Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Importance & Challenges of Managing Protected Areas & Sustainable Agriculture, Exams of Biology

The benefits and drawbacks of protected areas for biodiversity conservation and local populations, as well as the need for more efficient farming practices. It also explores the concepts of density dependence and sustainable intensification in the context of conservation and agriculture. The document highlights the importance of proper management, funding, and connectivity for protected areas and sustainable agriculture.

Typology: Exams

2020/2021

Uploaded on 06/08/2021

andyPandyAndrea84
andyPandyAndrea84 🇨🇦

5

(2)

3 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
BIOL 3130 Final Exam Questions:
Answer:
The benefits of a properly managed protected area include:
- significantly reduced rates of habitat loss and fragmentation the main threat to biodiverstiy
- they provide food security and water for local populations.
- They have also been shown to maintain species population levels much better then other
management strategies.
- they also contribute to local economies via ecotourism, allowing conservation to be balanced
with community needs.
- Some of the drawbacks of protected areas are that the majority are not managed properly,
and although the amount of protected areas are increasing, the efficacy of the land is
decreasing.
- Lack of funding and government support has led to a lot of protected areas being unenforced,
resulting in habitat loss, fragmentation and diversity loss almost identical to unprotected areas.
- Current park design also fails to capture the entire ranges of most species in which they are
attempting to protect making it difficult for that species to continue to persist in that area.
- the current parks have also failed to capture diversity hot spots, and ecoregions important for
ecosystem processes
- Another downside to current park design is that they are coming increasingly closer to
humans, and could possibly inhibit the growth and development of growing community.
Effectiveness:
The authors never clearly stated how the parks effectiveness would be assessed, although they
make it relatively clear that it relates to stable populations of species and declined rates of
habitat loss and degradation. As well as accomplishing any other goal which the park set out to
accomplish when established, for ex., restabilising a certain species population in the area.
Analysis:
- There is insufficient global funding to properly manage current parks, let alone the creation of
new parks
- current amount of protected area pledged by CBD is not enough to evoke any real
environmental changes, yet it is to high for us to successfully implement
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Importance & Challenges of Managing Protected Areas & Sustainable Agriculture and more Exams Biology in PDF only on Docsity!

BIOL 3130 Final Exam Questions: Answer: The benefits of a properly managed protected area include:

  • significantly reduced rates of habitat loss and fragmentation the main threat to biodiverstiy
  • they provide food security and water for local populations.
  • They have also been shown to maintain species population levels much better then other management strategies.
  • they also contribute to local economies via ecotourism, allowing conservation to be balanced with community needs.
  • Some of the drawbacks of protected areas are that the majority are not managed properly, and although the amount of protected areas are increasing, the efficacy of the land is decreasing.
  • Lack of funding and government support has led to a lot of protected areas being unenforced, resulting in habitat loss, fragmentation and diversity loss almost identical to unprotected areas.
  • Current park design also fails to capture the entire ranges of most species in which they are attempting to protect making it difficult for that species to continue to persist in that area.
  • the current parks have also failed to capture diversity hot spots, and ecoregions important for ecosystem processes
  • Another downside to current park design is that they are coming increasingly closer to humans, and could possibly inhibit the growth and development of growing community. Effectiveness: The authors never clearly stated how the parks effectiveness would be assessed, although they make it relatively clear that it relates to stable populations of species and declined rates of habitat loss and degradation. As well as accomplishing any other goal which the park set out to accomplish when established, for ex., restabilising a certain species population in the area. Analysis:
  • There is insufficient global funding to properly manage current parks, let alone the creation of new parks
  • current amount of protected area pledged by CBD is not enough to evoke any real environmental changes, yet it is to high for us to successfully implement
  • Countries around the globe have still pledge even more protect area to the CBD before 2020, this is an extremely unrealistic goal, as current parks are not being managed effectively so increasing the area is redundant and possibly detrimental
  • Instead of creating more parks, we should instead focus on maintaining current parks, and focusing on encompassing entire ecoregions, and species ranges when developing these parks. In order to better protect ecosystem services and species diversity.
  • encompassing more biodiversity hotspots would also be beneficial, as current parks protect a lot of rock and ice, as biodiverse areas are also greatly affected by humans and need the protection (e.x. all the rainforests in the world lol)
  • it is also important that the management of parks incorporates more connectivity, as this can give smaller parks some of the same characteristics as large parks, giving species the ability to migrate and move around in their changing environment (connectivity helps mitigate effects of GEC on species) Crisis Discipline: The lack of information when making these important decisions regarding conservation efforts is why CB is a ‘crisis discipline’, constantly playing catch-up with the changing environment. Only made harder by anthropogenic effects and individualistic species responses, making conservation during this period of climate change even more difficult. It’s difficult for scientists to come up with an overall plan for protected areas, as each area on earth and each species reacts differently to its changing surroundings, most of which are novel and mostly unknown interactions, further proving the point that CB is a ‘crisis discipline’. Answer: Density dependence related to the process which limits population growth. As populations cannot grow indefinitely due to limited resources. Negative density dependence (also referred to as the Janzen-Connell Hypothesis); occurs at higher population densities, when population growth slows as the population density increases.

Answer: The increasing food demands are driving the need for more efficient use of current farmland, it is not sustainable to incorporate more land into farming practices, instead land should be managed differently to boost outputs and maintain environmental sustainability. Current agricultural practices will not be able to reach food production goals, instead more land must be incorporated into farming practices. Current production and transportation methods are also unsustainable, and changes on the producer side can also help increase efficiency and mitigate GEC These three papers all focus on how the efficiency of farmland can be increased, relating to both the actual output of that land, and the ability of that land to provide important services, such as; carbon sequestration, and nitrogen fixation. Efficiency of farmland can be improved if sustainable intensification methods are used These SI methods increase production without increasing environmental costs. Sustainable intensification uses 3 stages; the first of which focuses on the better use of resources to be more efficient. The second focusses on substituting older less efficient technologies with new ones. Lastly redesign; which focuses on the utilization of ecological processes to increase production sustainably. Carbon farming is another method of increasing the sustainability and efficiency of farmland, it focusses on the use of cover crops, trees, and pastures, to increase carbon storage in the soil through carbons sequestration. In turn making that soil more useful, while also mitigating climate change by taking co2 out of the air and depositing the carbon into the soil. Sustainable harvesting is another way that efficiency and sustainability could be increased, relying on threshold exploitation, to only take what is over the carrying capacity. One of the main points stressed in all three papers, is that producers are only capable of so much, as consumers we have the responsibility to source out sustainable alternatives, such as plant based diets. Which have been proven to emit a lot less GHG during production.

Problem surrounding increasing efficacy usually fall onto 2 outcomes, lack of knowledge and lack of resources. For example, threshold harvesting can only be done if the carrying capacity and population demographics of a species and environment are known. Also it is hard to educate farmers on the methods of increasing efficiency and its social benefits. The farmers field schooling (FFS) idea presented in Pretty 2018 is a good idea, it is very challenging to implement, and requires large amounts of resources and cooperation between farmers for global adoption.

  • FFS efficiency relies heavily on farmer participation and communication, and to achieve the goals of maintaining food security and sustainability relies on everyone’s continued participation. This same issue relates to the 3rd^ step in sustainable intensification; redesign, which requires farmers to have a good understanding of ecosystem functions and processes, in order to utilize the ecological processes to increase production An example of this would be IPM, it is known to be effective at preventing pests, and increasing production of the land, although it can be costly, labour intensive, and requires a good understanding of the environment and its species, therefore has yet to be widely adopted over chemical application.
  • we have alternatives which are known to be more sustainable, its just hard to educate everyone on the alternatives. Also the alternatives are also usually more costly, and labour intensive, making them less desirable It would also be important to develop a true measure of a company’s ‘sustainability’ in order to avoid corporate greenwashing, a process in which companies fabricate the image of being sustainable to increase shareholders and investments. Companies need to be held accountable for their outputs, forcing them to find efficient and sustainable alternatives. To be granted the certification of being sustainable a company must have a measurable difference in pollution or waste outputs for the products, increasing the efficiency by reusing, recycling and therefore reducing waste Government policy should be enforced that makes companies more responsible for their waste, in order to urge them to look for more cost efficient methods to create products, while also reducing environmental impact. Solutions for Food Distribution/Production Involving Corporations:  Standardized, quantifiable evaluation of a company’s sustainability o Allows for transparency between consumer/investor and corporation  Incorporate data from recent advances in scientific data o Reproducible, transparent and peer-reviewed  Require companies to take part in scientific testing o Proves that they are sustainable and not greenwashing