hours a day! Hansen argues that instead of having households to choose ct and lt, we can allow them to choose ct and pt. He also assumes that there is perfect insurance, i.e: whether you are drawn to work or not, you will always be getting paid the same wage rate. (This ensures that that the competitive equilibrium is also Pareto optimal.) Firms rent capital and labor for production with a production technology given by f (kt, lt) = Atktα l^1 t āα (2) and where the aggregate resource constraint is again given by
yt = ct + it (3)
Physical investment depreciates at the rate of Ī“.
(a) Write down the (ex-ante) expected flow utility of the households at the micro level. Whatās the value of Frisch elasticity at the micro level and the macro level, respectively? (b) What are the relevant state variables? What are the control variables? Using Lagrangian method, write down the system of equations that characterize the solution of the model in a decentralized economy (Hint: this should include the stochastic shock process, all the necessary first order conditions, aggregate resource constraint, as well as the transversality condition). (c) Compute the steady state of this economy. (d) Log-linearize the F.O.Cs and the aggregate resource constraint around the steady state values (You can eliminate wt as what we did in the lecture. That should leave you with four equations to log-linearize). (e) Letās making some fun predictions of the model without fully solving it. What results do you expect to see in terms of labor input as compared with the baseline RBC model that we discussed in the lecture? Interpret.
(a) In the lecture, we have derived the steady state value of labor input. Now compute the steady state value of all endogenous variables, then present the solution for ct, kt+1, yt, lt, rt, wt as a function of states and structural parameters. (b) Using MATLAB, generate the impulse response of a one standard deviation technology shock at t = 1 on ct, yt, lt, kt, rt, rt for 30 quarters using the following parameters: α = 13 , b = 2, ĻA =
95 , β = 0. 99 , ĻA = 1%. Please attach your code and the figures. (c) Let ĻA = 0.8, redo part (b) (You can present the same impulse response on one figure for comparison). How does the dynamics of those endogenous outcome changes? Interpret. (d) Let b = 0.5, redo part (b). How does the dynamics of those endogenous outcome changes? Interpret.
Question 3 In the lecture, we have solved a competitive equilibrium in the standard RBC model. In this frictionless economy, the optimal allocations of this economy should correspond to the solution of a social plannerās problem. This exercise allows you to verify this point using dynamic programming. We will focus on the case wheree Ī“ = 1. That is,
kt+1 = yt ā ct (4)
(a) Let V (kt, At) be the value function of the social planner, explain intuitively why V (kt, At) must satisfy the Bellman equation
V (kt, At) = max ct,lt
[ln ct + b ln(1 ā lt)] + βEt[V (kt+1, At+1)] (5)
(b) We will use a guess and verify approach to solve the value function. Let us guess
V (kt, At) = β 0 + βk ln kt + βA ln At (6)
Rewrite the value function without the expectation sign, and find the necessary first order condition for ct. Show that ct/yt is independent of kt or At. Interpret. (c) Find the necessary first order condition for lt, why does it not depend on At or kt? (d) Now we will verify our guess. This involves plugging in the two first order conditions back into the Bellman equation. Show that the resulting expression satisfies
V (kt, At) = β 0 Ⲡ+ βⲠk + β AⲠln At (7)
(e) Solve the value function by solving βk, βA. Whatās the implied value of ct/yt and lt. Do they take the same value as in the decentralized economy that we discussed in the lecture?