Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Determining the Mass of a Swinging Rubber Stopper, Lab Reports of Physics

An experiment to determine the mass of a swinging rubber stopper using the relationship between the force of gravity, the velocity of the stopper, and the radius of the swing. The experiment involves measuring the period of the swing and using the equation of the line from a graph to calculate the mass of the stopper. The reasoning behind the experiment, the data collected, and the analysis used to arrive at the final mass calculation. It also addresses potential sources of error and suggests ways to improve the experimental setup to reduce these errors. A detailed and well-structured approach to the experiment, making it a valuable resource for students interested in learning about the principles of mechanics and experimental physics.

Typology: Lab Reports

2020/2021

Uploaded on 05/30/2022

snjsdnjdn
snjsdnjdn ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

1 document

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Guiding Question:
What is the Mass of the Swinging Rubber Stopper?
Evidence:
Reasoning:
Ft, Tension force
Using the equation of the line from (Fig 1) the slope is given to be 45.24. The measured radius of
the string was 0.68 m. 0.68 รท45.24 = 0.00150๐‘˜๐‘” =15.0๐‘”. Thus, calculated mass of the washer is 15g.
Weight (Fg)
0.42 N
0.78N
1.1 N
Time/Period
0.975s
0.707s
0.578s
Force of Gravity
V2
Ft =Fg: Since the system is not accelerating, the forces must be balanced therefore Ft = Fg
Fc = ๐‘š๐‘ฃ2รท ๐‘Ÿ = ๐น๐‘” When rearranging for velocity squared this becomes: ๐‘ฃ2=(๐‘Ÿ รท ๐‘š)โˆ—
๐น๐‘”. It is important to note that the mass in Fg is the mass at the bottom of the string pulling
the system down, while the mass listed simply as m is the mass of the washer. This means
they are different.
Looking at the data from part one (Fig. 2) it is possible to calculate the velocity from
the times measured using the formula ๐‘ฃ = (2๐œ‹๐‘Ÿ)รท ๐‘‡. After squaring the calculated velocity
values, it is possible to graph the relationship between Fg and V2 linearly. Doing this gives us
a relation that is akin to the one shown in Fig 1. The formula for a linear equation is ๐‘ฆ = ๐‘š๐‘ฅ +
๐‘. If this were to be rewritten as a formula with relevant variables it would become the
familiar ๐‘ฃ2=(๐‘Ÿ รท ๐‘š)โˆ— ๐น๐‘” + ๐ต . (Note: B does not represent a real variable, it was just the
y intercept for this relationship.) Since m, or slope equals (๐‘Ÿ รท ๐‘š) it is possible to take a
numerical value for slope from the graph and rearrange the equation to solve for mass. This
becomes (๐‘Ÿ รท ๐‘ ๐‘™๐‘œ๐‘๐‘’)= ๐‘š.
Figure 2
Figure 1
๐‘ฆ = 45.24๐‘ฅ + 2.196
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Determining the Mass of a Swinging Rubber Stopper and more Lab Reports Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Guiding Question:

What is the Mass of the Swinging Rubber Stopper?

Evidence:

Reasoning:

Ft, Tension force

Using the equation of the line from ( Fig 1) the slope is given to be 45.24. The measured radius of

the string was 0.68 m. 0. 68 รท 45. 24 = 0. 00150 ๐‘˜๐‘” = 15. 0 ๐‘”. Thus, calculated mass of the washer is 15g.

Weight (Fg) 0.42 N 0.78N 1.1 N

Time/Period 0.975s 0.707s 0.578s

Force of Gravity

V

2

Ft = Fg: Since the system is not accelerating, the forces must be balanced therefore Ft = Fg

Fc = ๐‘š๐‘ฃ

2

รท ๐‘Ÿ = ๐น๐‘” When rearranging for velocity squared this becomes: ๐‘ฃ

2

= (๐‘Ÿ รท ๐‘š) โˆ—

๐น๐‘”. It is important to note that the mass in Fg is the mass at the bottom of the string pulling

the system down, while the mass listed simply as m is the mass of the washer. This means

they are different.

Looking at the data from part one (Fig. 2 ) it is possible to calculate the velocity from

the times measured using the formula ๐‘ฃ = ( 2 ๐œ‹๐‘Ÿ) รท ๐‘‡. After squaring the calculated velocity

values, it is possible to graph the relationship between Fg and V

2

linearly. Doing this gives us

a relation that is akin to the one shown in Fig 1. The formula for a linear equation is ๐‘ฆ = ๐‘š๐‘ฅ +

๐‘. If this were to be rewritten as a formula with relevant variables it would become the

familiar ๐‘ฃ

2

= (๐‘Ÿ รท ๐‘š) โˆ— ๐น๐‘” + ๐ต. ( Note: B does not represent a real variable, it was just the

y intercept for this relationship.) Since m , or slope equals

๐‘Ÿ รท ๐‘š

it is possible to take a

numerical value for slope from the graph and rearrange the equation to solve for mass. This

becomes (๐‘Ÿ รท ๐‘ ๐‘™๐‘œ๐‘๐‘’) = ๐‘š.

Force of Gravity, or Fg

Figure 2

Figure 1

The real measured mass of the washer was 14 .7g which gives a percent error of 4.17%. A source for this

margin of error could have been the limitations of the equipment of those carrying out the experiment. While

human reaction time was partially eliminated by timing the number of seconds per ten periods and taking the

average time for period (as opposed to the time per one period), it still does not fully factor out reaction time.

Considering how small the margin of error is, it is very likely that a source of error as small as that is most the most

significant source of error for this experiment. This error is a random error as the person taking the times could

have misjudged the point for ten periods to be either before, or after the real point. This means the error in data

would not be skewed a certain direction away from the true value. A way to eliminate this source of error would

be to take a video of the experiment with a timer running in the shot. This would allow the person taking the times

to watch the videos in slow motion and determine the correct times more precisely.