Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Classical Music effects Visual Memory, Essays (university) of Experimental Psychology

a research of correlation between classical music and visual memory

Typology: Essays (university)

2018/2019

Uploaded on 05/14/2019

berkenimo
berkenimo 🇹🇷

4

(1)

2 documents

1 / 13

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Background Classical Music Has a Positive Effect on Visual Memory
Berke Bayender, Damla Arda, Melih Talha Aydın, Hesna Cansu Toker, Ece Okutan
ABSTRACT
The effects of listening to classical music on memory was controversial, especially regarding
visual memory. We predict that background classical music would have positive effects on individual’s
visual memory. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether there is any connection between listening
classical music and visual memory. 30 undergraduate students which are randomly selected at
Yeditepe University participated the study. The memory test was conducted with playing card
matching game in two situations: with classical background music and without any music. Subjects
completed the test in a silent room and their completion times were noted by the tester. After the first
part, they were taken to another room where there was classical music in the background. We also look
at the demographic information which was gathered before the test and revealed the connections
between listening to classical music, gender and playing any instruments to our test results. Our results
confirmed our hypothesis: Classical music has an important positive impact on visual memory. All
findings were compatible with our anticipations. Yet, our subject group was as small as 30 people.
Thus, further research needs to be done with bigger groups to test this hypothesis better.
Introduction
The effects of classical music on our body and mind cannot be ignored. Searching for benefits
of listening to classical music is avocatory, given that it was reported to have positive effects on the
human body, such as lowering blood pressure, improving sleep quality and reducing stress (Bekiroğlu,
2013). Moreover, many researches prove the positive effects of listening classical music on spatial-
task and academic performance. For instance, Shellenberg (2004) investigated the idea that music has
positive effects on intelligence. He tested the hypothesis that music lessons enhance IQ, on a sample
(N=144) of 6 yearS old children. Participants were randomly assigned to four conditions: music lesson
group with keyboard, music lesson group with Kodaly singing, drama lesson group and no lesson
group. Before and after the 36-week treatment period, he tested General IQ scores by WISC-III, the
most commonly used IQ test. The effect he obtained was small but it generalized across subtests of the
WISC-III test, index scores and most importantly to the standardized measure of academic
achievement. Surprisingly, children who received drama lessons showed improvements in adaptive
social behavior. This effect was not obtained for music lesson groups. This line of study regarding the
positive effects of classical music on learning and other cognitive skills was named as “The Mozart
Effect” and was investigated by number of studies. For instance, Wilson & Brown (2010) have
investigated effects of classical music on other cognitive tasks. They assigned 22 participants to three
listening conditions: a piano concerto by Mozart, repetitive relaxation music, and silence. The task
was solving mazes which varied in complexity of size and solution. However, they failed to obtain
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd

Partial preview of the text

Download Classical Music effects Visual Memory and more Essays (university) Experimental Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

Background Classical Music Has a Positive Effect on Visual Memory

Berke Bayender, Damla Arda, Melih Talha Aydın, Hesna Cansu Toker, Ece Okutan

ABSTRACT

The effects of listening to classical music on memory was controversial, especially regarding

visual memory. We predict that background classical music would have positive effects on individual’s

visual memory. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether there is any connection between listening

classical music and visual memory. 30 undergraduate students which are randomly selected at

Yeditepe University participated the study. The memory test was conducted with playing card

matching game in two situations: with classical background music and without any music. Subjects

completed the test in a silent room and their completion times were noted by the tester. After the first

part, they were taken to another room where there was classical music in the background. We also look

at the demographic information which was gathered before the test and revealed the connections

between listening to classical music, gender and playing any instruments to our test results. Our results

confirmed our hypothesis: Classical music has an important positive impact on visual memory. All

findings were compatible with our anticipations. Yet, our subject group was as small as 30 people.

Thus, further research needs to be done with bigger groups to test this hypothesis better.

Introduction

The effects of classical music on our body and mind cannot be ignored. Searching for benefits

of listening to classical music is avocatory, given that it was reported to have positive effects on the

human body, such as lowering blood pressure, improving sleep quality and reducing stress (Bekiroğlu,

2013). Moreover, many researches prove the positive effects of listening classical music on spatial-

task and academic performance. For instance, Shellenberg (2004) investigated the idea that music has

positive effects on intelligence. He tested the hypothesis that music lessons enhance IQ, on a sample

(N=144) of 6 yearS old children. Participants were randomly assigned to four conditions: music lesson

group with keyboard, music lesson group with Kodaly singing, drama lesson group and no lesson

group. Before and after the 36-week treatment period, he tested General IQ scores by WISC-III, the

most commonly used IQ test. The effect he obtained was small but it generalized across subtests of the

WISC-III test, index scores and most importantly to the standardized measure of academic

achievement. Surprisingly, children who received drama lessons showed improvements in adaptive

social behavior. This effect was not obtained for music lesson groups. This line of study regarding the

positive effects of classical music on learning and other cognitive skills was named as “The Mozart

Effect” and was investigated by number of studies. For instance, Wilson & Brown (2010) have

investigated effects of classical music on other cognitive tasks. They assigned 22 participants to three

listening conditions: a piano concerto by Mozart, repetitive relaxation music, and silence. The task

was solving mazes which varied in complexity of size and solution. However, they failed to obtain

support for previously revealed enhancement effects of listening to classical music and called for

future research on the topic. Cabanac et al. (2013) explored whether listening to pleasant music has

positive effects on academic achievements. They have concluded studying music, rather than studying

while listening to music has facilitating effects on learning in general, leading to enhanced academic

achievements.

Zhu et al (2008) have investigated the effects of Mozart's sonata K.448 on voluntary and

involuntary attention in an ERP study. In a visual oddball task, they analyzed the ERP measures of P3a

and P3b, which reflect involuntary and voluntary attention, respectively. The study supported the

Mozart effect on voluntary attention, given that P3b latency was influenced by Mozart's sonata K.448.

Using an ERP paradigm, Proverbio & De Benedetto (2018) have investigated the effects of

background music on learning and memory. ERP measures obtained in their study showed that

listening to music while studying facilitated encoding of faces. These results indicate that listening to

music enhances memory.

The positive effects of classical music on learning and other cognitive skills were investigated

also in longitudinal studies. For instance, Moreno et al (2008) have investigated functional differences

32 non-musician children. They have found that musical training rather than painting training

facilitated the reading skills of the children as well as pitch discrimination abilities in speech. Results

of their study suggest transfer effects from music to other domains, demonstrating brain plasticity.

Studies investigating the positive effects of classical music have focused on these effects on

cognitive tasks such as problem solving or memory, or on intelligence in general. Little attention has

been given to the facilitating effects of classical music on the visual domain, and specifically, on visual

memory. This gap in the field constitutes the motivation for the current study.

We predict that background classical music would have positive effects on individual’s visual

memory. To test this prediction and hypothesis we created a simple card game. We applied this game

to the participants with two settings, one of them is quiet and the other one has a classical music on

background.

METHOD

Subjects

35 undergraduate students at Yeditepe University participated in the experiment. They are randomly

selected from the university and asked to participate in a memory experiment done by students of the

psychology department. They differed in their majors, age and gender but they are all members of

Yeditepe University. In the demographic form, it was asked if the participants were playing any

musical instrument. It is a likelihood that there will be confounding effects if the participants have

familiarity with the music pieces in the experiment. We were cautious about this when we recruited the

participants and saved this data in order to use it afterward.

start matching the ones. There is no time limit but try to focus and finish as soon as possible.

Remember, you can only flip one card at a time. You can start now.

After the instructions explained, primarily subjects were given the practice demo game with a

smaller card group in order to be sure that they understand the game. Then the actual game started,

subjects completed the test in a silent room and their completion times were noted by the tester. After

the first part, they were taken to another room where there was classical music in the background.

They are expected to complete the memory test given the same instructions above. In both scenarios,

each subject is objected to the same songs in the same order and same cards in the same arrangement.

Songs were played on Spotify and they were around 40 and 70 decibels in this order: Divertimento in

B-Flat Major, K. 254: II. Adagio - Live Recording - Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Piano Concerto

No. 21 in C Major, K. 467 "Elvira Madigan": II. Andante - Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.

In the second part where there is classical background music, the arrangement of the cards is different

than the first one. The reason for the change is to prevent the learning effect from the previous

arrangement. The second arrangement is the opposite form of the first arrangement because we try to

minimize the possible effects of card order of each trial. In this way, each trial will have equal

difficulty levels.

In this experiment the independent variable is the classical music on the background, the dependent

variable is the duration of finishing the card task and there is no control group is used.

After they completed the memory test with classical background music, their completion times were

noted again and they were thanked, given the debriefing form. The same procedure is followed with

each subject. We predicted that background classical music would have effects on an individual’s

visual memory. To test this prediction, we compared the completion times of the first part and the

second part of the test.

RESULT

We predict that background classical music would have positive effects on individual’s visual

memory. After the data collected from 30 participants, paired sample t-test was applied. It was found

that there is a statistically significant difference between with and without classical music. The average

time for completing the task with music (339.93) and without music (377.80) were significantly

different (p =0.008) where participants performed significant faster while listening to music. So, it can

be concluded that classical music has a positive effect on visual memory.

When we look at the demographic information which was gathered before the test, we can see

that the people who are listening classical music genre, in general, are 24 seconds faster in completing

the task than people who are not interested in classical music. Non-classical music listeners have 28

seconds difference between the first condition and the second condition. But, classical music listeners

have 52 seconds difference between the conditions. As a result, there is no significant difference

between classical music listeners and non-listeners' experiments. (p= without classical music 0.

and with classical music 0.179)

When we look at gender, we saw that men finished the experiment with 99 seconds

faster without music, with music men were 90 seconds faster than women. Men finished with music in

304 seconds while women finished with music in 394 seconds and men finished in 338 seconds

without music and women finished in 437 seconds. As a result, there seems to be no significant

difference with music but on the other hand there is a difference between them without music.

(p= with music 0.017 and without music 0.072)

The last and probably the most anticipated point was whether playing an instrument positive

effects the time of completing the task or not. It is found that, without music, non-instrument players

have 25 seconds more slowly than instrument players and in the second task instrument players are 16

seconds faster than the non-instrument players. In both ways, instrument players have finished the task

faster than non-instrument players. As a result, there is no significant difference between instrument

players and non-instrument players. (p= with 0.147 and without 0.573)

were compatible with our anticipations. Yet, our subject group was as small as 30 people. Thus, further

research needs to be done with bigger groups to support our results.

References

Arnaud Cabanac, Perlovsky, L., Bonniot-Cabanac, M., & Cabanac, M. (2013). Music and academic

performance. Behavioural Brain Research , 256, 257-260. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.

Zhu, W., Zhao, L., Zhang, J., Ding, X., Liu, H., Ni, E., Zhou, C. (2008). The influence of mozart's

sonata K.448 on visual attention: An ERPs study. Neuroscience Letters , 434(1), 35-40. doi:10.1016/

j.neulet.2008.01.

Wilson, T. L., & Brown, T. L. (1997). Reexamination of the effect of mozart's music on spatial-task

performance. The Journal of Psychology , 131(4), 365-370. doi:10.1080/

Moreno, S., Marques, C., Santos, A., Santos, M., Castro, S. L., & Besson, M. (2009). Musical training

influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: More evidence for brain plasticity. Cerebral

Cortex , 19(3), 712-723. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn

Schellenberg, E. G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological Science, 15(8), 511-514. doi:

10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00711.x

Proverbio, A. M., & De Benedetto, F. (2018). Auditory enhancement of visual memory encoding is

driven by emotional content of the auditory material and mediated by superior frontal cortex.

Biological Psychology, 132, 164-175. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.12.

SPSS OUTPUT

T-Test

Paired Samples Statistics Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Pair 1 The duration of finishing the task without music

The duration of finishing the task with music

Paired Samples Correlations N Correlation Sig. Pair 1 The duration of finishing the task without music & The duration of finishing the task with music

Paired Samples Test Paired Differences Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Pair 1 The duration of finishing the task without music - The duration of finishing the task with music

Paired Samples Test Paired Differences

t df Sig. (2-tailed)

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Upper Pair 1 The duration of finishing the task without music - The duration of finishing the task with music

T-Test (For Gender)

Group Statistics Gender N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean The duration of finishing the task with music

Woman 12 393,83 104,705 30, Man 18 304,00 63,865 15, The duration of finishing the task without music

Woman 12 437,08 159,409 46, Man 18 338,28 96,599 22,

Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means F Sig. t

T-Test (For Instrument)

Group Statistics Do you play an instrument? N Mean Std. Deviation The duration of finishing the task with music

Yes 9 328,78 65, No 21 344,71 102, The duration of finishing the task without music

Yes 9 360,78 81, No 21 385,10 150,

Group Statistics Do you play an instrument? Std. Error Mean The duration of finishing the task with music

Yes 21, No 22, The duration of finishing the task without music

Yes 27, No 32,

Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means F Sig. t The duration of finishing the task with music

Equal variances assumed 2,223 ,147 -, Equal variances not assumed

The duration of finishing the task without music

Equal variances assumed 6,690 ,015 -, Equal variances not assumed

Independent Samples Test t-test for Equality of Means df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference The duration of finishing the task with music

Equal variances assumed 28 ,673 -15, Equal variances not assumed

The duration of finishing the task without music

Equal variances assumed 28 ,653 -24, Equal variances not assumed

Independent Samples Test t-test for Equality of Means Std. Error Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower The duration of finishing the task with music

Equal variances assumed 37,377 -92, Equal variances not assumed 31,343 -80, The duration of finishing the task without music

Equal variances assumed 53,491 -133, Equal variances not assumed 42,556 -111,

Independent Samples Test t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Upper The duration of finishing the task with music

Equal variances assumed 60, Equal variances not assumed 48, The duration of finishing the task without music

Equal variances assumed 85, Equal variances not assumed 63,

T-Test (For Classical Music)

Group Statistics Classical N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Lower

The duration of finishing the task with music

Equal variances assumed 34,615 -81, Equal variances not assumed 33,048 -78,

The duration of finishing the task without music

Equal variances assumed 49,586 -88, Equal variances not assumed 47,130 -83,

Independent Samples Test t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Upper

The duration of finishing the task with music

Equal variances assumed 59, Equal variances not assumed 56,

The duration of finishing the task without music

Equal variances assumed 114, Equal variances not assumed 109,