Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

DEVELOPMENT OF AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT BASED ON THE CHARACTER EDUCATION OF PANCASILA STUDENTS, Thesis of Particle Physics

This proposal seminar document discusses the development of authentic assessment tools based on the character education of the Pancasila Student Profiles for teaching Linear Motion Kinematics in Grade XI at SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi. It covers the research background, objectives, literature review, methodology, and sample assessment instruments designed to improve students’ critical thinking, problem-solving, and character values in line with the Merdeka Curriculum. This document is a valuable reference for educators and researchers interested in innovative assessment practices in physics education.

Typology: Thesis

2024/2025

Available from 06/29/2025

emeninta-pelawi
emeninta-pelawi 🇮🇩

4 documents

1 / 191

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN
DEVELOPMENT OF AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT BASED
ON THE CHARACTER EDUCATION OF PANCASILA
STUDENT PROFILES IN LINEAR MOTION
KINEMATICS FOR CLASS XI AT
SMA NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI
PROPOSAL SEMINAR
Submitted For Proposal Seminar
In Thesis Preparation
By :
Emeninta Angelina Natasya Pelawi
ID 4213121015
Bilingual Physics Education Study Program
PHYSICS DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES
MEDAN
2025
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3a
pf3b
pf3c
pf3d
pf3e
pf3f
pf40
pf41
pf42
pf43
pf44
pf45
pf46
pf47
pf48
pf49
pf4a
pf4b
pf4c
pf4d
pf4e
pf4f
pf50
pf51
pf52
pf53
pf54
pf55
pf56
pf57
pf58
pf59
pf5a
pf5b
pf5c
pf5d
pf5e
pf5f
pf60
pf61
pf62
pf63
pf64

Partial preview of the text

Download DEVELOPMENT OF AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT BASED ON THE CHARACTER EDUCATION OF PANCASILA STUDENTS and more Thesis Particle Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN

DEVELOPMENT OF AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT BASED

ON THE CHARACTER EDUCATION OF PANCASILA

STUDENT PROFILES IN LINEAR MOTION

KINEMATICS FOR CLASS XI AT

SMA NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI

PROPOSAL SEMINAR

Submitted For Proposal Seminar In Thesis Preparation

By :

Emeninta Angelina Natasya Pelawi ID 4213121015 Bilingual Physics Education Study Program

PHYSICS DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES

MEDAN

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... vi

iv

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1 Purpose of Using Authentic Assessment ...................................... 12 Figure 2.2 Authentic Assessment Framework ............................................... 14 Figure 2.3 Authentic assessment flow diagram ............................................. 19 Figure 2.4 Concept Map of Pancasila Student Profile Dimensions ............... 26 Figure 2.5 Borg & Gall Development Models ................................................ 38 Figure 2.7 The position of people cycling can be explained based on their location in relation to the building ................................................ 49 Figure 2.8 A teacher moves left and right while teaching. The professor's position relative to the Earth is given by x. The displacement of +2.0 m is represented by the arrow pointing to the right. ............................. 50 Figure 2.9 Timeline of Jill's movements ........................................................ 52 Figure 2.10 Graph of Jill's position versus time. The average velocity is shown by the slope of the line connecting the start and end points .............. 53 Figure 2.11 In a position versus time graph, the instantaneous velocity is the slope of the tangent line at a given point ................................................ 54 Figure 2.12 The object starts moving in the positive direction, pauses, and then reverses direction. This graph is a realistic approximation of the motion ........................................................................................... 55 Figure 2.13 The velocity is positive for the first part of the journey, zero when the object stops, and negative when the object reverses direction ..... 55 Figure 2.14 A train in Sao Paulo, Brazil, slows down as it enters station ........ 58 Figure 2.15 An object moving east with negative acceleration stops and reverses direction, eventually passing the origin ......................................... 58 Figure 2.16 Racehorses running out of the gate. ............................................... 59 Figure 2.17 Identify the coordinate system ....................................................... 59 Figure 2.18 Velocity versus time graph ........................................................... 60 Figure 2.19 Velocity versus time graph ........................................................... 61 Figure 2.20 Acceleration Diagram ................................................................... 63 Figure 2.21 The plane lands with an initial speed of 70.0 m/s and decelerates to a final speed of 10.0 m/s .................................................................. 64

vi

  • CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION........................................................................... ATTACHMENT LIST vii
  • 1.1 Background of the problem
  • 1.2 Identification of problems
  • 1.3 Scope of Research
  • 1.4 Scope of the Problem
  • 1.5 Formulation of the Problem
  • 1.6 Research Objectives
  • 1.7 Benefits of the Research
  • CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW
  • 2.1 Authentic Assessment
  • 2.1.1 Definition of Assessment
  • 2.1.2 Understanding Authentic Assessment
  • 2.1.3 Characteristics of Authentic Assessment
  • 2.1.4 Objectives and Principles of Authentic Assessment
  • 2.1.5 Authentic assessment techniques
  • 2.1.6 Types of Authentic Assessment and Their Implementation
  • 2.1.7 The Importance of Authentic Assessment in Education
  • 2.1.9 Benefits of Using Authentic Assessment
  • 2.1.10 Development of Authentic Assessment
  • 2.2 Character Education in the Pancasila Profile
  • 2.2.1 Definition of Character Education
  • 2.2.2 The Importance of Character Education
  • 2.2.3 Understanding the Pancasila Student Profile
  • 2.2.4 Character Education Pancasila Student Profile.......................................
    • Student Profiles 2.2.5 The Need for a Character Education Strengthening Project for Pancasila
  • 2.2.6 Principles of the Pancasila Student Profile Strengthening Project ii
    • Profile 2.2.8 Benefits of Strengthening Character Education in the Pancasila Student
  • 2.3 Research and Development Methods......................................................
  • 2.3.1 Understanding Research and Development Methods
  • 2.3.2 Characteristics of Research and Development
  • 2.3.3 R&D Components
  • 2.3.4 Modification of the R&D Stage by Experts
  • 2.4 Rasch Model Based Instrument Analysis
  • 2.4.1 Understanding Rasch Model-Based Instrument Analysis
  • 2.4.2 Implementation of the Rasch Model Using the Winstep Application
  • 2.4.3 Person Capability Analysis (Person Measure)
  • 2.4.4 Instrument Analysis and Statistical Summary
  • 2.4.5 Validity and Reliability in Rasch Modeling
  • 2.5 Kinematics of Linear Motion
  • 2.5 Learning Outcomes
    • Profile through Straight Line Kinematics Material 2.6 Relevance of Authentic Assessment in Developing the Pancasila Student
  • 2.7 Relevant Research
  • 2.8 Thinking Framework
    1. 9 Hypothesis...............................................................................................
  • CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
  • 3.1 Location and Time of Research
  • 3.2 Subjects and Objects of Research
  • 3.3 Research Design and Variables
  • 3.3.1 Research Design......................................................................................
  • 3.3.2 Research Variables..................................................................................
  • 3.4 Operational Definition
  • 3.5 Research Instruments
  • 3.5.1 Test Item Validation Sheet......................................................................
  • 3.5.2 Authentic Assessment Instruments iii
  • 3.6 Data Collection Techniques
  • 3.6.1 Literature Study
  • 3.6.2 Interview
  • 3.6.3 Tests
  • 3.6.4 Questionnaire
  • 3.7 Research Procedures
  • 3.8 Data Analysis Techniques.....................................................................
  • 3.8.1 Validity
  • 3.8.2 Reliability..............................................................................................
  • 3.8.3 Discriminating Power
  • 3.8.4 Difficulty Level
  • 3.8.5 Effectiveness of Distraction
  • 3.9 Assessment Instruments
  • 3.10 Eligibility Standards for Question Items...............................................
  • REFERENCES ...................................................................................................
  • ATTACHMENT.................................................................................................
  • Table 2.1 Comparison of Authentic and Traditional Assessment ..................... LIST OF TABLES
    • profile ................................................................................................ Table 2.2 Sub-element mapping table of the six dimensions of the Pancasila
  • Table 2.3 Criteria for determining Cronbach's Alpha value ............................
    • values ................................................................................................ Table 2.4 Criteria for determining Person Reliability and Item Reliability
  • Table 2.5 Jill's time, position, and displacement .............................................
  • Table 2.6 Authentic assessment indicators for physics understanding ............
  • Table 2.7 Process Skills Aspects .....................................................................
    • Education .......................................................................................... Table 2.8 Attitude Assessment Grid Based on Pancasila Profile Character
  • Table 2.9 Relevant Research Table .................................................................
  • Table 3.1 Expert Validation Instrument Grid ..................................................
  • Table 3.2 Main Materials and Characteristics of Authentic Assessment .........
  • Table 3.3 Authentic Assessment Grid for Linear Motion Kinematics .............
    • Understanding ................................................................................. Table 3.4 Authentic Assessment Indicators for Measuring Physics
  • Table 3.5 Authentic Assessment Indicators for Measuring Process Skills .....
    • in the Pancasila Student Profile ...................................................... Table 3.6 Authentic Assessment Indicators for Measuring Character Education
  • Table 3.7 Expert Validity Test Criteria...........................................................
  • Table 3.8 Interpretation of Product Moment Correlation ...............................
  • Table 3.9 Range of Reliability Categories ......................................................
  • Table 3.10 Criteria for Discriminating Power ................................................
  • Table 3.11 Criteria for Question Difficulty Level ............................................
  • Table 3.12 Student Response Level to Test Instruments ..................................
  • Table 3.13 Grid of Student Responses to Authentic Assessment Instruments.
  • Table 3.14 Criteria for Eligibility of Question Items ........................................

vii

ATTACHMENT LIST

Attachment 1. Teacher Needs Interview Questionnaire ................................... 123 Attachment 2. Results of the Teacher Interview Questionnaire ....................... 126 Attachment 3. Student Needs Analysis Questionnaire ..................................... 130 Attachment 4. Results of the Student Needs Questionnaire ............................. 131 Attachment 5. Permission letter to carry out observation ................................. 133 Attachment 6. Attitude Assessment Assessment of Pancasila Learner Profile 134 Attachment 7. Attitude Assessment Rubric Based on Pancasila Learner Profile Character ................................................................................... 135 Attachment 8. Attitude Observation Assessment of Pancasila Learner Profile ........................................................................................ 136 Attachment 9. Rubric for Process Skills Assessment ....................................... 137 Attachment 10. Attitude Observation Assessment of Pancasila Learner Profile ........................................................................................ 139 Attachment 11. Instrument Grids for Authentic Assessment Based on Pancasila Student Profile Character Education ......................................... 140 Attachment 12. Authentic Assessment Instrument Based on Pancasila Student Profile Character Education ...................................................... 143 Attachment 13. Authentic Assessment Instrument Scoring Guidelines ............. 150 Attachment 14. Expert Validation Sheet Questionnaire ..................................... 176

2

The results of interviews with physics teachers at SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi show that authentic assessment is understood as an instrument designed based on real situations that occur in everyday life. Teachers recognize the importance of applying authentic assessment in physics learning, especially to help students understand the application of physics concepts in life. Teachers also often create authentic assessment questions on each subject matter as an approach to increase student engagement. However, there are obstacles in the implementation. Teachers mentioned that learning can become monotonous if all assessments use an authentic approach. In addition, although the values of the Pancasila learner profile such as cooperation and sportsmanship have been emphasized, the integration of these values into the assessment rubric has not been optimal due to time constraints and the absence of a comprehensive assessment guide. From the interviews, it appears that the development of authentic assessment instruments that cover cognitive aspects, skills, and student character is an urgent need. Teachers suggested that the development of this instrument emphasizes characters such as sportsmanship, initiative, and independent learning habits, which are relevant to the kinematics of straight motion material. In addition, the potential relationship between authentic assessment results and the achievement of the Pancasila learner profile dimension also needs to be investigated. Students with high scores in authentic assessment may exhibit attitudes and behaviors that are in line with the Pancasila learner profile, such as critical and creative reasoning. This can be analyzed using tools, such as the Winstep application, to determine the correlation between authentic assessment results and student character attitudes. Therefore, the development of authentic assessment based on Pancasila profile character education on straight motion kinematics material at SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi is expected to be a solution in improving the quality of assessment. This development focuses on assessments that not only measure students' cognitive understanding, but also measure students' essential character skills to support holistic and relevant learning in accordance with the principles of the Merdeka Curriculum.

3

1.2 Identification of problems Based on the background presented, several issues arise in the implementation of authentic assessment in physics learning at SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi:

  1. Teachers face challenges in effectively implementing authentic assessments that align with the objectives of the Independent Curriculum.
  2. The absence of clear guidelines for scoring and assessment instruments that integrate students' cognitive and character aspects.
  3. A gap exists between the expectations of the Independent Curriculum— where assessment supports character education—and current practices that predominantly focus on cognitive evaluation.

1.3 Scope of Research This research is limited to the following scope:

  1. The study focuses on developing authentic assessment instruments based on Pancasila Student Profile character education in the context of linear motion kinematics in physics learning.
  2. The research subjects are physics teachers and Grade XI students at SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi during the 2024/2025 academic year.
  3. The development includes scoring guidelines, assessment rubrics, and formats that emphasize authentic assessments aligned with Pancasila Student Profile character education.
  4. The research tests the effectiveness of the developed instruments in assessing character education-based authentic assessments.

1.4 Scope of the Problem The limitations of this research are as follows:

  1. The focus is on applying authentic assessment instruments based on Pancasila Student Profile character education in linear motion kinematics at SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi.
  2. The research subjects are limited to physics teachers and Grade XI students during the 2024/2025 academic year.

5

  1. Analyze the relationship between authentic assessment results and the dimensions of the Pancasila Student Profile using statistical tools like the Winstep application.
  2. Understand students' responses to the implementation of authentic assessment instruments based on Pancasila Student Profile character education.

1.7 Benefits of the Research The anticipated benefits of this research are as follows:

  1. For Teachers:  Provide clear guidelines for creating authentic assessment rubrics that integrate dimensions of the Pancasila Student Profile.  Support the measurable and systematic development of student character.
  2. For Students:  Enhance understanding of the relevance of physics concepts to real life.  Foster the internalization of Pancasila values such as faith, global diversity, mutual cooperation, independence, critical thinking, and creativity.
  3. For Other Researchers:  Serve as a reference for developing authentic assessment instruments that connect academic achievement with character development based on the Pancasila Student Profile.

6

CHAPTER II

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Authentic Assessment 2.1.1 Definition of Assessment Learning consists of three main stages: planning, implementation, and evaluation. Assessment, as part of the learning process, is located in the evaluation stage. It is conducted to measure the achievement of learning objectives (Pasaribu & Saparini, 2016). Linch (1996) stated that assessment is a systematic effort to collect information to make informed considerations and decisions. Brown (2004) defines assessment as a method of measuring a person's skills, knowledge, or performance within a deliberately determined context. Similarly, the Indonesian National Education Standards Board (Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan, 2006) describes assessment as the process of collecting and processing information to measure the achievement of student learning outcomes. 2.1.2 Understanding Authentic Assessment Authentic assessment is an evaluation method aimed at measuring students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes through tasks relevant to real life (Airasian, 2005). This method emphasizes critical thinking to solve real problems, requiring students to integrate their knowledge, skills, and attitudes to tackle new challenges (Darling- Hammond & Snyder, 2000). It not only hones analytical and reflective thinking but also fosters social skills like communication and collaboration (Nitko & Brookhart, 2011; Birenbaum & Dochy, 1996). The main purpose of authentic assessment is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of students’ abilities, encompassing cognitive understanding and life skills applicable in real-world scenarios. Authentic assessments allow students to see the relevance of their knowledge outside the classroom, helping them develop problem-solving, critical analysis, and decision-making skills that align with real- life situations. Moreover, authentic assessment motivates students to engage more deeply with their learning by connecting classroom material to practical applications (Gielen et al., 2003). By fostering meaningful learning, authentic assessments

8

 Imitating or simulating challenging contexts as experienced by adults in the workplace or in public or private life,  Assess students' ability to use a variety of knowledge and skills effectively in complex tasks,  Provide opportunities to practice, consult resources, receive feedback, and refine work. Authentic assessment is not merely a measure of understanding; it also serves as a means of developing real skills that students can apply in their daily lives. Unlike conventional test questions, which typically assess students' abilities indirectly, authentic assessment evaluates how well students can apply their knowledge and skills in practical contexts. While conventional tests play an important role in education, they cannot replace the value of authentic assessment. The table below illustrates the differences between conventional tests and authentic assessments. Table 2.1 Comparison of Authentic and Traditional Assessments (Source: Indiana University Bloomington, 2024). Traditional Assessment

Authentic Assessment Authenticity Indicator

Requires correct answer.

Requires high quality products or performance and a rationale for the solution taken.

Success is not only about the correct answer, but also about the student's ability to provide reasons for their answer. The test material must be unknown to the students in advance to be valid.

It is best for students to be aware of assignment information as early as possible.

Students need to know or be able to predict the tasks and assessment standards.

Regardless of the real context and challenges.

Connected to real-world contexts and challenges; students must practice the material directly.

The tasks and constraints are similar to the situations faced by experts in the field.

Contains questions that isolate specific skills or facts.

An integrated challenge that requires a variety of interrelated skills and knowledge.

The tasks are varied and complex, even if there is one correct answer.

9

Easy questions to assess.

Involves complex tasks that may not have a right answer and are difficult to assess.

The validity of the assessment is not sacrificed for the sake of ease of assessment. Students only have one opportunity to demonstrate learning outcomes.

Iterative in nature; includes repetitive tasks.

Students may use a particular skill or knowledge in several different ways or contexts.

Gives the final score. Provides useful diagnostic information about student skills and knowledge.

These assessments are designed to improve future performance and this important information is directed to the student.

Authentic assessment offers several advantages over conventional tests. It is generally more valid, particularly for learning outcomes that demand higher- order thinking skills. By involving tasks relevant to real-world scenarios, authentic assessment is also more engaging and motivating for students. Furthermore, it provides more detailed insights into what students have learned and what areas require improvement. However, developing authentic assessments requires more time and effort from teachers and can be more challenging to score. To address the difficulties in scoring, creating a detailed scoring rubric can be beneficial. This rubric should outline the aspects to be evaluated and the corresponding scoring criteria. 2.1.4 Objectives and Principles of Authentic Assessment The purpose of authentic assessment is to:

  1. Assess individual abilities through specific tasks.
  2. Determine learning needs.
  3. Help and encourage students.
  4. Support teachers in improving their instruction.
  5. Identify effective learning strategies.
  6. Ensure institutional accountability.
  7. Enhance the overall quality of education (Santoso, 2004). Meanwhile, the four principles of authentic assessment are:

11

requires reflection. Portfolios are often assessed across multiple dimensions (Slater, 1996).

  1. Written and Oral Assessment Written assessments may take the form of essays requiring open-ended or constrained answers, while oral assessments may involve interviews. Written tests can be administered using paper-based or computer-based formats (Mardapi, 2012).
  2. Self-Assessment Self-assessment involves students evaluating their own achievement of competencies in a subject (Chi & VanLehn, 1991). This method assesses cognitive, affective, and psychomotor aspects, helping students identify their strengths and weaknesses, boosting self-confidence, and fostering honesty (Wiggins, 1990). In evaluating student learning, many education experts agree that the most effective assessments not only measure learning outcomes but also provide opportunities to enhance skills, deepen material understanding, and encourage further learning. The essence of these assessments lies in their authenticity. 2.1.6 Types of Authentic Assessment and Their Implementation In its implementation, authentic assessment can utilize various types of evaluation methods, including: (1) standardized achievement tests, (2) teacher- created tests, (3) activity logs, (4) anecdotal records, (5) attitude scales, (6) action reports, (7) work concept reviews, (8) individual assignments, (9) group or class assignments, (10) discussions, (11) interviews, (12) observation notes, (13) behavioral mapping, (14) portfolios, (15) questionnaires, and (16) sociometric measurements (Santoso, 2004). According to Nurhadi (2004), the following can serve as the basis for assessing student achievement: (1) projects or activities and their reports, (2) results of written tests (daily, semester, or final examinations), (3) portfolios (collections of student work over a semester or a year), (4) homework assignments, (5) quizzes, (6) student-created work, (7) student presentations or performances, (8) demonstrations, (9) reports, (10) journals, (11) written work, (12) group discussions, and (13) interviews. As a method for evaluating student learning outcomes, authentic assessment is closely tied to measurement. Authentic measurement involves placing students

12

in real-world scenarios that challenge them to apply their knowledge and skills. This approach evaluates student achievement as an effort to determine their collective capabilities, measures skills that cannot be effectively assessed through traditional methods, and is designed to align with criterion-referenced rather than norm-referenced standards.

Figure 2.1 Purpose of Using Authentic Assessment according to its characteristics (Source: Ngadip, 2012) Authentic assessment focuses on students' performance, reflecting their knowledge, skills, and competencies in a way that allows them to express themselves most appropriately and comfortably. However, implementing this assessment model presents several challenges. First, the process requires considerable time to manage. Second, a well-structured curriculum is essential. Third, minimizing bias in the assessment is critical to ensure objective results. The objectives of authentic assessment, aligned with its characteristics, are as follows:

  1. Students are given the opportunity to develop comprehensive responses, enabling them to formulate their answers rather than merely selecting from predefined options.
  2. Students can practice higher-order thinking skills relevant to the topics discussed, fostering the development of advanced reasoning beyond basic skills.