Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

ethnography and canadian linguistics, Assignments of Law

ethnography and canadian linguistics and anthropolohu

Typology: Assignments

2021/2022

Uploaded on 12/14/2023

ibrahim-27
ibrahim-27 🇨🇦

1 document

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
The documentary covers the origins of how we Canadians talk and why we spell things
differently. It covers why there is a disparity in our dialect and why we speak the way we do.
Moreover, Talking Canadian covers how exactly we speak today and how we will sound in the
future. The documentary looks at how we debate our pronunciation of words (such as either),
and how our accent is a mix of British and American influences. This can relate back to what we
learned in class about cultural anthropology. Going deeper, it relates to a subset of cultural
anthropology, that being ethnography. Ethnography is the study of an aspect of culture within
our society, and in this case, the Canadian accent is very much a part of the culture in this
country. Whenever someone brings up Canada, one of the first things that is mentioned is our
accent, and how it differs from other English-speaking places. In the episode, we meet a linguist
named Jack Chambers, who is an expert in the history of the Canadian accent and dialect. He
mentions how we used to call sofas, "chesterfields", which is what it was called in Britain. He
also adds on how it went from chesterfield, to sofas, and then to couch, which is used by most
people today. This can relate back to linguistic anthropology. Linguistic anthropology studies
the construction and use of words within a society, and in this case, Chambers discusses the idea
of how the word sofa originated from a completely different word due to the British influence
behind it. I think these ideas are relevant because they give us a background on how our country
was made in a way. We see how Canadian culture evolved overtime, but never forgot its roots.
Lots of people continue to use the same words that were used back then, such as "eh", or
pronouncing words different such as "about". Further, it gives us an idea of why we say certain
things and use certain words, even in basic conversations. To us, it may not seem very different
but to people even just outside Canada, it is a completely different dialect to them.

Partial preview of the text

Download ethnography and canadian linguistics and more Assignments Law in PDF only on Docsity!

The documentary covers the origins of how we Canadians talk and why we spell things differently. It covers why there is a disparity in our dialect and why we speak the way we do. Moreover, Talking Canadian covers how exactly we speak today and how we will sound in the future. The documentary looks at how we debate our pronunciation of words (such as either), and how our accent is a mix of British and American influences. This can relate back to what we learned in class about cultural anthropology. Going deeper, it relates to a subset of cultural anthropology, that being ethnography. Ethnography is the study of an aspect of culture within our society, and in this case, the Canadian accent is very much a part of the culture in this country. Whenever someone brings up Canada, one of the first things that is mentioned is our accent, and how it differs from other English-speaking places. In the episode, we meet a linguist named Jack Chambers, who is an expert in the history of the Canadian accent and dialect. He mentions how we used to call sofas, "chesterfields", which is what it was called in Britain. He also adds on how it went from chesterfield, to sofas, and then to couch, which is used by most people today. This can relate back to linguistic anthropology. Linguistic anthropology studies the construction and use of words within a society, and in this case, Chambers discusses the idea of how the word sofa originated from a completely different word due to the British influence behind it. I think these ideas are relevant because they give us a background on how our country was made in a way. We see how Canadian culture evolved overtime, but never forgot its roots. Lots of people continue to use the same words that were used back then, such as "eh", or pronouncing words different such as "about". Further, it gives us an idea of why we say certain things and use certain words, even in basic conversations. To us, it may not seem very different but to people even just outside Canada, it is a completely different dialect to them.