

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An experiment to determine the mass of a swinging rubber stopper using the relationship between the force of gravity, the velocity of the stopper, and the radius of the swing. The experiment involves measuring the period of the swing and using the equation of the line from a graph to calculate the mass of the stopper. The reasoning behind the experiment, the data collected, and the analysis used to arrive at the final mass calculation. It also addresses potential sources of error and suggests ways to improve the experimental setup to reduce these errors. A detailed and well-structured approach to the experiment, making it a valuable resource for students interested in learning about the principles of mechanics and experimental physics.
Typology: Lab Reports
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Using the equation of the line from ( Fig 1) the slope is given to be 45.24. The measured radius of
the string was 0.68 m. 0. 68 รท 45. 24 = 0. 00150 ๐๐ = 15. 0 ๐. Thus, calculated mass of the washer is 15g.
2
Ft = Fg: Since the system is not accelerating, the forces must be balanced therefore Ft = Fg
Fc = ๐๐ฃ
2
รท ๐ = ๐น๐ When rearranging for velocity squared this becomes: ๐ฃ
2
๐น๐. It is important to note that the mass in Fg is the mass at the bottom of the string pulling
the system down, while the mass listed simply as m is the mass of the washer. This means
they are different.
Looking at the data from part one (Fig. 2 ) it is possible to calculate the velocity from
the times measured using the formula ๐ฃ = ( 2 ๐๐) รท ๐. After squaring the calculated velocity
values, it is possible to graph the relationship between Fg and V
2
linearly. Doing this gives us
a relation that is akin to the one shown in Fig 1. The formula for a linear equation is ๐ฆ = ๐๐ฅ +
๐. If this were to be rewritten as a formula with relevant variables it would become the
familiar ๐ฃ
2
= (๐ รท ๐) โ ๐น๐ + ๐ต. ( Note: B does not represent a real variable, it was just the
y intercept for this relationship.) Since m , or slope equals
it is possible to take a
numerical value for slope from the graph and rearrange the equation to solve for mass. This
becomes (๐ รท ๐ ๐๐๐๐) = ๐.
The real measured mass of the washer was 14 .7g which gives a percent error of 4.17%. A source for this
margin of error could have been the limitations of the equipment of those carrying out the experiment. While
human reaction time was partially eliminated by timing the number of seconds per ten periods and taking the
average time for period (as opposed to the time per one period), it still does not fully factor out reaction time.
Considering how small the margin of error is, it is very likely that a source of error as small as that is most the most
significant source of error for this experiment. This error is a random error as the person taking the times could
have misjudged the point for ten periods to be either before, or after the real point. This means the error in data
would not be skewed a certain direction away from the true value. A way to eliminate this source of error would
be to take a video of the experiment with a timer running in the shot. This would allow the person taking the times
to watch the videos in slow motion and determine the correct times more precisely.