



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The benefits and drawbacks of protected areas for biodiversity conservation and local populations, as well as the need for more efficient farming practices. It also explores the concepts of density dependence and sustainable intensification in the context of conservation and agriculture. The document highlights the importance of proper management, funding, and connectivity for protected areas and sustainable agriculture.
Typology: Exams
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
BIOL 3130 Final Exam Questions: Answer: The benefits of a properly managed protected area include:
Answer: The increasing food demands are driving the need for more efficient use of current farmland, it is not sustainable to incorporate more land into farming practices, instead land should be managed differently to boost outputs and maintain environmental sustainability. Current agricultural practices will not be able to reach food production goals, instead more land must be incorporated into farming practices. Current production and transportation methods are also unsustainable, and changes on the producer side can also help increase efficiency and mitigate GEC These three papers all focus on how the efficiency of farmland can be increased, relating to both the actual output of that land, and the ability of that land to provide important services, such as; carbon sequestration, and nitrogen fixation. Efficiency of farmland can be improved if sustainable intensification methods are used These SI methods increase production without increasing environmental costs. Sustainable intensification uses 3 stages; the first of which focuses on the better use of resources to be more efficient. The second focusses on substituting older less efficient technologies with new ones. Lastly redesign; which focuses on the utilization of ecological processes to increase production sustainably. Carbon farming is another method of increasing the sustainability and efficiency of farmland, it focusses on the use of cover crops, trees, and pastures, to increase carbon storage in the soil through carbons sequestration. In turn making that soil more useful, while also mitigating climate change by taking co2 out of the air and depositing the carbon into the soil. Sustainable harvesting is another way that efficiency and sustainability could be increased, relying on threshold exploitation, to only take what is over the carrying capacity. One of the main points stressed in all three papers, is that producers are only capable of so much, as consumers we have the responsibility to source out sustainable alternatives, such as plant based diets. Which have been proven to emit a lot less GHG during production.
Problem surrounding increasing efficacy usually fall onto 2 outcomes, lack of knowledge and lack of resources. For example, threshold harvesting can only be done if the carrying capacity and population demographics of a species and environment are known. Also it is hard to educate farmers on the methods of increasing efficiency and its social benefits. The farmers field schooling (FFS) idea presented in Pretty 2018 is a good idea, it is very challenging to implement, and requires large amounts of resources and cooperation between farmers for global adoption.