Download Classical Music effects Visual Memory and more Essays (university) Experimental Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!
Background Classical Music Has a Positive Effect on Visual Memory
Berke Bayender, Damla Arda, Melih Talha Aydın, Hesna Cansu Toker, Ece Okutan
ABSTRACT
The effects of listening to classical music on memory was controversial, especially regarding
visual memory. We predict that background classical music would have positive effects on individual’s
visual memory. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether there is any connection between listening
classical music and visual memory. 30 undergraduate students which are randomly selected at
Yeditepe University participated the study. The memory test was conducted with playing card
matching game in two situations: with classical background music and without any music. Subjects
completed the test in a silent room and their completion times were noted by the tester. After the first
part, they were taken to another room where there was classical music in the background. We also look
at the demographic information which was gathered before the test and revealed the connections
between listening to classical music, gender and playing any instruments to our test results. Our results
confirmed our hypothesis: Classical music has an important positive impact on visual memory. All
findings were compatible with our anticipations. Yet, our subject group was as small as 30 people.
Thus, further research needs to be done with bigger groups to test this hypothesis better.
Introduction
The effects of classical music on our body and mind cannot be ignored. Searching for benefits
of listening to classical music is avocatory, given that it was reported to have positive effects on the
human body, such as lowering blood pressure, improving sleep quality and reducing stress (Bekiroğlu,
2013). Moreover, many researches prove the positive effects of listening classical music on spatial-
task and academic performance. For instance, Shellenberg (2004) investigated the idea that music has
positive effects on intelligence. He tested the hypothesis that music lessons enhance IQ, on a sample
(N=144) of 6 yearS old children. Participants were randomly assigned to four conditions: music lesson
group with keyboard, music lesson group with Kodaly singing, drama lesson group and no lesson
group. Before and after the 36-week treatment period, he tested General IQ scores by WISC-III, the
most commonly used IQ test. The effect he obtained was small but it generalized across subtests of the
WISC-III test, index scores and most importantly to the standardized measure of academic
achievement. Surprisingly, children who received drama lessons showed improvements in adaptive
social behavior. This effect was not obtained for music lesson groups. This line of study regarding the
positive effects of classical music on learning and other cognitive skills was named as “The Mozart
Effect” and was investigated by number of studies. For instance, Wilson & Brown (2010) have
investigated effects of classical music on other cognitive tasks. They assigned 22 participants to three
listening conditions: a piano concerto by Mozart, repetitive relaxation music, and silence. The task
was solving mazes which varied in complexity of size and solution. However, they failed to obtain
support for previously revealed enhancement effects of listening to classical music and called for
future research on the topic. Cabanac et al. (2013) explored whether listening to pleasant music has
positive effects on academic achievements. They have concluded studying music, rather than studying
while listening to music has facilitating effects on learning in general, leading to enhanced academic
achievements.
Zhu et al (2008) have investigated the effects of Mozart's sonata K.448 on voluntary and
involuntary attention in an ERP study. In a visual oddball task, they analyzed the ERP measures of P3a
and P3b, which reflect involuntary and voluntary attention, respectively. The study supported the
Mozart effect on voluntary attention, given that P3b latency was influenced by Mozart's sonata K.448.
Using an ERP paradigm, Proverbio & De Benedetto (2018) have investigated the effects of
background music on learning and memory. ERP measures obtained in their study showed that
listening to music while studying facilitated encoding of faces. These results indicate that listening to
music enhances memory.
The positive effects of classical music on learning and other cognitive skills were investigated
also in longitudinal studies. For instance, Moreno et al (2008) have investigated functional differences
32 non-musician children. They have found that musical training rather than painting training
facilitated the reading skills of the children as well as pitch discrimination abilities in speech. Results
of their study suggest transfer effects from music to other domains, demonstrating brain plasticity.
Studies investigating the positive effects of classical music have focused on these effects on
cognitive tasks such as problem solving or memory, or on intelligence in general. Little attention has
been given to the facilitating effects of classical music on the visual domain, and specifically, on visual
memory. This gap in the field constitutes the motivation for the current study.
We predict that background classical music would have positive effects on individual’s visual
memory. To test this prediction and hypothesis we created a simple card game. We applied this game
to the participants with two settings, one of them is quiet and the other one has a classical music on
background.
METHOD
Subjects
35 undergraduate students at Yeditepe University participated in the experiment. They are randomly
selected from the university and asked to participate in a memory experiment done by students of the
psychology department. They differed in their majors, age and gender but they are all members of
Yeditepe University. In the demographic form, it was asked if the participants were playing any
musical instrument. It is a likelihood that there will be confounding effects if the participants have
familiarity with the music pieces in the experiment. We were cautious about this when we recruited the
participants and saved this data in order to use it afterward.
start matching the ones. There is no time limit but try to focus and finish as soon as possible.
Remember, you can only flip one card at a time. You can start now.
After the instructions explained, primarily subjects were given the practice demo game with a
smaller card group in order to be sure that they understand the game. Then the actual game started,
subjects completed the test in a silent room and their completion times were noted by the tester. After
the first part, they were taken to another room where there was classical music in the background.
They are expected to complete the memory test given the same instructions above. In both scenarios,
each subject is objected to the same songs in the same order and same cards in the same arrangement.
Songs were played on Spotify and they were around 40 and 70 decibels in this order: Divertimento in
B-Flat Major, K. 254: II. Adagio - Live Recording - Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Piano Concerto
No. 21 in C Major, K. 467 "Elvira Madigan": II. Andante - Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.
In the second part where there is classical background music, the arrangement of the cards is different
than the first one. The reason for the change is to prevent the learning effect from the previous
arrangement. The second arrangement is the opposite form of the first arrangement because we try to
minimize the possible effects of card order of each trial. In this way, each trial will have equal
difficulty levels.
In this experiment the independent variable is the classical music on the background, the dependent
variable is the duration of finishing the card task and there is no control group is used.
After they completed the memory test with classical background music, their completion times were
noted again and they were thanked, given the debriefing form. The same procedure is followed with
each subject. We predicted that background classical music would have effects on an individual’s
visual memory. To test this prediction, we compared the completion times of the first part and the
second part of the test.
RESULT
We predict that background classical music would have positive effects on individual’s visual
memory. After the data collected from 30 participants, paired sample t-test was applied. It was found
that there is a statistically significant difference between with and without classical music. The average
time for completing the task with music (339.93) and without music (377.80) were significantly
different (p =0.008) where participants performed significant faster while listening to music. So, it can
be concluded that classical music has a positive effect on visual memory.
When we look at the demographic information which was gathered before the test, we can see
that the people who are listening classical music genre, in general, are 24 seconds faster in completing
the task than people who are not interested in classical music. Non-classical music listeners have 28
seconds difference between the first condition and the second condition. But, classical music listeners
have 52 seconds difference between the conditions. As a result, there is no significant difference
between classical music listeners and non-listeners' experiments. (p= without classical music 0.
and with classical music 0.179)
When we look at gender, we saw that men finished the experiment with 99 seconds
faster without music, with music men were 90 seconds faster than women. Men finished with music in
304 seconds while women finished with music in 394 seconds and men finished in 338 seconds
without music and women finished in 437 seconds. As a result, there seems to be no significant
difference with music but on the other hand there is a difference between them without music.
(p= with music 0.017 and without music 0.072)
The last and probably the most anticipated point was whether playing an instrument positive
effects the time of completing the task or not. It is found that, without music, non-instrument players
have 25 seconds more slowly than instrument players and in the second task instrument players are 16
seconds faster than the non-instrument players. In both ways, instrument players have finished the task
faster than non-instrument players. As a result, there is no significant difference between instrument
players and non-instrument players. (p= with 0.147 and without 0.573)
were compatible with our anticipations. Yet, our subject group was as small as 30 people. Thus, further
research needs to be done with bigger groups to support our results.
References
Arnaud Cabanac, Perlovsky, L., Bonniot-Cabanac, M., & Cabanac, M. (2013). Music and academic
performance. Behavioural Brain Research , 256, 257-260. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.
Zhu, W., Zhao, L., Zhang, J., Ding, X., Liu, H., Ni, E., Zhou, C. (2008). The influence of mozart's
sonata K.448 on visual attention: An ERPs study. Neuroscience Letters , 434(1), 35-40. doi:10.1016/
j.neulet.2008.01.
Wilson, T. L., & Brown, T. L. (1997). Reexamination of the effect of mozart's music on spatial-task
performance. The Journal of Psychology , 131(4), 365-370. doi:10.1080/
Moreno, S., Marques, C., Santos, A., Santos, M., Castro, S. L., & Besson, M. (2009). Musical training
influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: More evidence for brain plasticity. Cerebral
Cortex , 19(3), 712-723. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn
Schellenberg, E. G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological Science, 15(8), 511-514. doi:
10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00711.x
Proverbio, A. M., & De Benedetto, F. (2018). Auditory enhancement of visual memory encoding is
driven by emotional content of the auditory material and mediated by superior frontal cortex.
Biological Psychology, 132, 164-175. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.12.
SPSS OUTPUT
T-Test
Paired Samples Statistics Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Pair 1 The duration of finishing the task without music
The duration of finishing the task with music
Paired Samples Correlations N Correlation Sig. Pair 1 The duration of finishing the task without music & The duration of finishing the task with music
Paired Samples Test Paired Differences Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Pair 1 The duration of finishing the task without music - The duration of finishing the task with music
Paired Samples Test Paired Differences
t df Sig. (2-tailed)
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Upper Pair 1 The duration of finishing the task without music - The duration of finishing the task with music
T-Test (For Gender)
Group Statistics Gender N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean The duration of finishing the task with music
Woman 12 393,83 104,705 30, Man 18 304,00 63,865 15, The duration of finishing the task without music
Woman 12 437,08 159,409 46, Man 18 338,28 96,599 22,
Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances
t-test for Equality of Means F Sig. t
T-Test (For Instrument)
Group Statistics Do you play an instrument? N Mean Std. Deviation The duration of finishing the task with music
Yes 9 328,78 65, No 21 344,71 102, The duration of finishing the task without music
Yes 9 360,78 81, No 21 385,10 150,
Group Statistics Do you play an instrument? Std. Error Mean The duration of finishing the task with music
Yes 21, No 22, The duration of finishing the task without music
Yes 27, No 32,
Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances
t-test for Equality of Means F Sig. t The duration of finishing the task with music
Equal variances assumed 2,223 ,147 -, Equal variances not assumed
The duration of finishing the task without music
Equal variances assumed 6,690 ,015 -, Equal variances not assumed
Independent Samples Test t-test for Equality of Means df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference The duration of finishing the task with music
Equal variances assumed 28 ,673 -15, Equal variances not assumed
The duration of finishing the task without music
Equal variances assumed 28 ,653 -24, Equal variances not assumed
Independent Samples Test t-test for Equality of Means Std. Error Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower The duration of finishing the task with music
Equal variances assumed 37,377 -92, Equal variances not assumed 31,343 -80, The duration of finishing the task without music
Equal variances assumed 53,491 -133, Equal variances not assumed 42,556 -111,
Independent Samples Test t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Upper The duration of finishing the task with music
Equal variances assumed 60, Equal variances not assumed 48, The duration of finishing the task without music
Equal variances assumed 85, Equal variances not assumed 63,
T-Test (For Classical Music)
Group Statistics Classical N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Lower
The duration of finishing the task with music
Equal variances assumed 34,615 -81, Equal variances not assumed 33,048 -78,
The duration of finishing the task without music
Equal variances assumed 49,586 -88, Equal variances not assumed 47,130 -83,
Independent Samples Test t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Upper
The duration of finishing the task with music
Equal variances assumed 59, Equal variances not assumed 56,
The duration of finishing the task without music
Equal variances assumed 114, Equal variances not assumed 109,